Skip to content

21 March, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • BlackRock Larry Fink

      Larry Fink puts focus on finance and inflation

      Although BlackRock’s CEO does not mention the term ‘ESG’ in his annual letter, he highlights...

    • woke silicon valley bank News round-up: this week in governance

      GOP declares SVB ‘woke’; banks slow to sustainability; fund managers accused of dodging voting risks;...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • data decision

      How to boost decision making

      Innovative digital tools can help boards to deliver against strategic objectives, but it is the...

    • remote working

      Navigating the new world of work

      Firms need to focus on building an inclusive environment and a culture of trust to...

    • digital transformation

      Digital transformation: Get the basics right

      Board involvement at the get-go will boost the chances of a successful digital transformation for...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uncertainty in 2023

      Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty

      Agility, planning in the shorter term and bravery will all stand chief executives in good...

    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • female ceo Less than a third of FTSE 100 executives are women

      In Europe as a whole, only 7.7% of top companies’ chief executives are female, gender...

    • board size Performance declines as boards grow in size

      Researchers found that investment dropped by 2-3 percentage points as companies passed from 12 to...

    • Silicon Valley governance Silicon Valley improves its governance

      Big technology companies are stealing a march over other top corporates when it comes to...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Gender diversity barometer

      Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe

      The 2023 Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe looks at the 16...

    • geopolitical risk airmic

      Navigating geopolitical risk

      Today, the future feels less secure, and optimism is more restrained. Taking decisions in an...

    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Could dual-class shares resuscitate the London Stock Exchange?

by Bobby Reddy on February 15, 2022

US evidence has shown that dual-class firms outperform their one share, one vote brethren. London needs to take a more global view.

London Stock Exchange

Image: Chrispictures/Shutterstock.com

The spurt of listings on the London bourse in 2021 should not mask the secular decline of the London Stock Exchange. In the last 20 years, exits have consistently outstripped new IPOs. Although some have noted that the diminishing numbers of listed companies is a global phenomenon, the London Stock Exchange has, unlike for example the NYSE, seen its ratio of market capitalisation to GDP remain stagnant. By any measure, London has not been doing well. However, recently moves have been made to resuscitate the market, with the opening-up of the exchange to dual-class shares being the headline act. Could dual-class shares resuscitate the London Stock Exchange?

Why dual-class shares?

With dual-class shares a founder of a company can be granted multiple voting rights per share, enabling the retention of control even after listing and otherwise relinquishing a majority financial interest in the company. The US has seen a spate of companies, especially in the tech industry, adopting dual-class shares. Alphabet, Meta, Snap, Airbnb, Peloton and Zoom are all examples of high-profile tech companies that have adopted dual-class shares in the US. With tech companies having driven the performance of US exchanges in recent years, these are exactly the types of exciting, innovative companies that could turbo-charge the London Stock Exchange.

Encouraging long-term outlooks could rebalance the London Stock Exchange toward “growth companies”

Dual-class shares can benefit innovative, high-growth tech companies. Such “new economy” companies are often disruptive businesses run by visionary founders, and it can be challenging for those companies to effectively convey their future prospects and strategies to public shareholders. Without dual-class shares, founders of such companies are fearful that a public listing pursuant to which a majority of the shares are distributed to public shareholders, could expose the founders. If share price is moribund as a result of those public shareholders not fully appreciating the value of balancing short-term profits with long-term investment and R&D, the founders could be ousted from the company or the company could become the subject of an opportunistic takeover.

As well as attracting companies to the market, dual-class shares can also benefit companies after they have listed. Asset managers have, in some cases unfairly, in some cases wholly justified, faced accusations of taking a short-term approach to their investments. In turn, that approach can lead to boards of one share, one vote companies taking a similar short-term perspective, influenced by the voting control of those asset managers. In contrast, with dual-class shares, founders can take a longer-term view without having to kowtow to the short-term proclivities of investors. Encouraging long-term outlooks could rebalance the London Stock Exchange toward “growth companies” rather than the “income companies” that dominate the market, thereby increasing the overall value of the exchange.

LSE’s dual-class shares lite

When it comes to dual-class shares, though, many UK institutional investors subscribe to the adage “if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is”. Power without responsibility can lead to abuse, and concern exists that a founder with total control, but very little economic interest in a company, can manage that company in a manner that exploits public shareholders for his or her personal benefit. Accordingly, the recent reforms attach conditions to the use of dual-class shares that potentially limit their misuse.

However, those conditions have gone too far. The constraints that have been imposed go far beyond those voluntarily attached to typical dual-class shares in the US, and even surpass the cautious approaches of Hong Kong, Singapore and Shanghai which have all recently opened their doors to dual-class shares.

The constraints are likely to deter the very early-stage tech companies that the new rules are designed to attract

In particular, the London Stock Exchange’s premium tier only permits dual-class shares that enable founders to block takeovers, and, even then, for only five years. Although a founder can additionally protect his or her position on the board, he or she cannot use dual-class shares to protect his or her management role as, for example, a CEO. Furthermore, the approval of public shareholders will still be required for dual-class share premium-listed companies to engage in large transactions, which can hamper the progress of the acquisition hungry companies that often define Big Tech.

The constraints are so severe that they are likely to deter the very early-stage tech companies that the new rules are designed to attract. Why would founders be drawn to “dual-class shares lite” when they have so many other options, whether that be selling-out to larger, often foreign, companies, or listing on more welcoming overseas exchanges?

Lack of ambition

Proportionate constraints around the use of dual-class shares are sensible, but overly severe restraints curtail the very benefits the reforms are intended to achieve. In my recent book, I discuss a different approach to dual-class shares that could be more effective in attracting tech companies to London while at the same time respecting the need to protect investor rights.

The regulators have though been heavily influenced by the UK institutional investors who hold great sway in policy circles. London needs to take a more holistic, global view to competitiveness. US evidence has shown that dual-class firms outperform their one share, one vote brethren. By railing against dual-class shares for largely ideological reasons, the institutional investor community is cutting off its nose to spite its face, and consequently limiting the returns of beneficiaries.

Whereas the last few years has seen overseas exchanges riding a tide of tech driven success, the London Stock Exchange is in decline, and with its mining, financial, manufacturing and retail bias it is in danger of being stuck in time. Dropping the ball with dual-class shares is a microcosm of the lack of ambition that is required to bring the London Stock Exchange back to relevance. It is time for broad minds and big ideas.

Bobby Reddy is an assistant professor at the University of Cambridge and a former partner at Latham & Watkins. He is the author of Founders without Limits: Dual-Class Stock and the Premium Tier of the London Stock Exchange.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Dual-class shares ‘would enhance investor protection’
    September 20, 2021
    London Stock Exchange

    Allowing dual-class shares on London’s premium market would provide a “higher level of regulatory protections” for minority shareholders, says Min Yan.

  • Dual-class shares ‘would enhance investor protection’
    September 20, 2021
    London Stock Exchange

    Allowing dual-class shares on London’s premium market would provide a “higher level of regulatory protections” for minority shareholders, says Min Yan.

  • Research reveals Silicon Valley's growing appetite for dual-class shares
    February 11, 2022
    Map showing Silicon Valley area of San Francisco

    US tech companies are less likely than S&P 100 firms to have dual CEO-chairs, but they continue to push ahead on dual-class shares.

  • Ann-marie Murphy joins The Gym Group board
    April 22, 2022
    The Gym Group logo

    Murphy joined the company in April 2018 as director of people and development, and became chief operating officer earlier this year.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Bobby Reddy, dual-class share structure, dual-class shares, listing rules, London Stock Exchange, tech companies

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ESG resilience requires leaders to manage without certainty
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty
  • Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’
  • How to boost decision making

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|