Skip to content

9 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Focus on the ‘G’ of ESG

by Paul Barnett

Listening to what stakeholders define as valuable is the key to successful governance—and it will make corporate reporting much easier, too.

governance

Image: Fizkes/Shutterstock.com

ESG (environmental, social, and governance) is getting much criticism these days, as did CSR (corporate social responsibility), which it replaced. More generally, corporate reporting is becoming something of a “dog’s dinner”. And the problem is getting worse.

These issues distract attention from the real issue: “the global governance crisis”, as I call it. It is a problem in many organisations, and in sectors beyond just business. And PwC’s Global Crisis survey alone is ample evidence of it, with listed companies saying they expect to experience a corporate crisis every 12-24 months.

We should be obsessing about the G in ESG—governance. And G, as every reader of this knows, MUST cover far more than E and S to be effective. Only if we address G will trust and confidence in business and capitalism be restored. Tinkering and, worse still, greenwashing make matters worse. They fuel cynicism, destroy trust, and undermine faith in capitalism. So, what are the root causes of the problem? And what might the solutions be?

This is the “systems thinking capabilities gap”, which exists in almost all organisations

During May, the Enlightened Enterprise Academy ran three live events, collectively titled “The Global Governance and Risk Crisis Trilogy of Dialogues.” The first, with Elliot S. Schreiber (a former senior executive of Dupont, Nortel Networks and Bayer), and Oonagh Harpur (a governance veteran with over four decades spent in CEO, chair and NED roles), focused on the question, “Are boards getting the information they need on strategy, culture, and risk?”

It quickly became clear that far too often boards do not even know what information they need, or what questions they need to be asking. Elliot and Oonagh agreed that, based on their experience, many directors are not even clear what their role is.

What does section 172 mean in practice?

Company law and guidance from regulators clearly spells out what the role and responsibility of the board is. So, there is no reason for directors not to know. But what, in practice, does the wording of section 172 of the Companies Act mean?

It says “A director of a company must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole” and with regard for “the likely consequences of any decision in the long term.”

Directors must consider “the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment” and “the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct,” and “the need to act fairly as between members of the company.”

Create and maintain a value scheme that maps what value means from the perspective of each stakeholder group

Clearly, this means many things that need to be unpacked in more detail than I can go into here. So let me suggest that, in practice, it boils down to: knowing what value the organisation creates, for whom, and how. Also, the answers to these questions should have a future focus. And it means understanding and managing the associated risks. This understanding is “most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole” and address the other requirements.

If you are a board member, you might like to consider whether you and your board can answer these questions. I would be amazed if your conclusion was positive. My own experience, plus the verdicts reached by Oonagh and Elliot, are the reason I would be surprised. But, herein, we can find solutions to this global governance crisis. We can ensure boards are able to answer these questions as a starting point.

Yin and yang

In his book, The Yin & Yang of Reputation Management, Elliot proposes the creation of a permanent executive group, sponsored by and answerable to the board, called a “strategy and stakeholder executive group”. It would consist of senior representatives from all stakeholder facing functions.

Its first task would be to create and maintain a value scheme that maps what value means from the perspective of each stakeholder group. This would transform governance from being top-down to being both top-down and bottom-up. It would also be both outside-in and inside-out. We could say it is multidisciplinary and multidimensional governance. And it can apply to strategy, innovation, and risk management with the support of the same group.

Elliot has tried and tested the approach in large corporations and organisations in other sectors. It works.

A systemic approach

It is not hard to see how and why it works. It deals with the problems caused by a top-down approach, by functional siloes, and by a narrow, financial, definition of value. It is a systemic approach to continuous, iterative, value creation. And it helps address what I call the “systems thinking capabilities gap”, which exists in almost all organisations.

Being sponsored by and answerable to the board, this approach would give the board a more comprehensive understanding of the organisation. Boards may then start to govern properly. The added benefit, which should never become the core purpose, is that corporate reporting will also be far easier.

Paul Barnett is founder and CEO of the Enlightened Enterprise Academy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • US corporate governance improvements 'slowed or stagnated' in 2021
    January 13, 2022
    Employees talking outside offices

    Report suggests crisis "fatigue" is eating away at gains made during 2020, with employee issues and ESG highlighted as concerns.

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
    May 25, 2023
    boost audit

    UK watchdog’s proposals include giving audit committees greater reporting responsibilities and addressing ‘overboarding’.

  • Corporate disclosures improved after Covid-19
    August 18, 2023
    Employee returning to the workplace holding a mask

    Although the pandemic devastated economies, companies got better at corporate reporting, researchers in New Zealand found.

  • Audit committees name ESG reporting as top agenda item
    February 14, 2023
    Audit ESG reporting

    US audit committees are focused on sustainability reporting despite ESG becoming a point of friction in US politics.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap