Skip to content

1 October, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • auckland calling

      News round-up: this week in governance

      Auckland calling auditors; why ESG ratings matter; Victoria carpets’ ‘qualified’ audit; ethics and oligarchs; US...

    • pwc australia Review reveals leadership failure at PwC Australia

      Investigation into confidentiality leak finds ‘excessive’ power at the top and says poor decisions added...

    • board control Are boards losing control?

      We need to ensure that regulations do not inappropriately reduce a board’s ability to take...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • sustainability into finance

      How to integrate sustainability into financial decision-making

      Proactive leadership and board commitment are essential to transform notions of sustainability into fiscally viable...

    • reporting requirements

      Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • policy on human rights

      Why you need a policy on human rights

      As well as being the right thing to do, this element of a sustainable business...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • board control

      Are boards losing control?

      We need to ensure that regulations do not inappropriately reduce a board’s ability to take...

    • reporting requirements Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • helle bank jorgensen Helle Bank Jørgensen on governance, ESG and how board directors can become stewards of the future

      In spite of ESG toxicity in the US, she remains optimistic that companies are working...

    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

    • Starbucks sign outside shop in Warsaw, Poland DEI policies are targets for litigation, warns US lawyer

      Right-wing activists will continue to sue corporates over diversity, equity and inclusion policies they perceive...

    • CEO churn CEO churn is highest since 2019

      Chief executive appointments in the FTSE 100 are also up—but only 27% of incoming CEOs...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • ciia risk in focus

      Risk in Focus 2024: Hot topics for internal auditors

      Risk in Focus 2024 surveyed chief audit executives on their key challenges: geopolitical uncertainty and cybersecurity...

    • G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 cover

      G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023

      The G20/OECD principles help policy makers improve the regulatory and institutional framework for corporate governance.

    • stakeholder engagement

      Director Reference Guide: Stakeholder engagement

      Board Agenda's 'Director Reference Guide' for boards on building an honest and trust-based relationship with...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

UK boards face internal controls shake-up

by Gavin Hinks on December 13, 2022

The government’s reform proposals include seeking disclosures from many non-financial public interest entities.

internal controls

Image: PajorPawel/Shutterstock.com

Proposals to changes in the way companies manage internal controls will be a “major step change” for non-financial companies, as they adapt to government measures aimed at tackling financial risk.

The warning came during a event organised to explore the government’s reform plans, convened by Diligent and Board Agenda before an audience of finance and controls experts at The Ivy in London.

The changes come as part of a response to the collapse of construction giant Carillion in 2018. The government’s proposals are to include specific measures in the UK’s corporate governance code asking company directors to make disclosures on their internal controls and provide assurance that the controls are “appropriate”.

Speaking as a member of the panel, Carolyn Clarke, an audit committee chair and chief executive of Brave Consultancy, said: “It will be a big step change for the public interest entities that are now being captured by elements of this package.”

There were warnings too for companies who might think they could be able to argue that they are not captured by the new provisions.

Doris Honold, chair of the risk committee at Credit Suisse, said: “If in doubt, you’re in.” She added: “I just don’t see any upside in arguing a borderline case, especially when investors ask, ‘Are you complying with the new regime?’”

She stressed the importance of internal controls, and in particular the new requirements, in any exchange with investors. “There’s so many external stakeholders who will be interested,” said Honold. “And it’s a reasonable question: ‘Why can we trust your accounts?’ Well, because we know our controls are working.”

When the government first discussed transforming the internal controls regime, there was hope that it would opt for US-style rules—known as Sarbox or SOX, following the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley act. These would legislate for directors to sign off on an internal controls statement that would be subject to mandatory external audit.

Internal or external assurance?

However, as things stand, the government’s direction of travel is that, instead, new clauses will be added to the corporate governance code on a “comply or explain” basis, with boards able to choose the form of assurance they commission: internal or external.

The UK’s governance watchdog, the Financial Reporting Council, is consulting on the form of new measures and is expected to report some time next year.

However, the panellists did not believe that the “comply or explain” nature of the new regime would mean that companies would avoid external assurance.

Nehal Jilka, a partner and internal controls expert at business advisory firm KPMG, said: “Some organisations, based on what their boards believe, will seek external assurance.”

Jilka said there were different reasons for this: they see controls as part of their financial statement so will seek audits for both; others simply want the assurance.

Carolyn Clarke stressed that investors might lever pressure for external assurance, too. “You may well find an engaged investor who is fulfilling their responsibilities under the Stewardship Code will intervene and start to say, ‘We want to see more independent assurance around some of what you’re saying.’”

Preparing for the new internal controls regime may take a significant amount of work. Although some of that will be technical, or even resource driven, some, according to Clarke, will need to focus on organisational culture and “enabling an organisation to feel confident about doing the right thing”.

Clarke conceded that this might be easy when dealing with issues such as climate change or other ESG factors, but these factors were also present in internal controls and how they safeguard finances; after all, pension funds also invest in companies.

“When financial controls break down, pensioners suffer, not just investors but real people who have perhaps worked for an organisation for a very long time.

“So having good controls protects not just the organisation but all stakeholders we’re concerned about.”

Nehal Jilka agreed culture was “integral” to a strengthened internal controls regime. But he warned that “finance generally gets it. The issue is outside of finance.”

“Do people outside finance understand the importance of the value of controls and why you need to go above and beyond compliance?”

He also stressed preparation: mapping existing controls; scoping the work that would be needed for compliance; and documenting necessary key controls.

Comply and obtain…

Jilka stressed that reforming and installing internal controls was not just a “compliance” exercise.

“If there’s no value in the controls, there’s no point in doing the control,” he said. “There is a lot of value in looking at these material processes and actually getting more insight that then informs management decisions.”

Clarke warned that organisations may have to consider whether they have the “skills and capabilities” to go through the reform process. Many companies, especially the largest, she said, had already recruited experts to lead finance departments through change.

“It may not be the right thing to have somebody permanently in those kinds of roles, depending on your size and scale, but think about where this capability is going to come from. If you get ahead of the curve…you can access people who may not be available in six or 12 months.”

The full details of the internal controls regime remain to be clarified. But the broad sweep of new rules has been set. An early start will stand finance departments and companies in good stead.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Governance code reforms will ramp up internal controls
    July 12, 2022
    Patisserie Valerie

    Watchdog ‘lays groundwork for the creation of ARGA’ with planned consultation on audit committee ‘minimum standards’.

  • Auditors press for internal controls law
    September 27, 2022
    audit reform

    More than four years after the collapse of Carillion which sparked a call for ‘urgent’ audit reform, the wait continues.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    November 25, 2022
    shared audit cost

    Shared audit's £1bn cost; failed UK energy firms had no internal audit; governance rules for all; is climate risk reporting an SEC matter?

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    August 12, 2022
    pwc

    PwC fined for BT audit; greenwashing sanctions; cost of living crisis; $300m pay deal; US private equity and CEOs.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

audit, audit reform, Carillion, Carolyn Clarke, comply or explain, corporate governance, Diligent, Doris Honold, external audit, finance, Financial Reporting Council, internal audit, internal controls, investor relations, Nehal Jilka, news, public interest entities, risk, risk management, Sarbox, SOX, stakeholders, stewardship code, UK Corporate Governance Code

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Labour commits to audit reform legislation
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Are boards losing control?
  • Boards on their ESG journey still have some way to go
  • BDO now biggest auditor in the UK by number of listed clients

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|