Skip to content

15 May, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • leadership on AI

      How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

    • canada tariffs

      Corporate governance to the fore in Canada

      As Canada responds to the tariff conditions set by the US, companies need to take...

    • AI will transform

      4 ways AI will transform board dynamics

      Opportunities and challenges are arising from the integration of artificial intelligence into corporate governance.

  • Comment
      • View all
    • leadership on AI

      How to get ahead on AI leadership

      The question isn’t how AI will change business—it’s whether leaders can harness it to drive...

    • canada tariffs Corporate governance to the fore in Canada

      As Canada responds to the tariff conditions set by the US, companies need to take...

    • meritocracy Fairness makes for meritocracy

      Favouring actions over persuasion, boards can take small yet extremely effective steps to improve diversity,...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • ai boards Corporate world has a ‘huge appetite’ for artificial intelligence

      AI could change boardrooms to the extent that directors’ duties would change too, a panel...

    • EU non-financial reporting reforms are an ‘opportunity’

      Firms can take advantage of the delayed implementation of CSRD and CSDDD to take stock...

  • Career
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board & Governance Services
    • Director Reference Guide: Fostering the board-CEO relationship

      This Board Agenda Director Reference Guide on fostering the board-CEO relationship provides practical advice to...

    • Forvis Mazars AI 2025

      Performance Pulse: Are UK businesses prepared for AI?

      Forvis Mazars measured the AI preparedness of more than 300 UK businesses: 97% say they're...

    • Parker review cover

      Improving the Ethnic Diversity of UK Business, Parker Review update 2025

      The 2025 Parker Review update report, supported by EY. Over the past year, significant progress...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Audit committees and ESG: ‘It’s a difficult journey to navigate’

by Gavin Hinks

The rise of ESG as an investor concern is creating new demands of audit committees. A recent CACID event looked at the challenges.

CACID discussion on audit committees and ESG

Image: Mazars

In case there were any doubts about the role of audit committees in the implementation of ESG, stewardship and governance expert Hans-Christoph Hirt dispels them in a few short words.

Hirt says ESG is now an integral part of risk management and financial statements. And that places the subject firmly in the realm of the audit committee. “Absolutely, there should be a role for the audit committees overseeing ESG,” he says.

Hirt, executive director of EOS Federated Hermes, was speaking at the latest Centre for Audit Committee and Investor Dialogue (CACID) panel discussion, organised by professional services firm Mazars. The topic: the role of audit committees in environmental, social and governance (ESG) policies.

ESG has become a major issue for companies as they implement policies designed to help tackle the climate crisis and respond to calls for a societal purpose rather than simply pursue profit. The importance of ESG was further underlined by the pandemic as companies moved to support the welfare of employees hit by lockdowns.

The panel explored the work of audit committees, the nature of their responsibilities, how they engage with stakeholders and the role assurance can play in the implementation of ESG reporting.

“Many companies will find they don’t need specialist expertise in ESG, but all members will need to go up the learning curve on training”

—Shonaid Jemmett-Page, audit committee chair at QinetiQ

Addressing ESG naturally raises a question about the need for specialist skills. Panelists agreed that audit committee members would need to up their game and bolster their knowledge base. But they may not need specialists.

“Many companies will find they don’t need specialist expertise in ESG,” said Shonaid Jemmett-Page, a non-executive director with Aviva and audit committee chair at QinetiQ, “but all members will need to go up the learning curve on training.”

Activity levels on ESG have increased in recent times she added, with pressure from investors to understand policies on emissions and climate. This is not just about managing threats: some companies see opportunities too. “I see real momentum behind this,” she said. “Doing this properly is going to be part of your licence to operate, going forward.”

New reporting standards

Perhaps the biggest challenge for audit committee members is coming to terms with the raft of reporting systems about to hit companies with demands for new ESG disclosures. Europe is working on a new sustainability reporting directive and COP26 in Glasgow saw the launch of the International Sustainability Standards Board to develop its own reporting scheme.

These two processes could appear to be in competition. But Maud Gaudry, global head of sustainability at Mazars, says not. The European project is broad and deep, while the ISSB project is narrow; but they are complementary.

“We tend to present the two as being competing initiatives. That’s not the right way to describe them because they have a lot of things in common,” she said. Europe’s priority, she added, would be to produce standards compatible with the ISSB approach “so that any given international company won’t have to produce two sets of different sustainability information”.

While Europe and the ISSB projects move forward, companies in the UK are already managing mandatory reporting using a framework from the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). It adds to a complicated landscape of reporting systems at a time when finance departments would perhaps prefer a single set of standards to work with.

“We have to be honest about the fact that today, it’s a difficult journey to navigate for companies”

—Maud Gaudry, Mazars

According to Leïla Kamdem, head of climate risk at HSBC, systems will come together, but in the meantime companies will find it hard work. “We are definitely going to get convergence at some point,” said Kamdem. “But we have to be honest about the fact that today, it’s a difficult journey to navigate for companies.”

But it won’t just be reporting for external readers that will be difficult. Internal reporting presents its own challenges. Companies are at different stages, usually starting with carbon emissions as a baseline on which they can build targets.

That raises questions about the extent to which audit committees can hold their own companies to account on ESG. For Jemmett-Page, the current era is witness to an evolving role for audit committees.

“Ten years ago they generally dealt with financial risks and systems of control. Now, more and more, they should be focusing on the total framework of risk managements and controls, financial and non-financial, and obviously, ESG sits in that.”

Net-zero transition plans

And that will include examination of net-zero transition plans, set to become a disclosure requirement in the UK from 2023. “It’s an urgent issue,” said Kamdem, “that the audit committee should be targeting on top of making sure they have robust strategies in place to manage the transition to reduce emissions in line with the net zero pathway.”

Not every element of ESG is progressing at the same pace. For obvious reasons the “E”, (environment), has received much of the focus. The “S” (social) element, especially, is still developing, even though the pandemic may have added weight to the argument companies must increase their activities in relation to employees and communities.

“The audit committee should be… making sure they have robust strategies in place to manage the transition to reduce emissions in line with the net zero pathway”

—Leïla Kamdem, HSBC

That places some constraints on what audit committees can achieve on the topic. Cultural differences mean social practices and expectations can differ from one country to another, making it difficult to define acceptable universal standards. Gaudry observed audit committees are “anxious” about the quality of data, its robustness and relevance.

But that is not to say the “S” is not writ large for corporates. Kamdem noted that climate goals integrate with the social and governance agenda. “I don’t think it would be responsible for companies to [transition to net zero] without considering the impact on communities and the countries and markets in which we operate,” she said.

Tools and standards for ESG assurance

Another element of ESG still evolving is assurance. Gaudry said at the moment the “appropriate tool” is yet to be defined for widespread assurance of ESG. And because of the lack of universal standards, many companies are currently taking a pass.

However, draft European legislation would eventually demand assurance. And that will require a new set of skills, especially from assurance providers. “We’re going to have to train a lot of people very fast,” Gaudry added.

But things will change. Jemmett-Page said the growing importance of climate data would force the development of standard setting, audit and the audit profession “to progress very fast.”

“It has to,” she said. “The investment markets will demand it.”

One corporate process that will have a big role over ESG is internal audit. Jemmett-Page said internal audit may not possess expertise, but it should ensure there is a “framework of risk management control” in place to deal with ESG.

Gaudry agreed. “You can’t have the level of comfort you need without having your internal audit team being involved.”

Audit committees under scrutiny

ESG concerns are here to stay and now deeply embedded in both public and investor consciousness. Inevitably regulators and policymakers will drive through new requirements that will enter into the risk deliberations of companies and their audit committees.

That will create new demands of audit committee members and they will be under scrutiny. Hans-Christoph Hirt placed the role of audit committees into perspective.

“It is really important to get to know the audit committee to some degree, really understand how they are comfortable signing off financial accounts, how they have assessed the risk and the risk management framework.

“Do they really understand what they’re doing? Can they challenge management and specialists enough? That’s key.

“Investors just need to know that financial accounts reflect all material topics, and climate is the number one concern.”

Watch the panel discussion here.

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Audit committees name ESG reporting as top agenda item
    February 14, 2023
    Audit ESG reporting

    US audit committees are focused on sustainability reporting despite ESG becoming a point of friction in US politics.

  • Audit committees and ESG: 10 key observations
    March 25, 2022
    Board members discussing ESG

    With ESG and climate risk concerns set to increase, the role of the audit committee is being watched closely by investors.

  • Audit committees 'lose independence' the longer they serve
    September 1, 2021
    notebook on boardroom table

    Study finds committees in troubled firms have fewer female members, more outside directorships, greater shareholdings and longer tenures.

  • Audit committee chairs 'are confusing quality of audit and quality of service'
    February 2, 2022
    Calculator on top of business report

    FRC report also warns that audit committee chairs have a "negative perception of joint audits", despite this being a key reform proposal.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

audit, Audit committees, CACID, Dr Hans-Christoph Hirt, ESG, Leïla Kamdem, Maud Gaudry, mazars, Shonaid Jemmett-Page

Search


Follow Us

Boardroom Intelligence

Stay in the know and register for free to receive our essential Boardroom Intelligence Briefing featuring:

  • Top governance headlines, expert opinion & boardroom insights, exclusive whitepapers & strategy guides, delivered to your inbox every week – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

By registering you will be able to access one premium article each month, selected partner newsletters and content, plus updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board & Governance Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap