Skip to content

9 August, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ben & jerry's governance

      Ben & Jerry’s governance tested in court

      Unilever, owner of the ice cream brand, is in conflict with the governance legacy put...

    • carillion fine News round-up: this week in governance

      Audit firms' complaints about fines; Carillion directors' fines revealed; is it time to abolish the...

    • cyber security Cyber security reporting falls short

      UK companies are struggling to provide focused disclosures as cyber attacks continue to increase, says...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • ESG debate

      The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

      The issues boards face are rarely straightforward, and ESG is no exception. It is time...

    • AI

      How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

      An ISO standard issued this year gives guidance to boards on the governance implications of...

    • hybrid working

      Has hybridity killed teamwork?

      The time has come to check whether the benefits of teamwork are still outweighing the...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • global warming

      ESG is not a ‘distraction’

      We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society...

    • Man with magnifying glass The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

      Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the...

    • notebook on boardroom table The UK needs a code of conduct for company directors

      A formal code of conduct for company directors would signal their willingness to apply high...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Tory leadership contest; Grant Thornton fined; Norwegian insider dealing; virtual AGMs; US environmental disclosures; diversity...

    • A group of diverse job candidates Diversity business case arguments may deter job candidates

      Performance-based and fairness-based arguments confirm that social identities "are a lens through which contributions will...

    • Directors waiting for an interview Gender diversity warning for FTSE All-Share Index

      Report from Women on Boards and Protiviti reveals half of FTSE All Share companies outside...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

Companies set to swerve option of workers on boards

by Gavin Hinks on October 11, 2018

A survey reveals that despite being an option in the UK’s corporate governance code, workers on boards is an unpopular choice.

A light, airy boardroom with directors

Image: Shutterstock.com

In a speech launching her campaign to become Tory party leader Theresa May declared her earnest intention of placing worker representatives on company boards. The measure was all part of her plan to improve the way big business is run and embedded in a wider agenda to reform the economy for “greater shared prosperity”.

Two years on, workers on boards is just one of three options companies have been given in a new governance code. But news this week suggests it will prove highly unpopular.

One British governance expert told Board Agenda he was regularly “chastised” by continental colleagues for Britain’s lack of enthusiasm.

A poll by ICSA: The Governance Institute, a professional body for company secretaries, revealed that 70% of companies surveyed believe workers on boards are not a good idea. Little more than one in ten, 13%, said it was a sound proposition. A resounding 91% said they were not considering workers on their boards.

That said, just 29% of respondents said they had deliberated worker representation for boards. Of those that have, just 2% prefer a worker in their boardrooms.

Despite much discussion and debate, workers seem likely to take boardroom seats at very few UK companies. Peter Swabey, policy and research director at ICSA, said: “While there is an overall feeling that it is crucial that the board hears and takes note of the views of staff and other stakeholders, respondents believe that there are mechanisms other than a seat at the board table that will allow them to do so.”

The new UK Corporate Governance Code released in July offered companies three options: an employee on the board, a non-executive designated to represent workers’ views and opinions or a formal workforce advisory panel. ICSA finds that most companies are likely to opt for the latter two.

Lack of enthusiasm

But why? European companies appear to function well with worker representatives on their boards, even very large multinational organisations. Indeed, one British governance expert told Board Agenda he was regularly “chastised” by continental colleagues for Britain’s lack of enthusiasm.

When ICSA asked what the problems were, respondents cited a number, including a difficulty in finding one worker to represent a diverse workforce and many locations around the world; and directors’ duties in the UK mean that a board member must have wider responsibilities than the board. Others say that UK law already demands that directors take into account the interests of workers making a employee on the board redundant.

Jeremy Corbyn. Photo: Shutterstock
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said he will give employees one third of board seats, if elected.

For many these claims fail to convince. Luke Hildyard, director at the High Pay Centre, a campaign group, says the “multiple locations” claim misunderstands the purpose of boards—they are not convened so directors can represent special interest groups. The “wider responsibilities” argument can be countered by giving workers the same duties as other directors. And the idea that board members already act in the interest of workers is countered by public perception that they mostly don’t, whatever the law demands. “The issues are red herrings,” says Hildyard.

Worker directors are not without support elsewhere. The Trades Union Congress has advocated their introduction, while some investment managers have also argued the case for a worker in the boardroom. Indeed, in March this year Hans-Christoph Hirt, the head of Hermes EOS, wrote in a blog that, on balance, the policy works well and should be introduced to the UK.

However, according to some governance experts there is a risk in the code’s new provision. If companies fail to properly give employees a meaningful hearing, regardless of the code option they choose, it might result in pressure to legislate for further change. After all, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said he will give employees one third of board seats, if elected. Rightly or wrongly that is emphatic policy statement. The flexbility of the new code means that if few companies take up the workers-on-boards option it could prove embarrassing for the government after Theresa May’s talk of employee engagement, according to Hildyard. Indeed it could look like a deliberate attempt to help companies duck an uncomfortable policy.

Elsewhere, others caution that the spirit of the code should be heard. Roger Barker, head of corporate governance at the Institute of Directors, says if it is perceived that the code options are not providing a real voice to workers, it “could lead to a backlash and renewed impetus for reform.”

He adds: “It’s up to companies to make it work for them in a way that genuinely brings the worker’s voice to the boardroom.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • May dilutes pledge to get more workers on boards
    November 23, 2016

    UK prime minister Theresa May scales down her leadership pledge on employee representation in British boardrooms.

  • ICAEW calls for workers on boards
    December 5, 2016

    Accountancy body calls for prime minister to stick with the introduction of workers on boards.

  • Companies 'failing to demonstrate oversight of vulnerable workers'
    April 30, 2020
    worker in warehouse stacking boxes

    Research reveals a lack of data on vulnerable workers in supply chains, despite investor demands for better reporting and oversight.

  • There's still everything to gain from having workers on boards
    November 20, 2017
    boardroom, closed doors, employees on boards, worker representation

    Despite the government’s U-turn, there remains a good case for companies to bring employees into the boardroom, says Janet Williamson of the TUC.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

ICSA, Institute of Directors, The High Pay Centre, UK Corporate Governance Code, workers on boards

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
  • Virtual AGMs fall out of favour
  • Cyber security reporting falls short
  • How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
  • Consumers judge a company by its ‘morality’

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|