Skip to content

12 August, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      PwC fined for BT audit; greenwashing sanctions; cost of living crisis; $300m pay deal; US...

    • Twitter Elon Musk Twitter drops due diligence bombshell

      The high-profile lawsuit brought by Twitter against Elon Musk raises an issue close to all...

    • short selling investors How to beat short selling activism

      What would you do if your company was targeted by short-selling activist investors? Communication is...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • short selling investors

      How to beat short selling activism

      What would you do if your company was targeted by short-selling activist investors? Communication is...

    • ESG debate

      The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

      The issues boards face are rarely straightforward, and ESG is no exception. It is time...

    • AI

      How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

      An ISO standard issued this year gives guidance to boards on the governance implications of...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • global warming

      ESG is not a ‘distraction’

      We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society...

    • Man with magnifying glass The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

      Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the...

    • notebook on boardroom table The UK needs a code of conduct for company directors

      A formal code of conduct for company directors would signal their willingness to apply high...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      PwC fined for BT audit; greenwashing sanctions; cost of living crisis; $300m pay deal; US...

    • US boards diversity US boards slow diversity with poor retirement policies

      Only 6% of organisations have term limits for directors, and there is reluctance around mandatory...

    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Tory leadership contest; Grant Thornton fined; Norwegian insider dealing; virtual AGMs; US environmental disclosures; diversity...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

Calls grow for tougher rules on human rights in supply chains

by Gavin Hinks on July 7, 2021

The Corporate Justice Coalition says the UK cannot be viewed as a leader on human rights based upon the current Modern Slavery Act.

Hands in chains

Image: Valery Sidelnykov/Shutterstock.com

There is now major pressure for the UK to update its laws governing the way companies approach the risk of human rights abuses in their supply chains.

Some form of action looks almost certain. Campaign groups, including NGOs, and businesses, demand it, legislators are pressing for it and government ministers have even pledged some minimal change. The only uncertainties seem to be the timing and degree. Business leaders should keep watch.

Much of the current activity is driven not just by the scandal last year surrounding UK clothing retailer Boohoo and factory conditions in the Midlands, but also the trade relationship with China and the treatment of Uyghur people as forced labour in the Xinjiang province of China. But it is also concerned with the UK’s current way of addressing supply chain issues through the Modern Slavery Act. Slavery, campaigners point out, though appalling, is only one aspect of human rights.

The latest instalment comes in a campaign launched this week by a group of 30 organisations under the umbrella Corporate Justice Coalition (CJC) calling for new laws to hold companies to account for human rights abuses in supply chains. The CJC insists the existing Modern Slavery Act has failed.

While the act demands transparency through an annual report on what companies have done to assure themselves supply chains contains are free of human rights breaches , the CJC says UK law must now go further than transparency. It wants companies to have an obligation to act and report on measures taken, as well as liability for companies and, potentially, directors.

That would bring the UK into line with the French “duty of vigilance” law and the Swiss Responsible Business Initiative. There are similar pieces of law in Germany and Norway while the European Union is working on new laws expected to be tabled in the autumn. The EU pushing ahead with its own law has fuelled activity at Westminster as campaigners make a “level playing field” argument: those trading with the EU will have to comply; those trading elsewhere will not.

Not ‘if’ but ‘when’

According to Mark Dearn, director of the CJC, the UK cannot be viewed as a leader on business and human rights based upon the Modern Slavery Act as it currently stands. The act, he argues, fails to guarantee supply chains are free of human rights abuses. He’s also upbeat: consumers do not want their goods and services “tainted”.

“Human rights due diligence is the new status quo; it’s not a question of ‘if’ it’s coming but ‘when’.” He adds: “To be a responsible business why wait for something coming down the track when you should be doing this anyway?”

The CJC’s position is buoyed by at least one business, fashion retailer Asos, saying that it wants to see mandatory human rights due diligence introduced in the UK.

The government has indicated it is listening to some arguments. In January foreign secretary Dominic Raab said the government would push ahead with measures including a review of export controls so they are sensitive to human rights transgressions in Xinjiang and financial penalties for “organisations” that fail to comply with current terms of the slavery act. There will also be more guidance for companies setting out the risk of trading in Xinjiang.

UK Modern Slavery Act ‘is out of date’

In March, however, the House of Commons business committee published a report calling for more stringent action on the Uyghur crisis and supply chain due diligence. The report declared: “The Modern Slavery Act is out of date, has no teeth and we do not accept that business should be excused from doing basic due diligence to guarantee that their supply chains are fully transparent and free from forced labour and slavery.”

The committee sought a review of legislation to see if breaches of the slavery act could be the basis “for future disqualification” of directors and companies from registration.

It also urged the government to get on with its reforms and consider strengthening the transparency rules as well as creating a “digital depository” on the government’s website of modern slavery statements.

The government has largely ignored the committee report, especially its call for a timetable to reform legislation. A subsequent letter addressed to a business minister from committee chair Darren Jones, and member Nusrat Ghani, expresses outrage. It makes the painful point that UK companies currently face greater sanction for filing their accounts late than breaching modern slavery reporting rules.

“Sadly, the government’s response simply reinforces our report’s view that there is a lack of coherence and urgency in government in dealing with modern slavery, especially in Xinjiang,” the letter says.

Proposed amendments

Elsewhere there are efforts under way to go further. In the House of Lords a private members bill has been launched that would amend the Modern Slavery Act to make it an “offence” if information in slavery statements is “false or incomplete in a material particular,” and the person in charge “either knows it or is reckless as to whether it is”. The amendment also seeks to make company directors and partners directly “responsible” for slavery statements.

The government faces competing demands. It must balance the need to address human rights in supply chain with a desire to foster a trading relationship with China post Brexit. At the same time the EU is set to harden its stance with new laws and, as a result, create an imbalance between UK companies trading inside the union and those doing business elsewhere.

That’s a conflict ministers will be under pressure to resolve and most of the world is only heading in one direction: tougher supply chain due diligence. Pressure is building and the government has some work to do. Boards must be alert for some form of change in the not-too-distant future.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • UN calls for 'culture change' to improve human rights in supply chains
    December 3, 2021
    Factory in Delhi making clothes for western companies

    Push for due diligence comes as part of a roadmap aiming to embed use of the UN’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

  • Is human rights risk monitoring a weak link in your supply chain?
    August 10, 2020
    Weak link breaking a chain

    Current risk monitoring systems may not protect workers or provide an accurate assessment of risks. Here are the questions companies should ask themselves.

  • Investors call for mandatory human rights due diligence
    April 24, 2020
    human trafficking, hands tied with rope

    Some of world’s biggest asset managers, including Aviva, Federated Hermes and Robeco, have signed up to the Investor Alliance for Human Rights.

  • Japan to include human rights reference in its corporate governance code
    May 6, 2021
    Tokyo skyline at night

    Reports in the Japanese press indicate “respect for human rights” will be linked with inspecting supply chains for abuses in the revised code.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

China, corporate governance, Corporate Justice Coalition, ethics, human rights due diligence, supply chains, UK Modern Slavery Act

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Twitter drops due diligence bombshell
  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
  • Ben & Jerry’s governance tested in court
  • Virtual AGMs fall out of favour
  • The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|