Skip to content

22 September, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Lonely leadership; how governance helps in a crisis; Kerrie Waring to depart ICGN; ESG and...

    • say-on-pay votes Say-on-pay votes lack link to sustainability

      Very few investors use their AGM votes on executive pay as a spur to improve...

    • fast-moving threats ‘Fast-moving threats’ will soon challenge boards, warns CIIA

      Resilience will be required to face a ‘poly-crisis’ of immediate and simultaneous risk issues, internal...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • sustainability into finance

      How to integrate sustainability into financial decision-making

      Proactive leadership and board commitment are essential to transform notions of sustainability into fiscally viable...

    • reporting requirements

      Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • policy on human rights

      Why you need a policy on human rights

      As well as being the right thing to do, this element of a sustainable business...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • reporting requirements

      Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

    • trust matters Ignore trust at your peril

      Consumers and employers expect ethical corporate behaviour—and will vote with their feet when trust is...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • helle bank jorgensen Helle Bank Jørgensen on governance, ESG and how board directors can become stewards of the future

      In spite of ESG toxicity in the US, she remains optimistic that companies are working...

    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

    • Starbucks sign outside shop in Warsaw, Poland DEI policies are targets for litigation, warns US lawyer

      Right-wing activists will continue to sue corporates over diversity, equity and inclusion policies they perceive...

    • CEO churn CEO churn is highest since 2019

      Chief executive appointments in the FTSE 100 are also up—but only 27% of incoming CEOs...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 cover

      G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023

      The G20/OECD principles help policy makers improve the regulatory and institutional framework for corporate governance.

    • stakeholder engagement

      Director Reference Guide: Stakeholder engagement

      Board Agenda's 'Director Reference Guide' for boards on building an honest and trust-based relationship with...

    • IoD Are boards losing control report cover

      Are Boards Losing Control? 2023

      This IoD Centre for Corporate Governance report looks at the biggest challenges facing companies over...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Focus on the ‘G’ of ESG

by Paul Barnett

Listening to what stakeholders define as valuable is the key to successful governance—and it will make corporate reporting much easier, too.

governance

Image: Fizkes/Shutterstock.com

ESG (environmental, social, and governance) is getting much criticism these days, as did CSR (corporate social responsibility), which it replaced. More generally, corporate reporting is becoming something of a “dog’s dinner”. And the problem is getting worse.

These issues distract attention from the real issue: “the global governance crisis”, as I call it. It is a problem in many organisations, and in sectors beyond just business. And PwC’s Global Crisis survey alone is ample evidence of it, with listed companies saying they expect to experience a corporate crisis every 12-24 months.

We should be obsessing about the G in ESG—governance. And G, as every reader of this knows, MUST cover far more than E and S to be effective. Only if we address G will trust and confidence in business and capitalism be restored. Tinkering and, worse still, greenwashing make matters worse. They fuel cynicism, destroy trust, and undermine faith in capitalism. So, what are the root causes of the problem? And what might the solutions be?

This is the “systems thinking capabilities gap”, which exists in almost all organisations

During May, the Enlightened Enterprise Academy ran three live events, collectively titled “The Global Governance and Risk Crisis Trilogy of Dialogues.” The first, with Elliot S. Schreiber (a former senior executive of Dupont, Nortel Networks and Bayer), and Oonagh Harpur (a governance veteran with over four decades spent in CEO, chair and NED roles), focused on the question, “Are boards getting the information they need on strategy, culture, and risk?”

It quickly became clear that far too often boards do not even know what information they need, or what questions they need to be asking. Elliot and Oonagh agreed that, based on their experience, many directors are not even clear what their role is.

What does section 172 mean in practice?

Company law and guidance from regulators clearly spells out what the role and responsibility of the board is. So, there is no reason for directors not to know. But what, in practice, does the wording of section 172 of the Companies Act mean?

It says “A director of a company must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole” and with regard for “the likely consequences of any decision in the long term.”

Directors must consider “the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment” and “the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct,” and “the need to act fairly as between members of the company.”

Create and maintain a value scheme that maps what value means from the perspective of each stakeholder group

Clearly, this means many things that need to be unpacked in more detail than I can go into here. So let me suggest that, in practice, it boils down to: knowing what value the organisation creates, for whom, and how. Also, the answers to these questions should have a future focus. And it means understanding and managing the associated risks. This understanding is “most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole” and address the other requirements.

If you are a board member, you might like to consider whether you and your board can answer these questions. I would be amazed if your conclusion was positive. My own experience, plus the verdicts reached by Oonagh and Elliot, are the reason I would be surprised. But, herein, we can find solutions to this global governance crisis. We can ensure boards are able to answer these questions as a starting point.

Yin and yang

In his book, The Yin & Yang of Reputation Management, Elliot proposes the creation of a permanent executive group, sponsored by and answerable to the board, called a “strategy and stakeholder executive group”. It would consist of senior representatives from all stakeholder facing functions.

Its first task would be to create and maintain a value scheme that maps what value means from the perspective of each stakeholder group. This would transform governance from being top-down to being both top-down and bottom-up. It would also be both outside-in and inside-out. We could say it is multidisciplinary and multidimensional governance. And it can apply to strategy, innovation, and risk management with the support of the same group.

Elliot has tried and tested the approach in large corporations and organisations in other sectors. It works.

A systemic approach

It is not hard to see how and why it works. It deals with the problems caused by a top-down approach, by functional siloes, and by a narrow, financial, definition of value. It is a systemic approach to continuous, iterative, value creation. And it helps address what I call the “systems thinking capabilities gap”, which exists in almost all organisations.

Being sponsored by and answerable to the board, this approach would give the board a more comprehensive understanding of the organisation. Boards may then start to govern properly. The added benefit, which should never become the core purpose, is that corporate reporting will also be far easier.

Paul Barnett is founder and CEO of the Enlightened Enterprise Academy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Stakeholder engagement: it's time to ditch public vs private
    December 13, 2022
    Private vs public companies

    Our radically altered corporate governance landscape, in pursuit of sustainability, requires an updated distinction between types of company.

  • ESG legislation: What are the FRC proposals?
    August 17, 2022
    FRC proposals sustainability ESG

    The FRC has set out its plans to help integrate sustainability into corporate governance, reporting and audit reforms.

  • ESG reporting all-important in stakeholder engagement
    July 7, 2022
    stocks, asset management, shares, investor engagement

    Experts advise that by boosting their annual reporting, boards can build trust and form more meaningful relationships with investors.

  • Call to reform ‘comply-or-explain’ element of governance
    December 14, 2022
    Comply or explain governance

    Academics propose that—if refined—the governance principle and the UK's code will still be fit for purpose.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

corporate governance, corporate reporting, ESG, section 172, stakeholder value, stakeholders

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures
  • G20 backs OECD corporate governance principles
  • Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Shareholder dissent focuses on pay

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|