Imbalance of power: loyalty shares threaten ‘one share, one vote’
The rise of loyalty shares—conferring multiple voting rights—is disrupting the principle of fair and equal treatment of all shareholders in Europe and beyond.
Image: Optimarc/Shutterstock
One share, one vote. It’s a compelling premise for corporate governance, but it is being eroded by developments around the world, including in Europe. At LGIM, we are actively working to push back for equality.
If you bought one share in a company that had issued 100 shares, you would reasonably expect to control 1% of the voting rights in that company. If you bought more shares, you would also hope that your voting rights would increase correspondingly.
This, however, is increasingly not the case across Europe. One reason for this is the rise of so-called loyalty shares, which generally give their holders double or multiple voting ri
For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda
Related Stories
-
Dual-class shares: “Solutions exist to mitigate the governance risk”
Academic says existing governance measures could offset the risks of boosting the voting rights of some share owners over others.
-
UK to review dual-class shares as part of consultation on listings
Chancellor Rishi Sunak has included dual-class shares in a review of UK listings, with the ICGN warning that they risk lowering governance standards.
-
FRC chief indicates support for a UK version of Sarbanes-Oxley
Sir Jon Thompson says a UK regime similar to Sarbanes-Oxley would raise governance standards and improve risk management and accountability.
