Skip to content

9 August, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ben & jerry's governance

      Ben & Jerry’s governance tested in court

      Unilever, owner of the ice cream brand, is in conflict with the governance legacy put...

    • carillion fine News round-up: this week in governance

      Audit firms' complaints about fines; Carillion directors' fines revealed; is it time to abolish the...

    • cyber security Cyber security reporting falls short

      UK companies are struggling to provide focused disclosures as cyber attacks continue to increase, says...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • ESG debate

      The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

      The issues boards face are rarely straightforward, and ESG is no exception. It is time...

    • AI

      How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

      An ISO standard issued this year gives guidance to boards on the governance implications of...

    • hybrid working

      Has hybridity killed teamwork?

      The time has come to check whether the benefits of teamwork are still outweighing the...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • global warming

      ESG is not a ‘distraction’

      We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society...

    • Man with magnifying glass The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

      Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the...

    • notebook on boardroom table The UK needs a code of conduct for company directors

      A formal code of conduct for company directors would signal their willingness to apply high...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Tory leadership contest; Grant Thornton fined; Norwegian insider dealing; virtual AGMs; US environmental disclosures; diversity...

    • A group of diverse job candidates Diversity business case arguments may deter job candidates

      Performance-based and fairness-based arguments confirm that social identities "are a lens through which contributions will...

    • Directors waiting for an interview Gender diversity warning for FTSE All-Share Index

      Report from Women on Boards and Protiviti reveals half of FTSE All Share companies outside...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

Big boss is watching: the pros and cons of employee surveillance

by Gavin Hinks

Some organisations are monitoring their employees as they work—or don’t work—from home. But there are pitfalls to this strategy.

Digital spy coming out of a laptop

Image: rogistok/Shutterstock

Remote working has become a norm in the pandemic, but concern has been growing that many workers tapping away at their laptops may also have a spy in their living rooms or bedrooms: their bosses.

As lockdown forced millions to set up office at home there has been increasing alarm about the software employers may be using to monitor their staff. Last week the worries reached new heights when the Labour Party called for revised rules to regulate digital surveillance. The party is concerned workers are monitored without their informed consent.

“Ministers must urgently provide better regulatory oversight of online surveillance software to ensure people have the right to privacy whether in their workplace or home—which are increasingly one and the same,” says Labour shadow digital minister Chi Onwurah.

Use of remote tracking software does appear to be a trend, but for a minority. A YouGov survey found 12% of employers chose to track workers and monitor their productivity when lockdowns were imposed. Another 10% say they have it under consideration. However, a hefty 45% say it isn’t on their radar. Yet.

It’s worth balancing those facts with other YouGov findings. A majority of managers, 60%, do not believe remote working has affected employee “compliance”; 67% say communications aren’t an issue with home workers; and almost half, 46%, say employee loyalty is stronger.

But there remains a small but determined number of companies seduced by software marketing and the functionality they been offered to invest in watching their staff.

A trust issue

Of course, employees have been monitored throughout the history of work, but this may be the first time it’s happened at scale in the home. Some software is painfully intrusive; other applications are not. Activity ranges from counting keystrokes on a typepad through to highly invasive use of computer cameras to take random photos of workers.

“[Monitoring] might have some technical pros in capturing a few bad apples, but will it spoil the orchard at the same time?”

—Chris Cowton, Institute for Business Ethics

But how should employers weigh up the pros and cons? Chris Cowton, associate director at the Institute for Business Ethics, says monitoring—when used in the right way—is a legitimate activity and certainly requires full disclosure from employers to employees. But, he says, it comes down to being a “trust” issue and suggests boards consider how monitoring aligns with their approach to managing staff.

“How does it fit with your stated values? How does it fit the principles written down in your code of ethics?” Cowton asks. “Will it undermine some strengths in your corporate culture? It might have some technical pros in capturing a few bad apples, but will it spoil the orchard at the same time?”

It’s also worth managers going through the mental exercise of considering how they would react if their monitoring activities were publicly reported, he says.

“Would you be happy to defend them? If your friends, or your mum or trusted spiritual adviser knew about these things, would you feel embarrassed?”

The benefits of employee surveillance

It’s not all down side. According to Cowton, digital surveillance may help monitor employee health, offer the insights that prompts a manager to ask a colleague to take a break. It might also help ensure fairness at work, that everyone is pulling their weight, not just a few. But there remain big questions to consider.

For Jonny Gifford, a senior adviser at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), employee surveillance, while a legitimate employer activity, needs to be “proportionate” if it is to be legal, and support “healthy work relationships”.

There is much agreement on that. Writing in the Harvard Business Review psychologist Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, and lawyer Richard Buchband, say clear communication about the use of monitoring and the reasons why can be consistent with a “transparent culture and a relationship of trust”.

CIPD has tracked where employee surveillance has gone wrong. In one example the European Court of Human Rights ruled that a worker’s right to a private life had been breached because the employer had recovered emails and messages from a work computer to prove the laptop had been used for personal reasons.

“Employers and managers should be asking: ‘How much do I need to know about what people are doing?’”

—Jonny Gifford, CIPD

For Gifford it is important to consider how employee surveillance has a bearing on workplace “autonomy”. “We know that autonomy is a key psychological resource”, he says.

“If you’ve got a pressing deadline, significant demand on your effort at work, but you’ve got autonomy, you’re more able to meet that work.”

This is especially important, he says, in an economy that relies on skilled, knowledgeable and highly motivated workers. “We know autonomy feeds that,” he adds.

According to Gifford, use of monitoring is perhaps bound up with companies (in the gig economy, for example) that remain attached to Taylorism—the system of “scientific management” developed by Fred Taylor in 1911 that breaks work into smaller tasks and requires a high degree of management and control. The method has been left behind by many companies with efforts to empower their workers.

Gifford says managers should be striking a “sensible balance”. Though he anticipates no outright ban, a tightening of regulations could be on the way.

Good management skills remain a key element alongside monitoring. Chamorro-Premuzic and Buchband write: “Now more than ever before, managers should understand not just the elements of good leadership, including inspiring, connecting and understanding their teams, but also the regulatory and moral implications of exercising it while virtually entering people’s homes”.”

Gifford says: “Employers and managers should be asking: ‘How much do I need to know about what people are doing?’” He adds: “Just because you can, doesn’t mean you should.”

Remote working looks like its here to stay for many employees. Figuring out new conventions and practices, and establishing confidence in this new form of management, may take time.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Crisis leadership and the role of the board
    June 18, 2020
    crisis management

    How boards deal with unexpected crises has been strongly tested in recent months. What does it take for leaders to be effective in the heat of a crisis?

  • Facebook’s fail: the 'story', the risks and the role of the board
    June 12, 2018
    Facebook, Cambridge Analytica, data harvesting, data ethics

    Cambridge Analytica harvested the data of 50 million Facebook users to help swing the US presidential election, but amid the trend for corporate governance 'narratives', did Facebook's directors forget the chapter on ethics?

  • Performance and accountability: the changing role of the chair
    March 27, 2019
    SIngle red chair in a white boardroom

    The role of the board chair has changed dramatically in the past decade, with chairs increasingly held responsible for corporate governance failures. How can board leaders ensure they are prepared for the challenges ahead?

  • The growth of impact investing and the role of boards
    March 6, 2019
    impact investing, social impact, money

    The market for impact investing is now worth around $1.3trn. It is an opportunity for boards to steer their companies towards work that returns social or environmental benefits.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

business ethics, CIPD, corporate culture, employee rights, employees, remote working, strategy, Technology

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
  • Virtual AGMs fall out of favour
  • Cyber security reporting falls short
  • How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
  • Consumers judge a company by its ‘morality’

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|