Skip to content

20 May, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Businessman in tailored suit

      Company credit ratings ‘negatively associated with CEO narcissism’

      Research suggests credit rating agencies perceive companies led by narcissistic chief executives as riskier propositions.

    • Global map with currencies Global minimum corporate tax rate negotiations ‘need a fairer forum’

      US treasury secretary Janet Yellen is in Europe to push for agreement on the deal...

    • Houses of Parliament Government confirms commitment to sustainability disclosure requirements

      The UK will proceed with legislative plans for SDRs, including transition reports, after the proposals...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • AI thinker

      AI decision-making presents new ethical risks

      Businesses are allowing artificial intelligence to make decisions that need a human touch. Boards must...

    • Businessman surrounded by news reporters

      The heavy cost of boardroom disasters

      The size and global reach of modern businesses means that the repercussions of scandals and...

    • Multicolour building blocks

      Parker Review: progress update and priorities for change

      The latest review identifies the work of increasing and maintaining ethnic diversity on UK boards,...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • Businessman in thinker pose

      What’s a company for? Milton Friedman responds

      The ongoing lively debate about corporate purpose has caused me to reflect further on the...

    • Maritime workers protest about the sacking of P&O workers How to sink a reputation: lessons from the P&O Ferries crisis

      The company has destroyed the trust of passengers and employees, and demonstrated the consequences of...

    • Ukraine flag with coding Business concern over cyber attacks rises in wake of Ukraine conflict

      Geopolitical uncertainty is leading firms to boost their defences against cyber attacks. But true digital...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Sir Donald Brydon Sir Donald Brydon on audit reform, career NEDs and board relationships

      While bemoaning the "glacial" pace of audit reform, he hails the pandemic's transformation of communication...

    • Forex graph behind boardroom Webinar: what’s next for boards in financial services?

      Our panel of experts share their thoughts on some of the current and future challenges...

    • Man working remotely Pandemic ‘opened door’ to the use of new boardroom technology

      A recent webinar hosted by Board Agenda and Diligent explored the ways boards are using...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • Businessman in tailored suit Company credit ratings ‘negatively associated with CEO narcissism’

      Research suggests credit rating agencies perceive companies led by narcissistic chief executives as riskier propositions.

    • Business meeting Age-diverse boards associated with less corporate misconduct

      More age diversity, researchers say, could reduce “groupthink” and lead to “more critical judgment of...

    • CEO leaving office after resignation Most CEO ‘resignations’ may actually be terminations

      Retired, resigned or left the company? A Stanford study suggests more chief executives are pushed...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Board Effectiveness: A Survey of the C-Suite

      More than 550 public company C-suite executives share their perspective on their boards’ overall effectiveness,...

    • 2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

      To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) highlights three key themes of the...

    • Annual Review of Corporate Reporting 2020/21

      This report contains the main findings arising from FRC's corporate reporting monitoring work, which is...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

Battle of the boards: risk, ESG and two-tier board structures

by Garry Honey

There is an inherent conflict of interest between main and executive boards, with two different time horizons and two different risk impacts.

Board risk meeting

Image: Blue Planet Studio/Shutterstock.com

So, your risk committee reports to the board and can distinguish between operational and strategic risk—but to which board does it report?

In many international corporations the main board is not the executive board; when incorporated under European law there is often a two-tier board structure. The chief executive and executive board run the company on a quarterly performance basis as operational management, but the chair and main board will supervise shareholder value as they represent shareholder interests, keenly aware of ESG sentiment in attracting and retaining investors.

There is an inherent conflict of interest here between the two boards, not only with two different time horizons but two different risk impacts. There are no easy answers, and invariably compromise is needed from both sides to secure a mutual benefit.

The main board needs to better understand the way the business works as an engine of inputs and outputs, whereas the executive board needs to better understand the expectations of investors regarding ESG and the geopolitics that drives it.

Risk perspectives of main boards and executive boards

Any stakeholder map used by the executive board will balance the interests of primary stakeholders: either as revenue inputs (customers and investors) or cost outputs (employees and suppliers). It will also pay close attention to secondary stakeholder groups who have power and influence such as regulators and media.

Now consider the main board focus of attention: it rests only on investors, present and future, dividend return and sentiment. The main board sees risk only in terms of share price stability and investor confidence, nothing else. The CEO and chair need to bring these two different perspectives into focus to help make informed decisions benefitting the business.

The main board sees risk only in terms of share price stability and investor confidence

The board of P&O Ferries took a commercial decision to reduce operating costs, no doubt under pressure to deliver an operating profit. The parent company, Dubai-based privately owned DP World, had been working with the UK government to win new port operator contracts, but these were jeopardised as a local reputational risk escalated into an international political one. Although P&O Ferries had a representative of DP World on their UK board, their risk assessment for a commercial decision failed to consider collateral damage to the parent company.

Sanctions on Russian goods offer another example of conflict. Supply chains for all kinds of item have been put under strain through taking a major source of raw material out of the equation. If your business needs oil, gas, coal, nickel or fertiliser from Russia then you will be tempted to find a way to secure it, if necessary through any third party willing to supply.

However, your main board will veto any such move as it risks investor flight and long-term reputational damage. Any risk assessment undertaken by the chief risk officer of a two-tier corporation needs to consider not only the type of risk being considered but on which stakeholders it impacts most: customers or shareholders?

Risk perception and communication

 

Differences in risk perception between executive and main board can lead to frustration on both sides.

The executive will berate the main board for insufficient understanding of the nature of the business, especially the constraints of delivering quarterly performance targets designed to deliver investor assurance, where no clouds must be allowed to show on the horizon! Conversely the main board will become with frustrated with an executive board that cannot appreciate the significance of ESG metrics regarding sustainability in the face of climate change. There is an education task on both sides if the two-tier structure is to work optimally.

There is an education task on both sides if the two-tier structure is to work optimally

What is the solution? Improved communication between the two tiers to understand the perspective of the other. It is what Michele Wucker would call “risk empathy”, the ability to see the other person’s point of view. It’s a factor to consider when reaching collective decisions in a boardroom. It helps you better understand where someone is coming from, rather than making assumptions. It is not about the risk itself but on whom it impacts and how they perceive it.

The chair has a duty to ensure that non-executive or independent executives on the main board understand the nature of the business and must ensure rotation of the board to bring in fresh and wise counsel to adequately represent shareholder interests.

The CEO has a duty to ensure that his executive board members understand the investment landscape in which their business operates and the wider ecosystem of resource utilisation and global impact, because this is what drives investor sentiment and influences the main board in its decision-making.

Garry Honey is the founder of reputation risk consultancy Chiron Risk. 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Get ahead of ESG risk and reap the rewards
    October 15, 2018
    ESG Risk

    Environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks are rising to the top of progressive board agendas. Why are these risks gaining attention? How can you enhance…

  • Crisis leadership and the role of the board
    June 18, 2020
    crisis management

    How boards deal with unexpected crises has been strongly tested in recent months. What does it take for leaders to be effective in the heat…

  • Why the whole board needs to be on top of risk management
    January 9, 2017

    Companies with greater board risk oversight involvement achieve better operating performance, says Thomas Keusch.

  • Facebook’s fail: the 'story', the risks and the role of the board
    June 12, 2018
    Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, data harvesting, data ethics

    Cambridge Analytica harvested the data of 50 million Facebook users to help swing the US presidential election, but amid the trend for corporate governance 'narratives',…

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

board responsibilities, board risk oversight, board strategy, ESG, executive directors, Garry Honey, risk, risk appetite

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Ian Dyson named as new chair of the board at Asos
  • What’s a company for? Milton Friedman responds
  • Working from home? Stay alert to the risk of cyber-attacks
  • How to sink a reputation: lessons from the P&O Ferries crisis
  • Growing backlash against ‘inflexible dogma’ of ESG

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|