Skip to content

9 August, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ben & jerry's governance

      Ben & Jerry’s governance tested in court

      Unilever, owner of the ice cream brand, is in conflict with the governance legacy put...

    • carillion fine News round-up: this week in governance

      Audit firms' complaints about fines; Carillion directors' fines revealed; is it time to abolish the...

    • cyber security Cyber security reporting falls short

      UK companies are struggling to provide focused disclosures as cyber attacks continue to increase, says...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • ESG debate

      The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

      The issues boards face are rarely straightforward, and ESG is no exception. It is time...

    • AI

      How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

      An ISO standard issued this year gives guidance to boards on the governance implications of...

    • hybrid working

      Has hybridity killed teamwork?

      The time has come to check whether the benefits of teamwork are still outweighing the...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • global warming

      ESG is not a ‘distraction’

      We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society...

    • Man with magnifying glass The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

      Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the...

    • notebook on boardroom table The UK needs a code of conduct for company directors

      A formal code of conduct for company directors would signal their willingness to apply high...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Tory leadership contest; Grant Thornton fined; Norwegian insider dealing; virtual AGMs; US environmental disclosures; diversity...

    • A group of diverse job candidates Diversity business case arguments may deter job candidates

      Performance-based and fairness-based arguments confirm that social identities "are a lens through which contributions will...

    • Directors waiting for an interview Gender diversity warning for FTSE All-Share Index

      Report from Women on Boards and Protiviti reveals half of FTSE All Share companies outside...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

Executive remuneration models ‘do not describe how pay is actually set’

by Gavin Hinks on July 1, 2021

Researchers have interviewed non-executive directors and investors to highlight the hidden factors involved in CEO pay decisions.

CEO looking at his tablet

Image: Marvent/Shutterstock

New research suggests there is more going on under the surface of chief executive pay deals than is commonly understood. One of the most significant findings is that CEOs are less concerned by the overall size of their pay package than whether they receive a fair reward that supports their reputation.

Other revelantions are that non-executives appear to prioritise finding the right leader over “designing” a motivational remuneration deal while pay levels are driven mostly by the perception of a chief executive’s abilities. Meanwhile, investors overwhelmingly believe CEOs make better decisions if incentives are more long term.

The results come from a survey undertaken last year by Alex Edmans and Tom Gosling from London Business School, and Dirk Jenter of the London School of Economics. By questioning 203 non-executive directors from the FTSE All Share, and 159 UK equity investors, the trio hoped to uncover the real objectives and constraints on pay deals and to shine a light on the “determinants” of pay by looking at factors other studies have overlooked.

“Our results show that many standard assumptions of executive pay models do not describe how pay is actually set,” they conclude.

Motivations and incentives

Objectives differ in the minds of non-executives and investors. A hefty 65% of directors say they work to attract the right leader while 34% say it’s all about creating a deal that motivates a CEO. It’s the other way round for investors: 44% say it’s about finding a star, 51% say it’s about motivation.

Strangely when it comes to the long-running debate about CEO pay level only 1% of directors and 5% of investors say the primary goal is to keep pay down.

Non-executives, however, do feel under pressure. 67% say they would “sacrifice” shareholder value to sidestep controversy over CEO pay because of pressure from proxy advisers, workers and customers.

A whopping 77% of non-executives say shareholder “guidelines” have forced them to lower pay. But when they were asked about the outcome 42% say it produced “no adverse” effect, though 42% declared that their CEOs were less motivated.

When it comes to financial incentives both non-executives and investors agree they are important, but less so than another factor. “The CEO’s intrinsic motivation and personal reputation are seen as most important,” the academics write, “yet are absent from nearly all [pay] theories.”

Survey respondents told the researchers finances only “reinforce” intrinsic and  “reputational” incentives. Variable pay plays an important role in underpinning these reputation concerns. “Our respondents … suggest that variable pay provides ex-post recognition. A CEO doesn’t not need the extra pay to finance consumption but believes it is fair to be recognised for a job well done.”

CEO ability and performance

And then there are pay levels: the key determining factor, the research finds,  is CEO ability. And while pay increases are driven by performance, there are rarely any “decreases” for CEOs.

“Several interviewees explained that pay cuts would demotivate the CEO and, if performance were poor enough to warrant a cut, they would fire her instead.”

After assessing all their survey findings the researcher conclude: “Investors and especially directors believe that CEOs evaluate their compensation relative to a set of reference points,” write the researchers, “such as the pay of other CEOs, their past pay and their perceived contribution to the firm.

“In turn, directors and investors evaluate CEO pay relative to a set of potentially difference reference points, such as the pay go other CEOs, past CEO pay, the pay of employees and other top executives and shareholder returns.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Greencore faces executive pay opposition
    January 24, 2017

    Proxy voting service recommends voting against food group's executive pay package.

  • Caution urged over UK executive pay
    October 10, 2016

    PwC pay expert calls for an "escalation mechanism" rather than immediate use of binding votes for shareholders concerned about pay.

  • SEC reveals executive pay guidance
    October 25, 2016
    SEC seal

    Watchdog produces advice on how to calculate executive pay ratios.

  • Executive pay regulation to tighten
    November 30, 2016

    UK government proposes new powers for shareholders over executive pay, as well the publication of executive pay ratios.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

CEO pay, CEO remuneration, corporate governance, Executive pay, investors, non-executive directors, research, strategy

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
  • Virtual AGMs fall out of favour
  • Cyber security reporting falls short
  • How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
  • Consumers judge a company by its ‘morality’

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|