Skip to content

12 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Could dual-class shares resuscitate the London Stock Exchange?

by Bobby Reddy on February 15, 2022

US evidence has shown that dual-class firms outperform their one share, one vote brethren. London needs to take a more global view.

London Stock Exchange

Image: Chrispictures/Shutterstock.com

The spurt of listings on the London bourse in 2021 should not mask the secular decline of the London Stock Exchange. In the last 20 years, exits have consistently outstripped new IPOs. Although some have noted that the diminishing numbers of listed companies is a global phenomenon, the London Stock Exchange has, unlike for example the NYSE, seen its ratio of market capitalisation to GDP remain stagnant. By any measure, London has not been doing well. However, recently moves have been made to resuscitate the market, with the opening-up of the exchange to dual-class shares being the headline act. Could dual-class shares resuscitate the London Stock Exchange?

Why dual-class shares?

With dual-class shares a founder of a company can be granted multiple voting rights per share, enabling the retention of control even after listing and otherwise relinquishing a majority financial interest in the company. The US has seen a spate of companies, especially in the tech industry, adopting dual-class shares. Alphabet, Meta, Snap, Airbnb, Peloton and Zoom are all examples of high-profile tech companies that have adopted dual-class shares in the US. With tech companies having driven the performance of US exchanges in recent years, these are exactly the types of exciting, innovative companies that could turbo-charge the London Stock Exchange.

Encouraging long-term outlooks could rebalance the London Stock Exchange toward “growth companies”

Dual-class shares can benefit innovative, high-growth tech companies. Such “new economy” companies are often disruptive businesses run by visionary founders, and it can be challenging for those companies to effectively convey their future prospects and strategies to public shareholders. Without dual-class shares, founders of such companies are fearful that a public listing pursuant to which a majority of the shares are distributed to public shareholders, could expose the founders. If share price is moribund as a result of those public shareholders not fully appreciating the value of balancing short-term profits with long-term investment and R&D, the founders could be ousted from the company or the company could become the subject of an opportunistic takeover.

As well as attracting companies to the market, dual-class shares can also benefit companies after they have listed. Asset managers have, in some cases unfairly, in some cases wholly justified, faced accusations of taking a short-term approach to their investments. In turn, that approach can lead to boards of one share, one vote companies taking a similar short-term perspective, influenced by the voting control of those asset managers. In contrast, with dual-class shares, founders can take a longer-term view without having to kowtow to the short-term proclivities of investors. Encouraging long-term outlooks could rebalance the London Stock Exchange toward “growth companies” rather than the “income companies” that dominate the market, thereby increasing the overall value of the exchange.

LSE’s dual-class shares lite

When it comes to dual-class shares, though, many UK institutional investors subscribe to the adage “if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is”. Power without responsibility can lead to abuse, and concern exists that a founder with total control, but very little economic interest in a company, can manage that company in a manner that exploits public shareholders for his or her personal benefit. Accordingly, the recent reforms attach conditions to the use of dual-class shares that potentially limit their misuse.

However, those conditions have gone too far. The constraints that have been imposed go far beyond those voluntarily attached to typical dual-class shares in the US, and even surpass the cautious approaches of Hong Kong, Singapore and Shanghai which have all recently opened their doors to dual-class shares.

The constraints are likely to deter the very early-stage tech companies that the new rules are designed to attract

In particular, the London Stock Exchange’s premium tier only permits dual-class shares that enable founders to block takeovers, and, even then, for only five years. Although a founder can additionally protect his or her position on the board, he or she cannot use dual-class shares to protect his or her management role as, for example, a CEO. Furthermore, the approval of public shareholders will still be required for dual-class share premium-listed companies to engage in large transactions, which can hamper the progress of the acquisition hungry companies that often define Big Tech.

The constraints are so severe that they are likely to deter the very early-stage tech companies that the new rules are designed to attract. Why would founders be drawn to “dual-class shares lite” when they have so many other options, whether that be selling-out to larger, often foreign, companies, or listing on more welcoming overseas exchanges?

Lack of ambition

Proportionate constraints around the use of dual-class shares are sensible, but overly severe restraints curtail the very benefits the reforms are intended to achieve. In my recent book, I discuss a different approach to dual-class shares that could be more effective in attracting tech companies to London while at the same time respecting the need to protect investor rights.

The regulators have though been heavily influenced by the UK institutional investors who hold great sway in policy circles. London needs to take a more holistic, global view to competitiveness. US evidence has shown that dual-class firms outperform their one share, one vote brethren. By railing against dual-class shares for largely ideological reasons, the institutional investor community is cutting off its nose to spite its face, and consequently limiting the returns of beneficiaries.

Whereas the last few years has seen overseas exchanges riding a tide of tech driven success, the London Stock Exchange is in decline, and with its mining, financial, manufacturing and retail bias it is in danger of being stuck in time. Dropping the ball with dual-class shares is a microcosm of the lack of ambition that is required to bring the London Stock Exchange back to relevance. It is time for broad minds and big ideas.

Bobby Reddy is an assistant professor at the University of Cambridge and a former partner at Latham & Watkins. He is the author of Founders without Limits: Dual-Class Stock and the Premium Tier of the London Stock Exchange.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Dual-class shares have become 'dual-class stock lite'
    May 23, 2023
    London Stock Exchange, LSE

    A consultation is under way on dual-class share rules after changes in 2021 'unlikely to move the needle' on attracting new listings to London.

  • Dual-class shares ‘would enhance investor protection’
    September 20, 2021
    London Stock Exchange

    Allowing dual-class shares on London’s premium market would provide a “higher level of regulatory protections” for minority shareholders, says Min Yan.

  • Dual-class shares ‘would enhance investor protection’
    September 20, 2021
    London Stock Exchange

    Allowing dual-class shares on London’s premium market would provide a “higher level of regulatory protections” for minority shareholders, says Min Yan.

  • Research reveals Silicon Valley's growing appetite for dual-class shares
    February 11, 2022
    Map showing Silicon Valley area of San Francisco

    US tech companies are less likely than S&P 100 firms to have dual CEO-chairs, but they continue to push ahead on dual-class shares.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap