Skip to content

9 August, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ben & jerry's governance

      Ben & Jerry’s governance tested in court

      Unilever, owner of the ice cream brand, is in conflict with the governance legacy put...

    • carillion fine News round-up: this week in governance

      Audit firms' complaints about fines; Carillion directors' fines revealed; is it time to abolish the...

    • cyber security Cyber security reporting falls short

      UK companies are struggling to provide focused disclosures as cyber attacks continue to increase, says...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • ESG debate

      The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

      The issues boards face are rarely straightforward, and ESG is no exception. It is time...

    • AI

      How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

      An ISO standard issued this year gives guidance to boards on the governance implications of...

    • hybrid working

      Has hybridity killed teamwork?

      The time has come to check whether the benefits of teamwork are still outweighing the...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • global warming

      ESG is not a ‘distraction’

      We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society...

    • Man with magnifying glass The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

      Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the...

    • notebook on boardroom table The UK needs a code of conduct for company directors

      A formal code of conduct for company directors would signal their willingness to apply high...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Tory leadership contest; Grant Thornton fined; Norwegian insider dealing; virtual AGMs; US environmental disclosures; diversity...

    • A group of diverse job candidates Diversity business case arguments may deter job candidates

      Performance-based and fairness-based arguments confirm that social identities "are a lens through which contributions will...

    • Directors waiting for an interview Gender diversity warning for FTSE All-Share Index

      Report from Women on Boards and Protiviti reveals half of FTSE All Share companies outside...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

Focus on the ‘G’ of ESG

by Paul Barnett

Listening to what stakeholders define as valuable is the key to successful governance—and it will make corporate reporting much easier, too.

governance

Image: Fizkes/Shutterstock.com

ESG (environmental, social, and governance) is getting much criticism these days, as did CSR (corporate social responsibility), which it replaced. More generally, corporate reporting is becoming something of a “dog’s dinner”. And the problem is getting worse.

These issues distract attention from the real issue: “the global governance crisis”, as I call it. It is a problem in many organisations, and in sectors beyond just business. And PwC’s Global Crisis survey alone is ample evidence of it, with listed companies saying they expect to experience a corporate crisis every 12-24 months.

We should be obsessing about the G in ESG—governance. And G, as every reader of this knows, MUST cover far more than E and S to be effective. Only if we address G will trust and confidence in business and capitalism be restored. Tinkering and, worse still, greenwashing make matters worse. They fuel cynicism, destroy trust, and undermine faith in capitalism. So, what are the root causes of the problem? And what might the solutions be?

This is the “systems thinking capabilities gap”, which exists in almost all organisations

During May, the Enlightened Enterprise Academy ran three live events, collectively titled “The Global Governance and Risk Crisis Trilogy of Dialogues.” The first, with Elliot S. Schreiber (a former senior executive of Dupont, Nortel Networks and Bayer), and Oonagh Harpur (a governance veteran with over four decades spent in CEO, chair and NED roles), focused on the question, “Are boards getting the information they need on strategy, culture, and risk?”

It quickly became clear that far too often boards do not even know what information they need, or what questions they need to be asking. Elliot and Oonagh agreed that, based on their experience, many directors are not even clear what their role is.

What does section 172 mean in practice?

Company law and guidance from regulators clearly spells out what the role and responsibility of the board is. So, there is no reason for directors not to know. But what, in practice, does the wording of section 172 of the Companies Act mean?

It says “A director of a company must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole” and with regard for “the likely consequences of any decision in the long term.”

Directors must consider “the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment” and “the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct,” and “the need to act fairly as between members of the company.”

Create and maintain a value scheme that maps what value means from the perspective of each stakeholder group

Clearly, this means many things that need to be unpacked in more detail than I can go into here. So let me suggest that, in practice, it boils down to: knowing what value the organisation creates, for whom, and how. Also, the answers to these questions should have a future focus. And it means understanding and managing the associated risks. This understanding is “most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole” and address the other requirements.

If you are a board member, you might like to consider whether you and your board can answer these questions. I would be amazed if your conclusion was positive. My own experience, plus the verdicts reached by Oonagh and Elliot, are the reason I would be surprised. But, herein, we can find solutions to this global governance crisis. We can ensure boards are able to answer these questions as a starting point.

Yin and yang

In his book, The Yin & Yang of Reputation Management, Elliot proposes the creation of a permanent executive group, sponsored by and answerable to the board, called a “strategy and stakeholder executive group”. It would consist of senior representatives from all stakeholder facing functions.

Its first task would be to create and maintain a value scheme that maps what value means from the perspective of each stakeholder group. This would transform governance from being top-down to being both top-down and bottom-up. It would also be both outside-in and inside-out. We could say it is multidisciplinary and multidimensional governance. And it can apply to strategy, innovation, and risk management with the support of the same group.

Elliot has tried and tested the approach in large corporations and organisations in other sectors. It works.

A systemic approach

It is not hard to see how and why it works. It deals with the problems caused by a top-down approach, by functional siloes, and by a narrow, financial, definition of value. It is a systemic approach to continuous, iterative, value creation. And it helps address what I call the “systems thinking capabilities gap”, which exists in almost all organisations.

Being sponsored by and answerable to the board, this approach would give the board a more comprehensive understanding of the organisation. Boards may then start to govern properly. The added benefit, which should never become the core purpose, is that corporate reporting will also be far easier.

Paul Barnett is founder and CEO of the Enlightened Enterprise Academy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Corporate reporting best practice
    October 1, 2019

    Overview of best practices in corporate reporting for FTSE 350 companies in 2019

  • NBIM says China should tighten rules on corporate ESG reporting
    June 15, 2021
    Chinese flag in front of skyscrapers

    Norges Bank Investment Management suggests Chinese firms would benefit from ESG guidance that refers to recognised international frameworks.

  • ESG reporting all-important in stakeholder engagement
    July 7, 2022
    stocks, asset management, shares, investor engagement

    Experts advise that by boosting their annual reporting, boards can build trust and form more meaningful relationships with investors.

  • Greenwashing threatens shareholders’ interests
    July 4, 2022
    greenwash

    ‘Companies that believe their own greenwash are embedding liability and storing up risk’, warns chair of UK Environment Agency.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

corporate governance, corporate reporting, ESG, section 172, stakeholder value, stakeholders

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
  • Virtual AGMs fall out of favour
  • Cyber security reporting falls short
  • How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
  • Consumers judge a company by its ‘morality’

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|