Skip to content

9 August, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • US boards diversity

      US boards slow diversity with poor retirement policies

      Only 6% of organisations have term limits for directors, and there is reluctance around mandatory...

    • ben & jerry's governance Ben & Jerry’s governance tested in court

      Unilever, owner of the ice cream brand, is in conflict with the governance legacy put...

    • carillion fine News round-up: this week in governance

      Audit firms' complaints about fines; Carillion directors' fines revealed; is it time to abolish the...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • ESG debate

      The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

      The issues boards face are rarely straightforward, and ESG is no exception. It is time...

    • AI

      How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

      An ISO standard issued this year gives guidance to boards on the governance implications of...

    • hybrid working

      Has hybridity killed teamwork?

      The time has come to check whether the benefits of teamwork are still outweighing the...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • global warming

      ESG is not a ‘distraction’

      We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society...

    • Man with magnifying glass The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

      Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the...

    • notebook on boardroom table The UK needs a code of conduct for company directors

      A formal code of conduct for company directors would signal their willingness to apply high...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • US boards diversity US boards slow diversity with poor retirement policies

      Only 6% of organisations have term limits for directors, and there is reluctance around mandatory...

    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Tory leadership contest; Grant Thornton fined; Norwegian insider dealing; virtual AGMs; US environmental disclosures; diversity...

    • A group of diverse job candidates Diversity business case arguments may deter job candidates

      Performance-based and fairness-based arguments confirm that social identities "are a lens through which contributions will...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

A new act in the performance of capitalism

by Gavin Hinks on October 1, 2018

US senator Elizabeth Warren has proposed reform that would mean sweeping changes to governance and capitalism in the US.

Elizabeth Warren

Elizabeth Warren. Photo: Shutterstock

It’s probable that Senator Elizabeth Warren, author of the proposed Accountable Capitalism Act, does not think of herself as a socialist. A Democrat, yes. But socialist? Unlikely.

However, Warren has been accused of launching a socialist policy after suggesting significant reforms to US corporate governance which seek to change the way companies are instituted, make them accountable to a wider stakeholder group than simply shareholders, and introduce employees to boards.

The proposals came in August but since then the opposition has grown in intensity. It’s worth reviewing Warren’s ideas and the reaction.

Review

Warren’s proposed shakeup for the law is aimed at one issue: shareholder primacy. In fact, Warren makes it the bȇte noir in Wall Street capitalism, claiming it as a major contributor to income inequalities. Castigating corporate America, she says boards are guilty of adopting the belief that their “only legitimate and legal purpose was maximising shareholder value.”

Warren writes: “…corporate America’s commitment to ‘maximizing shareholder return’ is a commitment to making the richest Americans even richer at all costs. There is an urgent need to return to the era when American corporations produced broad-based growth that helped workers and shareholders alike.”

Warren holds out Kickstarter, Patagonia and Danone North America as prime examples of the kind of responsible company she wants more of in the US.

She demands that US companies with annual turnovers of more than $1bn seek a “federal charter”.

But it comes with strings attached. Charter companies must pledge to “consider the interests of all corporate stakeholders, including employees, customers, shareholders and the communities in which the company operations.”

Warren also demands that boards must seek significant employee participation with 40% of members elected by workers, and a prohibition is proposed on the sale of all incentive shares within five years of issue. Board and shareholder approval must be sought for all political spending.

Lastly, a company found to have repeatedly broken the law can have its charter revoked, though time will be granted to resolve internal difficulties.

Warren holds out Kickstarter, Patagonia and Danone North America as prime examples of the kind of responsible company she wants more of in the US.

Rise of socialism

But much as UK Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn caused business leaders to choke on their cornflakes with proposals for mandatory partial ownership of companies by workers, Warren’s move has also provoked consternation among those for whom capitalism is an act of faith.

According to Jeb Hensarling, a Republican member of the House of Representatives: “Lest anyone question whether socialism continues its rise in the Democratic Party,” they should look no further than Warren’s legislative plan.

The criticism here (with a suggestion of Trump-esque hyperbole) is that Warren’s idea represents not only the imposition of “command and control” measures on the US economy but the “greatest expropriation of private property rights in our history”.

Hensarling also claims that employee representation is a slippery slope. “Does anyone doubt that 40% will soon become 51%?” Government, he says, will end up dictating corporate behaviour for “favoured stakeholders”. And it will all be a major turn-off for investors who are hardly likely to risk capital if they know they will lose control.

According to Skopos Labs, a research company, Warren’s proposals have only a 2% chance of being passed.

Elsewhere, the attack comes in a different form. According to Richard A. Epstein, a law professor at New York University, Warren’s measures fail because by her logic all organisations should include outside stakeholders on their boards, including unions who, perhaps, should allow bosses in their boardrooms. By extension: “Churches could be required to put apostates and atheists on their boards,” argues Epstein (though it is hard to see how apostates could claim to be stakeholders in a club to which, by their own act of conscience, they do not belong).

Epstein’s other claim is that, in any case, boards are interested in employee opinions, “but only by contract that decides who becomes a stakeholder and on what terms.”

And besides, writes Epstein, if it is such a good idea, surely someone would have done it already?

In truth, investors are concerned about Warren’s ideas. But they have also been moving in the same direction for some, and they could hardly be accused of being socialists. Fund managers like BlackRock have expressed concern that companies should focus on the long term and that boards spend more time considering wide stakeholders. Indeed, one fund manager in London, Hermes EOS, even advocates the inclusion of workers on boards. Investors have also increased their stewardship activities in recent years, which makes Warren’s effort to wrest away some of their control particularly painful.

Dirty word

Perhaps most confusing to investors, and others in the investment chain, is Warren’s characterisation of “shareholder return” as a dirty word. In many investment scenarios, the shareholders, or at least the beneficiaries of shareholders, are ordinary, working Americans and their pension funds.

“We need to understand that investors do have a social purpose,” one close observer of investor behaviour and governance told Board Agenda.

Elsewhere, others worry whether externally imposed governance measures carry the same weight as self-imposed change. Brett McDonnell, a professor at the University of Minnesota, is sympathetic to Warren’s motives and intent. Voting power for stakeholders, he argues, is a strong tool, but only if voluntary.

“Hostile managers will easily be able to comply with the letter but not the spirit of this proposed law,” says McDonnell in an article for the Harvard Law School Forum.

McDonnell suggests that companies should be incentivised to make the changes Warren seeks through tax reductions or “regulatory forbearance”.

Whatever the point of view, however, Warren’s chance of transforming the measures into law seem low. According to Skopos Labs, a research company, Warren’s proposals have only a 2% chance of being passed. The chances are slim.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Board effectiveness in the new world of work
    April 21, 2022
    Boardroom at sunrise

    Boards should use this post-pandemic period to reflect and reinvent themselves and their working practices.

  • The role of the board in times of distress
    April 17, 2020
    Team climbing a mountain using collaborative leadership

    If companies are to survive the coronavirus crisis, corporate boards need to exercise collaborative, proactive leadership.

  • Thousands of businesses in the dark about GDPR
    November 1, 2017
    Cybercrime, data protection, GDPR, cybersecurity

    More than 30% of UK businesses have done nothing to meet forthcoming GDPR rules, and almost a third have never even heard of it, new research shows.

  • A new culture of compliance in a complex environment
    February 14, 2019
    City of London, financial, banking

    The unprecedented pace of regulatory change in the financial services industry has led to substantial investment in the compliance function, but it needs greater support at board and executive levels in order to be effective.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Accountable Capitalism Act, capitalism, corporate governance, Elizabeth Warren, investors, Jeb Hensarling, US

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
  • Virtual AGMs fall out of favour
  • Cyber security reporting falls short
  • How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)
  • Consumers judge a company by its ‘morality’

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|