Skip to content

29 March, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • net zero plans

      Investors seek commitment to net zero planning

      Climate change campaigning investors have written to 107 companies, asking for prompt proof of net...

    • Mars ESG News round-up: this week in governance

      Mars CEO defends ESG and purpose; US president vetoes anti-ESG bill; trust can negatively affect...

    • ChatGPT technology Could ChatGPT technology join the board?

      Although governance may stop artificial intelligence replacing anyone on the board today, AI may soon...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • non-compete clause

      When employees become the competition

      How might you be affected by a global move towards the banning of employment contract...

    • data decision

      How to boost decision making

      Innovative digital tools can help boards to deliver against strategic objectives, but it is the...

    • remote working

      Navigating the new world of work

      Firms need to focus on building an inclusive environment and a culture of trust to...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uncertainty in 2023

      Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty

      Agility, planning in the shorter term and bravery will all stand chief executives in good...

    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • female ceo Less than a third of FTSE 100 executives are women

      In Europe as a whole, only 7.7% of top companies’ chief executives are female, gender...

    • board size Performance declines as boards grow in size

      Researchers found that investment dropped by 2-3 percentage points as companies passed from 12 to...

    • Silicon Valley governance Silicon Valley improves its governance

      Big technology companies are stealing a march over other top corporates when it comes to...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Diligent report

      Forrester: The Total Economic Impact Of Diligent Board & Leadership Collaboration

      Diligent Board Leadership & Collaboration reduced the risk of confidential material loss, supported decision-making, and...

    • Gender diversity barometer

      Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe

      The 2023 Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe looks at the 16...

    • geopolitical risk airmic

      Navigating geopolitical risk

      Today, the future feels less secure, and optimism is more restrained. Taking decisions in an...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Bonuses and bias: the risks of variable pay for compliance professionals

by Jonathan Bowdler

When a compliance professional perceives their pay package may be reduced as a result of their actions, there is a risk of biased decisions.

Cogs and wheels of compliance, rules, policies

Image: EtiAmmos/Shutterstock

For many organisations, recent developments mean an accountable person responsible for compliance needs to be a board director. For some firms this might be the CEO, a legal director or a dedicated compliance director.

The individual accountable for compliance needs to feel safe to speak their mind and always be trusted to do this. The board must take on the recommendations presented by the head of compliance but also be in a position to make up their own minds in order to navigate a correct course of action.

There is however a balance: most organisations exist to meet strategic commercial objectives and not solely to be compliant. It is the responsibility of the head of compliance to help build a successful business while being compliant at the same time.

Managing compliance risk

In the past, compliance professionals were often viewed as “business prevention”; however, this view is no longer considered appropriate. Those that head up the compliance function now need to adopt an empathetic attitude where they step into the shoes of colleagues and understand their commercial objectives while ensuring that no unacceptable compliance risks are being taken.

When a compliance officer perceives their variable pay may be reduced by their actions, there is a risk that biased decisions will be made

This is a positive shift, and it should be recognised that no firm can ever be 100% compliant all of the time, so compliance officers are looking to achieve and manage an acceptable level of compliance risk. This relates to the level of seriousness of issues and their impact. There should be no serious breaches and controls should be in place to swiftly identify and prevent rapid escalation of any minor breaches.

It is actually dangerous to believe that a firm can take a zero tolerance to compliance risk, but they can have a zero tolerance to material breaches. Regulators understand this too. It’s a pragmatic and realistic approach.

For example, HSBC came under scrutiny between 2011 and 2018 for excessive de-risking due to being under a deferred prosecution agreement with US regulators. Too much caution could have been deemed potentially damaging to the organisation and its customers’ interests.

So, what does this mean for the pay package of compliance professionals? When a compliance officer perceives their variable pay may be reduced by their actions, there is a risk that biased decisions will be made. This is more to do with the influence of the respective bonus and less to do with the integrity of compliance professional. However, the unconscious bias of variable remuneration should not be ignored.

The fact is that conflicts of interest arise all the time. So, should we aim to remove them completely or manage them?

Controls for compliance and variable pay

Firstly, there needs to be an understanding that any variable financial bonus can influence behaviour, for both good and bad. The main challenges lie in rewarding individuals for meeting short-term targets. If there is pressure or a benefit for the business and the individual to meet say a quarterly target, it can influence decision-making and increase risk.

We can’t just remove bonuses entirely as the link to commercial success will be lost and the organisation as a whole and its clients may suffer commercially

One example was a company where the board decided to sell-off a subsidiary to rationalise costs and meet quarterly financial targets. The executive directors were in a difficult, pressurised situation where failure to end up in the black could have resulted in the loss of their own jobs. They should have challenged their own decision. The non-executive directors and the head of compliance should also have spoken up. However, really this situation, is an example of where the system of remuneration and controls failed and needed to be addressed as it drove the poor behaviour.

Limiting short-termism and removing incentives is one option for a pay strategy, but we can’t just remove bonuses entirely as the link to commercial success will be lost and the organisation as a whole and its clients may suffer commercially. Compliance professionals will not be able to empathise and co-operate as efficiently with colleagues with different objectives if they are not commercially focused too. Therefore, how variable pay is structured to influence behaviour in a desired way is important and this needs to have a long-term view.

A remuneration package could be designed to include a deferred share option, such as the kind often awarded to company directors, but on a smaller scale. This will encourage the head of compliance to accept an appropriate level of commercial risk and work with colleagues to achieve long-term commercial goals but be comfortable enough to intervene to prevent excessively risky behaviour in the short term.

Even if the head of compliance can be remunerated successfully, he or she will be powerless if the rest of the senior management and board members are not. If everyone comes from a different perspective, all with their own agenda and one eye on their bonus, it simply won’t work. The answer lies in linking variable remuneration to long-term company success; not just for those responsible for compliance but the whole senior management team members of the board alike.

In this way staff are rewarded for commercial acumen while the company remains compliant.

Jonathan Bowdler is head of governance risk and compliance at the International Compliance Association.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Predictable pay-outs expose the charade of performance-related pay
    November 16, 2021
    CEOs chasing money

    Incentive plans, share awards and bonus payments have become almost a guaranteed part of a chief executive’s pay package.

  • Executive pay, sustainability KPIs and the climate crisis
    December 1, 2021
    CSO with green tie and leaf in his top pocket

    Linking KPIs to sustainability targets results in complexity. A focus on corporate purpose is a better way to tackle climate change.

  • A remixed roadmap for the future of board leadership
    October 18, 2021
    Team climbing a mountain using collaborative leadership

    A recent report identifies the need for a new governance model that reflects the changing responsibilities of boards and their leaders.

  • Battle of the boards: risk, ESG and two-tier board structures
    April 22, 2022
    Board risk meeting

    There is an inherent conflict of interest between main and executive boards, with two different time horizons and two different risk impacts.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

compliance, Compliance management, corporate governance, Executive bonuses, International Compliance Association, Jonathan Bowdler, pay, Remuneration, strategy

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Could ChatGPT technology join the board?
  • Larry Fink puts focus on finance and inflation
  • Call for FTSE 100 companies to give guidance on ethics
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • ESG resilience requires leaders to manage without certainty

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|