Skip to content

26 September, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • board control

      Are boards losing control?

      We need to ensure that regulations do not inappropriately reduce a board’s ability to take...

    • audit reform Labour commits to audit reform legislation

      Shadow minister for business, Jonathan Reynolds, says Labour will push through audit reform when in...

    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Lonely leadership; how governance helps in a crisis; Kerrie Waring to depart ICGN; ESG and...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • sustainability into finance

      How to integrate sustainability into financial decision-making

      Proactive leadership and board commitment are essential to transform notions of sustainability into fiscally viable...

    • reporting requirements

      Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • policy on human rights

      Why you need a policy on human rights

      As well as being the right thing to do, this element of a sustainable business...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • board control

      Are boards losing control?

      We need to ensure that regulations do not inappropriately reduce a board’s ability to take...

    • reporting requirements Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • helle bank jorgensen Helle Bank Jørgensen on governance, ESG and how board directors can become stewards of the future

      In spite of ESG toxicity in the US, she remains optimistic that companies are working...

    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

    • Starbucks sign outside shop in Warsaw, Poland DEI policies are targets for litigation, warns US lawyer

      Right-wing activists will continue to sue corporates over diversity, equity and inclusion policies they perceive...

    • CEO churn CEO churn is highest since 2019

      Chief executive appointments in the FTSE 100 are also up—but only 27% of incoming CEOs...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • ciia risk in focus

      Risk in Focus 2024: Hot topics for internal auditors

      Risk in Focus 2024 surveyed chief audit executives on their key challenges: geopolitical uncertainty and cybersecurity...

    • G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 cover

      G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023

      The G20/OECD principles help policy makers improve the regulatory and institutional framework for corporate governance.

    • stakeholder engagement

      Director Reference Guide: Stakeholder engagement

      Board Agenda's 'Director Reference Guide' for boards on building an honest and trust-based relationship with...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

ClientEarth’s climate case against Shell ‘likely to fail’

by Gavin Hinks on April 11, 2022

Corporate governance expert says ClientEarth will struggle to prove Shell’s directors did not consider the “wider interests” of the company.

Shell logo outside a petrol station

Image: siam.pukkato/Shutterstock.com

Legal efforts by a not-for-profit to become the first to demonstrate how board executives have failed in their directors’ duties over climate change are set to fail, according to a corporate governance expert.

Last month environmental campaign group ClientEarth began the process of seeking permission to bring litigation against Shell, claiming the energy giant’s board members had failed in their section 172 duties by failing to “properly prepare” for transition to net zero. “Shell is seriously exposed to the physical and transitional risks of climate change, yet its climate plan is fundamentally flawed,” said Paul Benson, a lawyer with ClientEarth.

But a University of East Anglia academic argues that ClientEarth will likely fail significant legal hurdles before it can bring its case. Writing for the Oxford University corporate governance blog, David Gibbs-Kneller says: “While ClientEarth’s litigation may be novel, once it is appreciated how the court applies discretion, it poses no additional litigation risk that directors and insurers should be concerned with.

“The only outcome this litigation is likely to bring is that ClientEarth will be liable for Shell’s and their own legal costs.”

Shell directors’ duties

Gibbs-Kneller concedes that ClientEarth is able to demonstrate it has a prima facie case, thus passing the first test of being able to proceed. But it is likely to fail when it comes to a second hurdle of the court being satisfied that there are no “mandatory bars” to the case going ahead. The underlying test here is whether the claims are strong enough that “some directors” would push on with them.

“The answer to that question is mostly likely no,” says Gibbs-Kneller. And this because ClientEarth will struggle to prove Shell’s directors did not consider the “wider interests” of the company.

“ClientEarth’s evidence that the [Shell’s climate] strategy may impose increased risk to the company does not evidence they did not have regard to the wider interest of the company or the directors do not believe, in good faith, the strategy will promote the success of the company.

“In fact it is implicit in Shell’s strategy to lower carbon emissions that they have considered those wider interests in discharging their duty to the company.

“No director would consider this claim to be in the company’s interests when the evidence, at best, appears to be speculative.”

Similarly, Gibbs-Kneller says using section 174 of the Companies Act—which says directors must use “reasonable care, skill and diligence”—is also likely to fail. This time because there is no “objective criteria” to assess good judgment in a corporate context.

Shell has defended its position. The company says it is aiming to halve emissions from global operations by 2030. The company’s annual report says its governance is designed to reach net zero by 2050.

However, in May a Dutch court described Shell’s transition plan, approved by 89% of shareholders, as “rather intangible, undefined and non-binding”. The ruling added: “The court concludes that RDS [Royal Dutch Shell] is obliged to reduce the CO2 emissions of the Shell group’s activities by net 45% at end 2030, relative to 2019, through the Shell group’s corporate policy.” It added that the obligation “relates to the Shell group’s entire energy portfolio and to the aggregate volume of all emissions”.

This is not the first time legal experts have highlighted the difficulties in using section 172 as a stick to beat climate laggards. Others have pointed out the law is a blunt instrument while the enforcement regime around it is inadequate for the task.

Stakeholder interests

Section 172 has also been the focus of much attention in recent years, though most of that concern is focused on what is perceived as the law’s insufficient attention to stakeholder interests.

In January the Trades Union Congress (TUC) called for the law to be reformed because the balance of company interests have swung too far towards shareholders “and away from working people who create wealth”.

Last year the Better Business Act campaign was launched also calling for reform of section 172. With members as high-profile as John Lewis and Innocent Drinks, the campaign seeks to changes a core part of directors’ legal duties from seeking the “success” of a company to “purpose of the company”.

The climate crisis remains the single biggest issue for politicians, regulators, company leaders and investors alike. While it does, pressure will continue on companies to adjust. Seeking recourse to the law seems an obvious route to achieve. However, as Gibbs-Kneller illustrates, it may not be as easy as it seems.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Shell faces shareholder litigation over climate risk
    March 15, 2022
    Shell logo

    Campaign group ClientEarth claims board members have breached their directors’ duties by failing to “properly prepare” for climate change.

  • FRC says climate disclosures are 'failing to meet investor expectations'
    September 11, 2021
    Climate disclosures warning sign

    Review by the UK regulator finds there is "little evidence" that business models and strategy are being influenced by climate considerations.

  • Climate disclosures 'unlikely to drive a green transition'
    October 2, 2021
    Melting ice cap

    Academics say climate reporting is likely to be less effective than direct regulatory interventions such as taxation or emissions trading.

  • SEC set to issue proposals on US climate change disclosures
    March 14, 2022
    SEC seal

    Three-quarters of the 550 responses to the SEC consultation are said to be in support of mandatory climate reporting.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

ClientEarth, climate change, climate risk, ESG, legislation, Royal Dutch Shell, section 172

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ‘Fast-moving threats’ will soon challenge boards, warns CIIA
  • Meta faces US lawsuit over its corporate governance
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • How to integrate sustainability into financial decision-making
  • Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|