Skip to content

19 August, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • FRC proposals sustainability ESG

      ESG legislation: What are the FRC proposals?

      The FRC has set out its plans to help integrate sustainability into corporate governance, reporting...

    • business transformation Business transformation is a priority now, say experts

      As business survival depends on adapting to the changing post-pandemic economic landscape, it's as well...

    • cyber disclosure Are cyber disclosure demands too high?

      Organisations increasingly struggle with cybersecurity as they balance fear of reputational damage against cyber disclosure...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • FRC proposals sustainability ESG

      ESG legislation: What are the FRC proposals?

      The FRC has set out its plans to help integrate sustainability into corporate governance, reporting...

    • short selling investors

      How to beat short selling activism

      What would you do if your company was targeted by short-selling activist investors? Communication is...

    • ESG debate

      The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

      The issues boards face are rarely straightforward, and ESG is no exception. It is time...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • cyber disclosure

      Are cyber disclosure demands too high?

      Organisations increasingly struggle with cybersecurity as they balance fear of reputational damage against cyber disclosure...

    • global warming ESG is not a ‘distraction’

      We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society...

    • Man with magnifying glass The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

      Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      PwC fined for BT audit; greenwashing sanctions; cost of living crisis; $300m pay deal; US...

    • US boards diversity US boards slow diversity with poor retirement policies

      Only 6% of organisations have term limits for directors, and there is reluctance around mandatory...

    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Tory leadership contest; Grant Thornton fined; Norwegian insider dealing; virtual AGMs; US environmental disclosures; diversity...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

Could dual-class shares resuscitate the London Stock Exchange?

by Bobby Reddy on February 15, 2022

US evidence has shown that dual-class firms outperform their one share, one vote brethren. London needs to take a more global view.

London Stock Exchange

Image: Chrispictures/Shutterstock.com

The spurt of listings on the London bourse in 2021 should not mask the secular decline of the London Stock Exchange. In the last 20 years, exits have consistently outstripped new IPOs. Although some have noted that the diminishing numbers of listed companies is a global phenomenon, the London Stock Exchange has, unlike for example the NYSE, seen its ratio of market capitalisation to GDP remain stagnant. By any measure, London has not been doing well. However, recently moves have been made to resuscitate the market, with the opening-up of the exchange to dual-class shares being the headline act. Could dual-class shares resuscitate the London Stock Exchange?

Why dual-class shares?

With dual-class shares a founder of a company can be granted multiple voting rights per share, enabling the retention of control even after listing and otherwise relinquishing a majority financial interest in the company. The US has seen a spate of companies, especially in the tech industry, adopting dual-class shares. Alphabet, Meta, Snap, Airbnb, Peloton and Zoom are all examples of high-profile tech companies that have adopted dual-class shares in the US. With tech companies having driven the performance of US exchanges in recent years, these are exactly the types of exciting, innovative companies that could turbo-charge the London Stock Exchange.

Encouraging long-term outlooks could rebalance the London Stock Exchange toward “growth companies”

Dual-class shares can benefit innovative, high-growth tech companies. Such “new economy” companies are often disruptive businesses run by visionary founders, and it can be challenging for those companies to effectively convey their future prospects and strategies to public shareholders. Without dual-class shares, founders of such companies are fearful that a public listing pursuant to which a majority of the shares are distributed to public shareholders, could expose the founders. If share price is moribund as a result of those public shareholders not fully appreciating the value of balancing short-term profits with long-term investment and R&D, the founders could be ousted from the company or the company could become the subject of an opportunistic takeover.

As well as attracting companies to the market, dual-class shares can also benefit companies after they have listed. Asset managers have, in some cases unfairly, in some cases wholly justified, faced accusations of taking a short-term approach to their investments. In turn, that approach can lead to boards of one share, one vote companies taking a similar short-term perspective, influenced by the voting control of those asset managers. In contrast, with dual-class shares, founders can take a longer-term view without having to kowtow to the short-term proclivities of investors. Encouraging long-term outlooks could rebalance the London Stock Exchange toward “growth companies” rather than the “income companies” that dominate the market, thereby increasing the overall value of the exchange.

LSE’s dual-class shares lite

When it comes to dual-class shares, though, many UK institutional investors subscribe to the adage “if something sounds too good to be true, it probably is”. Power without responsibility can lead to abuse, and concern exists that a founder with total control, but very little economic interest in a company, can manage that company in a manner that exploits public shareholders for his or her personal benefit. Accordingly, the recent reforms attach conditions to the use of dual-class shares that potentially limit their misuse.

However, those conditions have gone too far. The constraints that have been imposed go far beyond those voluntarily attached to typical dual-class shares in the US, and even surpass the cautious approaches of Hong Kong, Singapore and Shanghai which have all recently opened their doors to dual-class shares.

The constraints are likely to deter the very early-stage tech companies that the new rules are designed to attract

In particular, the London Stock Exchange’s premium tier only permits dual-class shares that enable founders to block takeovers, and, even then, for only five years. Although a founder can additionally protect his or her position on the board, he or she cannot use dual-class shares to protect his or her management role as, for example, a CEO. Furthermore, the approval of public shareholders will still be required for dual-class share premium-listed companies to engage in large transactions, which can hamper the progress of the acquisition hungry companies that often define Big Tech.

The constraints are so severe that they are likely to deter the very early-stage tech companies that the new rules are designed to attract. Why would founders be drawn to “dual-class shares lite” when they have so many other options, whether that be selling-out to larger, often foreign, companies, or listing on more welcoming overseas exchanges?

Lack of ambition

Proportionate constraints around the use of dual-class shares are sensible, but overly severe restraints curtail the very benefits the reforms are intended to achieve. In my recent book, I discuss a different approach to dual-class shares that could be more effective in attracting tech companies to London while at the same time respecting the need to protect investor rights.

The regulators have though been heavily influenced by the UK institutional investors who hold great sway in policy circles. London needs to take a more holistic, global view to competitiveness. US evidence has shown that dual-class firms outperform their one share, one vote brethren. By railing against dual-class shares for largely ideological reasons, the institutional investor community is cutting off its nose to spite its face, and consequently limiting the returns of beneficiaries.

Whereas the last few years has seen overseas exchanges riding a tide of tech driven success, the London Stock Exchange is in decline, and with its mining, financial, manufacturing and retail bias it is in danger of being stuck in time. Dropping the ball with dual-class shares is a microcosm of the lack of ambition that is required to bring the London Stock Exchange back to relevance. It is time for broad minds and big ideas.

Bobby Reddy is an assistant professor at the University of Cambridge and a former partner at Latham & Watkins. He is the author of Founders without Limits: Dual-Class Stock and the Premium Tier of the London Stock Exchange.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • The campaign for dual-class listings in London
    November 18, 2019
    Stock market listings

    Stock exchanges want dual-class listings, and so do big tech companies. But not all experts are convinced of the benefits.

  • Dual-class shares: “Solutions exist to mitigate the governance risk”
    February 4, 2021
    Trading screen showing share prices

    Academic says existing governance measures could offset the risks of boosting the voting rights of some share owners over others.

  • US investors look to end dual-class shares
    January 31, 2017

    World's largest investors seek to end use of dual-class shares.

  • Dual-class shares come a step closer in the UK as Lord Hill issues review
    March 4, 2021
    Stock market board

    The report recommends pushing ahead with dual-class shares on the London Stock Exchange, with a consultation on the proposals to follow.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Bobby Reddy, dual-class share structure, dual-class shares, listing rules, London Stock Exchange, tech companies

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Twitter drops due diligence bombshell
  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
  • Ben & Jerry’s governance tested in court
  • Are cyber disclosure demands too high?
  • The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|