Skip to content

22 March, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ethical decision-making

      Call for FTSE 100 companies to give guidance on ethics

      Most top firms have a published code of ethics, but many lack the framework to...

    • BlackRock Larry Fink Larry Fink puts focus on finance and inflation

      Although BlackRock’s CEO does not mention the term ‘ESG’ in his annual letter, he highlights...

    • woke silicon valley bank News round-up: this week in governance

      GOP declares SVB ‘woke’; banks slow to sustainability; fund managers accused of dodging voting risks;...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • data decision

      How to boost decision making

      Innovative digital tools can help boards to deliver against strategic objectives, but it is the...

    • remote working

      Navigating the new world of work

      Firms need to focus on building an inclusive environment and a culture of trust to...

    • digital transformation

      Digital transformation: Get the basics right

      Board involvement at the get-go will boost the chances of a successful digital transformation for...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uncertainty in 2023

      Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty

      Agility, planning in the shorter term and bravery will all stand chief executives in good...

    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • female ceo Less than a third of FTSE 100 executives are women

      In Europe as a whole, only 7.7% of top companies’ chief executives are female, gender...

    • board size Performance declines as boards grow in size

      Researchers found that investment dropped by 2-3 percentage points as companies passed from 12 to...

    • Silicon Valley governance Silicon Valley improves its governance

      Big technology companies are stealing a march over other top corporates when it comes to...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Gender diversity barometer

      Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe

      The 2023 Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe looks at the 16...

    • geopolitical risk airmic

      Navigating geopolitical risk

      Today, the future feels less secure, and optimism is more restrained. Taking decisions in an...

    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

by Sam De Silva and Barbara Zapisetskaya

An ISO standard issued this year gives guidance to boards on the governance implications of adopting the use of AI in organisations.

AI

Image: maxuser/Shutterstock.com

In April 2022, the International Standards Organisation issued a new standard, ISO 38507, to provide guidance for the governing body of an organisation that is using, or is considering the use of, artificial intelligence (AI) and to encourage organisations to use appropriate standards to underpin their governance of the use of AI.

From IT governance to AI governance

ISO/IEC 38500 is an international standard for IT governance, published in 2008. It indicates that management should follow six principles (responsibility, strategy, acquisition, performance, conformance, and human behaviour).

Since its publication in 2008, ISO/IEC 38500 has been used as a framework for IT use, pre-implementation assessment, and post-implementation, and has sequentially evolved through the 2015 revision and the development and publication of 38500 series.

Because AI is technically based on IT, it was decided to view it as an extension of IT governance and build AI governance in a form that takes into account the characteristics of AI. Accordingly, the need for ISO 38507 was established.

Where does the board fit in?

ISO 38507 emphasises that the governing body is central to the organisation, setting its purpose and approving the strategies necessary to achieve that purpose. The governing body has a degree of influence over the use and impact of AI on an organisation and must continually assess whether the existing governance is fit-for-purpose as the use of AI changes within an organisation.

The governing body’s accountability is emphasised as being maintained across the full lifecycle of the AI technology from purchase, implementation, deployment, testing and various project phases all the way to de-commissioning.

The diagram below from ISO 38507 demonstrates how the AI system life cycle changes from inception to decommission.

The complex nature of AI ecosystems means that the degree of oversight required by governing bodies depends on a variety of factors, including the following:

• the intended use of the AI system;
• the type of AI used;
• the potential benefit the AI system will deliver;
• the new risks that can accompany the AI system;
• the stage of implementation of the AI system, amongst others.

ISO 38507 recommends that organisations take the following actions, amongst others, to place necessary constraints on the use of AI:

Increase oversight of compliance

Governance oversight within organisations should be based on policies set by the organisation and should identify effective individual and collective accountability in an appropriate chain of responsibility, which is set alongside the context of use of AI.

This includes putting policies in place to make sure AI is used appropriately, there is sufficient human oversight in place and any persons using AI are properly trained and know how to raise concerns. Legal requirements or obligations may be determined for using such technologies alongside the risk appetite of the organisation.

Address the scope of use of AI

Formulating a description of the AI system, by way of its algorithms, data and models, would assist in being transparent enough to ensure the AI technology is being deployed for its intended use.

Assess and address the impact on stakeholders

ISO 38507 notes that the governing body is responsible outside of the context of AI of shaping and defining the organisation’s desired culture, which has an impact on stakeholders connected to the organisation.

Like all ISO standards, the publication of ISO 38507 is just the starting point

ISO 38507 notes the human impact on an organisation’s culture and values. These are implicitly embedded in the behaviour of staff and advocate for human involvement to a degree in the AI process, ensuring that AI systems can be monitored and corrected when needed.

A “cultures and values board” or an “ethics review board” might be set up to supervise the impact of AI systems and make sure it is aligned to an organisation’s values and culture.

The future for AI

An organisation’s governing body shapes its purpose, mission, vision, ethos, values and culture, and has a central role in steering the strategy, resource and oversight of such activities. Governance of AI itself is key for the adoption of AI.

The stats differ widely depending on how ‘AI adoption’ in the EU is measured (7% Eurostat, 2021 or 42% European Commission, 2020), but the fact remains that a key barrier to increased uptake in use and trust in AI is how exactly AI should be governed.

ISO 38507 notes the human impact on an organisation’s culture and values

Whilst there is no universal standard on what exactly AI governance should look like, this poses a significant opportunity for legislators globally to map out what they want AI regulation to look like.

ISO have embraced the development of a separate ISO standard on AI risk management, which fits alongside the UK’s National AI Strategy which places strong emphasis on the development of global technical standards.

Earlier this year, the UK government announced the creation of a new AI Standards Hub to help organisations better utilise and benefit from AI. We hope that ISO 38507 will be promoted by the AI Standards Hub, as an additional tool that can be offered to the UK AI community.

Like all ISO standards, the publication of ISO 38507 is just the starting point, and it will continue to change as the standard is used globally. However, we expect that general governance will be the framework that management will refer to, and as a result, some form of governance assessment will be required.

Currently, ISO is developing a standard for the evaluation of IT governance, and it is expected that AI governance will require a similar standard development in the near future.

Sam De Silva is a partner and Barbara Zapisetskaya a senior associate at international law firm, CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code
    July 1, 2022
    Man with magnifying glass

    Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the boundaries of good regulation.

  • US corporate governance improvements 'slowed or stagnated' in 2021
    January 13, 2022
    Employees talking outside offices

    Report suggests crisis "fatigue" is eating away at gains made during 2020, with employee issues and ESG highlighted as concerns.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    July 15, 2022
    Elon Musk Twitter

    Dutch stakeholder committees; Elon Musk's next move on Twitter; C-suite partisanship in the US; ESG 'no distraction' from climate change.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    August 5, 2022
    carillion fine

    Audit firms' complaints about fines; Carillion directors' fines revealed; is it time to abolish the UK governance code?

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

AI, AI Standards Hub, artificial intelligence, Barbara Zapisetskaya, corporate culture, corporate governance, governance, ISO 35087, Sam De Silva, Technology

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ESG resilience requires leaders to manage without certainty
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty
  • Sally Johnson joins Rentokil Initial as NED
  • How to boost decision making

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|