Skip to content

3 December, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • FCA rules

      News round-up: this week in governance

      New FCA rules on ESG claims; psychologically safe board communications; IT and governance; how workers...

    • Proxy adviser warns LSE Proxy adviser warns LSE over governance

      Abolishing the public register of shareholder revolts ‘won’t stop capital providers exercising their democratic rights’,...

    • sustainability governance Sustainability governance is on the rise

      But despite greater corporate attention being paid to ESG, directors’ engagement with it is losing...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • purpose statement

      On purpose: crafting an authentic statement

      Purpose statements define how organisations align purpose and people. Here’s how to make a statement...

    • first-time CFO

      How to succeed as a first-time CFO

      The remit and responsibilities of the chief financial officer have changed, which can seem daunting...

    • ethical culture

      How to embed an ethical culture

      Business success depends on purpose—and therefore ethics—being the top item on any organisation’s board agenda.

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uk corporate governance

      Why UK corporate governance needs tightening up

      The LSE’s response to the government’s panicky U-turn on governance regulation is not helpful to...

    • faith in the UK Audit reform is essential to restore faith in the UK

      When it comes to understanding what attracts investors to a capital market, the London Stock...

    • U-turn on audit reform An uncomfortable U-turn on audit reform

      The government’s bonfire of the regulations expected for audit reform creates a source of uncertainty...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • reporting elements Boards urged to retain ‘beneficial’ reporting elements

      Although the government cancelled the requirement, resilience disclosures ‘cannot be wasted effort’, says senior auditco...

    • energy transition Collaboration is key to UK energy transition

      Communication, innovation and engagement are needed for the move to net zero, an expert panel...

    • helle bank jorgensen Helle Bank Jørgensen on governance, ESG and how board directors can become stewards of the future

      In spite of ESG toxicity in the US, she remains optimistic that companies are working...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • gender diversity study Academics criticise BlackRock gender diversity research

      Its methodology came under fire, with some critics also pointing out it was wrong to...

    • diversity of thought How to boost diversity of thought

      Companies benefit from diverse workforces, but also from having the input of different opinions and...

    • minority NED Number of minority NEDs drops

      Although there is some progress in diversity in other board roles, research suggests that boards...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Risk Map: Top Risks 2024

      Control Risks' Top Risks for 2024 cut across the geopolitical, security, operational, regulatory, and cyber/digital...

    • A Director’s Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations 2023

      An internal investigation must be handled meticulously to avoid legal exposure, regulatory or criminal prosecution...

    • Spencer Stuart UK Board Index Highlights 2023 cover

      Spencer Stuart UK Board Index Highlights 2023

      The 2023 UK Spencer Stuart Board Index is a review of board composition and governance...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Calls grow for tougher rules on human rights in supply chains

by Gavin Hinks on July 7, 2021

The Corporate Justice Coalition says the UK cannot be viewed as a leader on human rights based upon the current Modern Slavery Act.

Hands in chains

Image: Valery Sidelnykov/Shutterstock.com

There is now major pressure for the UK to update its laws governing the way companies approach the risk of human rights abuses in their supply chains.

Some form of action looks almost certain. Campaign groups, including NGOs, and businesses, demand it, legislators are pressing for it and government ministers have even pledged some minimal change. The only uncertainties seem to be the timing and degree. Business leaders should keep watch.

Much of the current activity is driven not just by the scandal last year surrounding UK clothing retailer Boohoo and factory conditions in the Midlands, but also the trade relationship with China and the treatment of Uyghur people as forced labour in the Xinjiang province of China. But it is also concerned with the UK’s current way of addressing supply chain issues through the Modern Slavery Act. Slavery, campaigners point out, though appalling, is only one aspect of human rights.

The latest instalment comes in a campaign launched this week by a group of 30 organisations under the umbrella Corporate Justice Coalition (CJC) calling for new laws to hold companies to account for human rights abuses in supply chains. The CJC insists the existing Modern Slavery Act has failed.

While the act demands transparency through an annual report on what companies have done to assure themselves supply chains contains are free of human rights breaches , the CJC says UK law must now go further than transparency. It wants companies to have an obligation to act and report on measures taken, as well as liability for companies and, potentially, directors.

That would bring the UK into line with the French “duty of vigilance” law and the Swiss Responsible Business Initiative. There are similar pieces of law in Germany and Norway while the European Union is working on new laws expected to be tabled in the autumn. The EU pushing ahead with its own law has fuelled activity at Westminster as campaigners make a “level playing field” argument: those trading with the EU will have to comply; those trading elsewhere will not.

Not ‘if’ but ‘when’

According to Mark Dearn, director of the CJC, the UK cannot be viewed as a leader on business and human rights based upon the Modern Slavery Act as it currently stands. The act, he argues, fails to guarantee supply chains are free of human rights abuses. He’s also upbeat: consumers do not want their goods and services “tainted”.

“Human rights due diligence is the new status quo; it’s not a question of ‘if’ it’s coming but ‘when’.” He adds: “To be a responsible business why wait for something coming down the track when you should be doing this anyway?”

The CJC’s position is buoyed by at least one business, fashion retailer Asos, saying that it wants to see mandatory human rights due diligence introduced in the UK.

The government has indicated it is listening to some arguments. In January foreign secretary Dominic Raab said the government would push ahead with measures including a review of export controls so they are sensitive to human rights transgressions in Xinjiang and financial penalties for “organisations” that fail to comply with current terms of the slavery act. There will also be more guidance for companies setting out the risk of trading in Xinjiang.

UK Modern Slavery Act ‘is out of date’

In March, however, the House of Commons business committee published a report calling for more stringent action on the Uyghur crisis and supply chain due diligence. The report declared: “The Modern Slavery Act is out of date, has no teeth and we do not accept that business should be excused from doing basic due diligence to guarantee that their supply chains are fully transparent and free from forced labour and slavery.”

The committee sought a review of legislation to see if breaches of the slavery act could be the basis “for future disqualification” of directors and companies from registration.

It also urged the government to get on with its reforms and consider strengthening the transparency rules as well as creating a “digital depository” on the government’s website of modern slavery statements.

The government has largely ignored the committee report, especially its call for a timetable to reform legislation. A subsequent letter addressed to a business minister from committee chair Darren Jones, and member Nusrat Ghani, expresses outrage. It makes the painful point that UK companies currently face greater sanction for filing their accounts late than breaching modern slavery reporting rules.

“Sadly, the government’s response simply reinforces our report’s view that there is a lack of coherence and urgency in government in dealing with modern slavery, especially in Xinjiang,” the letter says.

Proposed amendments

Elsewhere there are efforts under way to go further. In the House of Lords a private members bill has been launched that would amend the Modern Slavery Act to make it an “offence” if information in slavery statements is “false or incomplete in a material particular,” and the person in charge “either knows it or is reckless as to whether it is”. The amendment also seeks to make company directors and partners directly “responsible” for slavery statements.

The government faces competing demands. It must balance the need to address human rights in supply chain with a desire to foster a trading relationship with China post Brexit. At the same time the EU is set to harden its stance with new laws and, as a result, create an imbalance between UK companies trading inside the union and those doing business elsewhere.

That’s a conflict ministers will be under pressure to resolve and most of the world is only heading in one direction: tougher supply chain due diligence. Pressure is building and the government has some work to do. Boards must be alert for some form of change in the not-too-distant future.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • EU publishes proposals for human rights due diligence law
    February 24, 2022
    EU flag

    The proposals require company directors to take into account human rights, climate change and sustainability in their decision-making.

  • World Economic Forum issues business guidance on human rights
    May 24, 2022
    World Economic Forum logo

    Launched this week at Davos, the WEF report contains five questions for boards to consider regarding their conduct towards stakeholders.

  • UN calls for 'culture change' to improve human rights in supply chains
    December 3, 2021
    Factory in Delhi making clothes for western companies

    Push for due diligence comes as part of a roadmap aiming to embed use of the UN’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

  • Top UK companies push for mandatory human rights due diligence
    October 22, 2021
    Houses of Parliament

    Tesco, John Lewis, Asos and the Co-op are among the firms calling for new UK laws mandating human rights and environmental due diligence.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

China, corporate governance, Corporate Justice Coalition, ethics, human rights due diligence, supply chains, UK Modern Slavery Act

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us





Most Popular

  • Why UK corporate governance needs tightening up
  • Sustainability governance is on the rise
  • Proxy adviser warns LSE over governance
  • How to succeed as a first-time CFO
  • How to embed an ethical culture

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations 2023

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|

Copyright © 2023 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap