Skip to content

11 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

A remixed roadmap for the future of board leadership

by Barry Gamble on October 18, 2021

A recent report identifies the need for a new governance model that reflects the changing responsibilities of boards and their leaders.

Team climbing a mountain using collaborative leadership

Image: Ilyafs/Shutterstock

Board directors might be forgiven for feeling somewhat overwhelmed by the constant flow of reports, directives, rules, regulation, checklists and best practice guidance offered up in the name of improving corporate governance. Authored, amongst others, by institutional shareholders, proxy advisers, lawyers, accountants, brokers, headhunters and regulators these may be seen as an unrelenting torrent.

So another weighty tome from the, US-centric, National Association of Corporate Directors—adding to over 20 other reports in its Blue Ribbon Commission series—might be seen as one report too many. That just could be a mistake, since this report Fit for the future: an urgent imperative for board leadership is refreshing in its approach, the thinking frames offered and the ideas it stimulates.

Against a backcloth of demographic and workplace changes (now exacerbated by Covid-19), disruptions to industries and business models, social media and investor activism, transparency, climate change, geopolitical instability and the advance of digital technology, the report identifies the need for for a new governance model for leading boards into the future.

In reality, the report is less a new governance model but more a useful remix of existing approaches made different by the priorities and emphasis. It calls for boards characterised by faster decision-making, proactive behaviours, adaptability and innovation.

It tries to summarise the quality required to lead boards into the future with just one word, fortitude. It observes that this word is “not often used in modern business parlance” but offers meaning by describing this as being a mixture of courage, strength of mind and character, boldness, perseverance and resilience. It then pointedly notes that many board leaders know what they should do to improve their boards, but lack the courage to champion and achieve change.

The report seeks to use words to shift our mindsets. Rather than focus on the common tags of chair, chairwoman, chairman, chairperson or indeed non-executive, it majors on the use of board leader to describe the person running the board and their role as being board leadership.

Building better boards

The imperative for board leadership has five “implications”, starting with engagement. It implores board leaders to drive continuous improvement through more and better quality board engagement. Although it reminds us that boards provide oversight and direction, not day-to-day management, it emphasises the need for boards to have better access to information. This, it argues, should include information sourced independently of management.

Just as many boards will likely have experienced through the pandemic, it sees a shifting balance between the roles of the executive and other board directors. While in oversight terms it emphasises the imperative for the board to “put guardrails on management’s ambitions”, it also sees a role for the board to provide encouragement to the executive to be bold and embrace change.

The board leader needs to be like the conductor of an orchestra, setting the rhythm and tone of discussions

It falls to the board leader to drive this heightened, more continuous degree of engagement, to ensure more intense discussions, the right conversations are being conducted at the right time, the board is well informed, critical relationships maintained and boundaries respected. The board leader needs to be like the conductor of an orchestra, setting the rhythm and tone of discussions and ensuring each member plays their part to best effect.

The second implication is board renewal by maintaining a constant focus on the mix of expertise from board members, tapping diversity in all its forms and ensuring the renewal of the board aligns with the evolving strategy and risk profile. It sees the board leader as catalysing and orchestrating a transformation in how a board is composed and structured, its operation and accountability.

This leads to the third implication of a board operating model and a structure which is dynamic. This starts with board agendas which do not allocated disproportionate time to procedural and compliance matters. But at the same time recognising that meetings are just the tip of the iceberg in the board process. Board leaders must, through effective time management, within and without formal meetings. They must maintain focus on what really matters through discussions which truly challenge the thinking of management teams whose strategies may have become stuck in the past.

This is a much more hands-on approach than many board directors would be used to. The authors identified than half the boards they surveyed reported the need for better quality, rather than quantity of board information. Addressing this is an imperative to underpinning the dynamic board operating model.

Board visibility and accountability

This idea links with the fourth implication of board transparency. The authors argue that the image of an aloof and ill-informed board is dangerous. Boards should behave as if anything they say and do may become public. The board leader needs to challenge assumptions on the application of board confidentiality, about the limits of transparency and disclosure. In the view of the authors, directors need to work out how to offer visibility into the workings of the board including relationships with all stakeholders.

The last implication is accountability for individual director and board performance arguing this needs much more attention and noting that in the view of many the whole activist industry exists because public boards are often seen as inadequately equipped to meet shareholder needs.

Directors should be encouraged to speak candidly, disagree vigorously and still achieve a workable consensus

This starts with the rigour and candour of discussions, it identifies that more debate and the expression of diverging views make for better decisions. Directors should be encouraged to speak candidly, disagree vigorously and still achieve a workable consensus.

From these five implications it identifies various strategies for board leaders. This list is long and includes forward-thinking, agility, flexibility and self-correction. The real emphasis is on fortitude and adaptability, communication skills, relationship building, unconventional thinking, humility and placing a premium on listening skills. The board leader should be a conductor ensuring more intense engagement taking place in a harmonious way where everyone is respectful of each other’s role and view.

It encourages boards to trust management teams but to always verify information provided. Boards should have the confidence to ask tough questions and drill deeper, it argues. The authors see an increasing role for real-time objective information being available to the board.

The authors encourage all boards to step back then apply a clean-sheet approach to board composition and the skill set need. This should be supplemented by refreshing the board experience through repeat training and induction for all directors; an emphasis on continuous learning.

If you can avoid becoming lost in some of the detailed recitals this report is a useful template for board leaders. In the words of the report, the future belongs to businesses that grasp the scale and scope of change, and adapt.

Barry Gamble is chair of the NED City Debates and adviser to the Non-Executive Directors Association.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Directors' social networks reduce risk of corporate failure
    May 4, 2022

    Study says failure is less likely when a board’s “social network” is large, its managerial network small and its executive pay relatively low.

  • ACGA urges overhaul of Hong Kong corporate governance
    June 28, 2021
    Hong Kong skyline

    Asian Corporate Governance Association criticises Hong Kong's "soft-touch approach" and calls for gender quotas and fixed terms for non-execs.

  • Are UK corporate governance rules leading to market malaise?
    January 14, 2022
    Share listings board

    A recent article argued the UK needs "more directors who understand risk-taking, not virtue signalling" if London is to regain its status.

  • Governance must not stand in the way of innovation
    October 27, 2022
    governance and innovation

    As regulation increases, innovation suffers—but a diverse, savvy board can promote a corporate culture open to change.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap