Skip to content

10 June, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Unilever chair

      News round-up: this week in governance

      Unilever seeks new chair; corporate purpose statements; unreadable annual reports; and helping the FRC on...

    • ESG strategy UK boards struggle to embed ESG in strategy

      Most recognise the importance of sustainability, but face challenges in translating ESG aims into strategy...

    • climate change litigation Growing climate litigation is ‘absolutely necessary’

      UN expert Ian Fry says court cases are needed to legally hold ‘to account’ those...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • audit committee

      Audit committees give investors a new perspective

      Investors who quiz the audit committee get a more rounded – albeit sometimes less comfortable...

    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Leadership ESG

      Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

      We asked 100 chairs, chief executives, other C-suite executives and company secretaries of UK companies,...

    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • Edison Energy Disclosure to Decarbonization report

      Disclosure to Decarbonization: A Guide to Setting and Achieving Your Climate Goals

      Sustainability leaders are charged with marshalling and coordinating resources, expertise, and innovation for a prosperous,...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

by Curtis Milhaupt on April 24, 2023

Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great power over policy and politics.

controlling shareholders

Image: ESBProfessional/Shutterstock.com

Elon Musk has been called a “geopolitical chaos agent” for inserting himself into volatile conflicts around the world. The Chinese government launched a “de-tycoonification” campaign to curb the influence of billionaire founders of private firms—such as Jack Ma, co-founder of multinational technology conglomerate the Alibaba Group—in its domestic internet industry.

Lee Jae-yong, heir to the controlling patriarch of Samsung, a business group virtually synonymous with South Korea’s impressive economic development, was jailed for bribing his country’s president in an incident leading to her impeachment.

To date, corporate governance scholars have focused exclusively on the economic impact of corporate control—the creation and diversion of wealth by controlling shareholders. Scholars have not examined the distinctive role of controlling shareholders in the exercise of corporate power and the range of policy domains in which controlled firms are key protagonists.

Particularly at a moment when the impact of corporations on society is receiving considerable attention, it is necessary for corporate governance scholarship (and boards of directors around the world) to grapple with the global ramifications of the power of corporate control.

The controlling entity

Why is it necessary for corporate governance scholars to analyse the reach of controlling shareholders and controlled firms into these much broader (geo)political questions? Because the power of corporate control is a product of basic corporate law and governance principles, with implications extending well beyond the firm itself.

For example, consider the most straightforward case in which a government is the controlling shareholder of a state-owned enterprise (SOE). SOE objectives (China is a good example) might include pursuing industrial policy goals, increasing employment, or securing state control over the “commanding heights” of the economy.

Or consider private controlling shareholders and their interactions with the home country government, for example, decades of relations between the Lee family of Samsung and the presidents of South Korea.

To date, corporate governance scholars have focused exclusively on the economic impact of corporate control.

Concentrated corporate control, typically using controlling minority share structures (pyramidal and circular ownership patterns) provides coordination benefits for a growth-minded government that facilitate economic development. It is probably not coincidental that a number of developmental “miracles” have featured close, lasting interactions between private business groups under the control of their founders and their growth-minded home governments.

Next, consider an individual (human) controlling shareholder (for example, Jack Ma or Mark Zuckerberg). Private technology firms under the control of individual founders using dual class and analogous governance structures have claimed ownership over vast quantities of data: assets of enormous, dual commercial-public significance. The influence of these firms and their controlling shareholders on domestic politics and public discourse has generated a major backlash.

States of control

In the global economy today, a range of different political-economic systems coexist, each of which could loosely be characterised as “corporate capitalist”. In each, the corporation is a central actor in a distinctive mixture of market forces and state regulation, influence and/or control.

In developmental state capitalism, the chaebol business groups—conglomerates typically controlled by single families or individuals—have a distinctive history closely linked to the development of the Korean economy. The relationship between the chaebol and the Korean government that emerged out of this partnership for economic growth is best described as “symbiotic”. Korea’s economic success has served to validate the government’s reliance on the chaebol as engines of growth, exports, and employment.

Surveillance capitalism may loosely be defined as the use of data on human behaviour…for a new form of market exchange.

In Chinese party-state capitalism, the governance characteristics of SOEs generate an unusually potent fusion of economic and political power. This fusion makes the SOE a convenient instrument of policy channeling for the party-state. Control over the SOEs has remained with the party-state, not principally as a result of its equity ownership or through the functioning of corporate governance organs such as shareholders’ meetings and boards of directors, but through political mechanisms.

In Russia, an oligarchic-klepto state capitalism has emerged. Controlled firms in Russia generate cash flow to support Putin’s autocracy and finance his invasion of Ukraine. As one commentator notes, the “problem is not only state capitalism but how the Kremlin pursues it. It ignores competition, investment, technological development, and entrepreneurship. The state enterprises have many other purposes—political control, social mitigation, and personal enrichment of the Putin elite…”

Lastly, we now have high-tech surveillance capitalism. Surveillance capitalism may loosely be defined as the use of data on human behaviour as raw material for a new form of market exchange. In surveillance capitalism, the “behavioural surplus” generated by user interactions with an internet platform or app is claimed as the property of private firms for the generation of profits; and thus, the power over this data, along with its potential manipulation for behaviour modification, is held in the first instance not by the state, but by “surveillance capitalists” such as Facebook/Meta and Alibaba, under the control of their founders.

The world view

The most acute geopolitical implications of controlling shareholders and corporate control lie in the realm of national security, together with the closely related fields of data protection and technological innovation. The rise of China under its system of party-state capitalism poses major challenges to the United States and other western countries. Increased scholarly attention to the political-economic effects of corporate control can sharpen thinking about the regulation of controlled firms in the global economy.

International sanctions are also affected by controlling shareholders. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 highlighted the importance of economic sanctions in the arsenal of responses to state aggression and violations of international law.

Yet controlling shareholders complicate the efficacy of economic sanctions. For example, sanctions on Rusal, one of the world’s largest aluminium producers, imposed in response to suspected Russian interference in the 2016 election, created turmoil in the global aluminium market. The sanctions against Rusal were eased by the Trump administration after heavy criticism by US customers. Economic sanctions also frequently result in the tightening of state control over the target economy.

Controlling shareholders complicate the efficacy of economic sanctions.

Controlling shareholders also often wield significant influence in domestic politics. Elevated socio-political status in the home country is an important non-pecuniary benefit of corporate control. This influence carries significant risks for domestic political systems and institutional development. Take the Korea example again, where chaebol interests have greatly affected its legal system and media.

In the US, there is a debate in the corporate governance literature about the economic perils of dual-class capitalisation structures. But this debate is completely disconnected from rising concerns over outsized political influence of the tech industry and its key protagonists, such as Mark Zuckerberg, among some antitrust thinkers and politicians. Yet dual-class structures are the mechanism by which control in the tech industry is achieved.

Where next for stewardship?

Related to the issue of domestic political influence is the role of stewardship codes and ESG movements in markets where controllers dominate. Stewardship codes are intended to invigorate institutional investor engagement with portfolio firms to advance long-term corporate sustainability goals and inclusive practices.

The original stewardship code adopted in the UK, which propelled the global proliferation of such codes, fits a corporate governance environment of dispersed ownership and strong institutional investors.

These codes are an awkward fit in most of the rest of the world, where controlling shareholders are prevalent. Their adoption in controlling shareholder regimes may risk diverting attention from more difficult legal reforms that would actually serve to enhance the protections of minority shareholders vis-à-vis controllers.

The interaction between ESG, (geo)politics and corporate governance raises a number of significant questions directly relevant to boards of directors.

For example, in addition to managing an already daunting list of stakeholder interests, are boards of globally active firms prepared to grapple effectively with geopolitical risk and ESG? Whom do the independent directors of geopolitically important controlled firms represent and what interests should they safeguard? Might boards be subject to liability for failing to appreciate and mitigate the geopolitical risks facing their companies, for example, the possibility of supply chain failures caused by economic sanctions or bilateral economic friction?

Even more broadly, the ESG movement represents a call for the expansion of corporate influence over many domains of public governance in response to real and perceived failures of governments to address pressing environmental and social problems.

As this short article indicates, the lens through which controlling shareholders are viewed by corporate governance scholars needs to be greatly widened. Doing so prompts new thinking about the power of corporate control and its implications well beyond the boundaries of the firm itself—shifting the focus to the corporate protagonists who feature prominently in contemporary geopolitical tensions and corporate influence in domestic political systems.

Today, these broader concerns belong within the purview of corporate governance scholars, policymakers and practitioners. Globally, the political-economic effects of corporate control are, at the very least, as consequential as the economic implications of a controlling shareholder’s propensity to expropriate (“tunnel”) minority shareholder wealth, a preoccupation of corporate governance studies for the past two decades.

Curtis J Milhaupt is the William F Baxter-Visa International Professor of Law at Stanford Law School. A longer version of this article, ‘The (Geo)Politics of Controlling Shareholders’, can be found here

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code
    July 1, 2022
    Man with magnifying glass

    Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the boundaries of good regulation.

  • US corporate governance improvements 'slowed or stagnated' in 2021
    January 13, 2022
    Employees talking outside offices

    Report suggests crisis "fatigue" is eating away at gains made during 2020, with employee issues and ESG highlighted as concerns.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    July 15, 2022
    Elon Musk Twitter

    Dutch stakeholder committees; Elon Musk's next move on Twitter; C-suite partisanship in the US; ESG 'no distraction' from climate change.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    August 5, 2022
    carillion fine

    Audit firms' complaints about fines; Carillion directors' fines revealed; is it time to abolish the UK governance code?

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Alibaba Group, chaebol, China, Comment, controlling shareholders, corporate governance, Curtis J Milhaupt, data, data protection, Elon Musk, ESG, Facebook, geopolitical risk, geopolitics, Jack Ma, leadership, Lee Jae-yong, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta, minority share structures, Putin, risk management, Rusal, Russia, Samsung, shareholders, stakeholders, Stanford Law School, state-owned enterprise, stewardship, stewardship code, supply chain, surveillance capitalism, sustainability, Technology, Twitter, Ukraine

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • UK boards struggle to embed ESG in strategy
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • How to be an effective chair during volatile times
  • Audit committees give investors a new perspective
  • Top stories of 2022: corporate governance gets political

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|