Social media: when personal beliefs clash with corporate values
Recent cases of controversial social media posts have focused attention on what happens when employees’ beliefs or opinions contradict their employers’ values. It’s the responsibility of the board to lead an offline discussion with staff about the boundaries of their personal and professional personas.
Image: Julia Tim/Shutterstock
By its very nature, social media blurs our professional and private selves. When we put a disclaimer in our Twitter bio stating “Views my own, and do not reflect those of my employer”, we may feel that is sufficient.
Similarly, you often read “Retweets don’t imply endorsement or agreement”. Yet if you share the information, and if it is libellous or inaccurate, then you can be held accountable for its dissemination.
This was borne out by a recent case in Australia. Israel Folau, the professional rugby player who holds the record for the most scores tried in Super Rugby history, was sacked by Rugby Australia after he published
For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda
Related Stories
-
When doing good garners bad press
Firms that engage in corporate social outreach should make sure they send consistent signals, or they risk their actions being interpreted as a sign of bad conscience.
-
MPs call for extension of gender pay gap reporting
MPs criticise gender pay gap reporting and call for companies of 50 employees to be included in requirements.
-
Workforce voice in corporate governance: where are we now?
FRC research into implementation of requirements on workforce engagement shows that progress has been patchy.
