Skip to content

16 August, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • business transformation

      Business transformation is a priority now, say experts

      As business survival depends on adapting to the changing post-pandemic economic landscape, it's as well...

    • cyber disclosure Are cyber disclosure demands too high?

      Organisations increasingly struggle with cybersecurity as they balance fear of reputational damage against cyber disclosure...

    • News round-up: this week in governance

      PwC fined for BT audit; greenwashing sanctions; cost of living crisis; $300m pay deal; US...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • short selling investors

      How to beat short selling activism

      What would you do if your company was targeted by short-selling activist investors? Communication is...

    • ESG debate

      The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced

      The issues boards face are rarely straightforward, and ESG is no exception. It is time...

    • AI

      How to ensure governance of artificial intelligence (AI)

      An ISO standard issued this year gives guidance to boards on the governance implications of...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • cyber disclosure

      Are cyber disclosure demands too high?

      Organisations increasingly struggle with cybersecurity as they balance fear of reputational damage against cyber disclosure...

    • global warming ESG is not a ‘distraction’

      We must not let ESG become a scapegoat for the systemic failure of our society...

    • Man with magnifying glass The 30-year itch: time to ditch the UK Corporate Governance Code

      Now that governance has come of age, businesses should be able to innovate within the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • News round-up: this week in governance

      PwC fined for BT audit; greenwashing sanctions; cost of living crisis; $300m pay deal; US...

    • US boards diversity US boards slow diversity with poor retirement policies

      Only 6% of organisations have term limits for directors, and there is reluctance around mandatory...

    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Tory leadership contest; Grant Thornton fined; Norwegian insider dealing; virtual AGMs; US environmental disclosures; diversity...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

Resilient leadership: how leaders can survive trauma

by Andrew Kakabadse

How do leaders and organisations become resilient? Andrew Kakabadse considers how leaders can bounce back from mistakes and trauma.

Team of climbers at the top of a mountain

Image: Banana Oil / Shutterstock

Being resilient is not a clean concept, it is a result. Possessing a strong Resilience Quotient, or RQ, means having the ability to work through and survive a traumatic event, as well being able to face adversity on an ongoing basis.

The first RQ question to consider is “what are your organisation’s values?” When an organisation possesses multiple value statements, finance effects every decision. The focus is on short-term deals rather than long-term investment, so any effort to build a resilient community has little or no meaning.

It is clear that most organisations today are not resilient. Instead they are transactional and place great economic value on each asset the organisation owns.

Organisations also need to understand competitive advantage, and the most resilient achieve this by investing heavily in education, even when things are going badly for them. This can be illustrated by developing internal concepts or public policies.

Education systems are most likely to succeed when they take the form of “concept plus leisure”. One example is developing a policy of “we don’t hire the best for this transaction, we develop our own people to cope. If we need external experts we only bring them in if it’s absolutely necessary”.

Who creates a climate of resilience?

Resilience should always be led by the chairman or chief executive. It is important to establish who will gather the necessary evidence to quantify the need for enhanced resilience.

Rapid change from short-term financial focus to deep-rooted values is very difficult, and it is clear that most organisations today are not resilient. Instead they are transactional and place great economic value on each asset the organisation owns.

Identifying fracture points, places in the structure of an organisation where things go continually wrong, is fundamental to building organisational resilience. Both the management and the board know this, but relationships are often too sensitive to openly address these issues.

This ties in closely with the final element of RQ—the need to be realistic. RQ must be evidence-based so that the consequences of change can be measured and understood. It is of course possible to become overwhelmed by the volume of potential evidence, but the entire purpose of such a process is to bring everyone onto the same page.

What evidence should be gathered?

RQ data may evidence trends, specific business issues or investments details, but the most powerful evidence is how the organisation is currently “living?” What and where are the system blockages or fault lines? At which point are the values of the organisation not being adhered to, actively rejected or promoted?

Much of this is soft evidence, and resilience is based on hard data, such as, “If we buy this, how much will it cost?” or “If we do that, what will the outcome be in terms of profit?” Evidence-gathering has many phases. It includes collecting knowledge about what is going right and wrong, along with significant interviewing and testing.

By taking time to gather evidence that involves consequences and digesting information carefully, the organisation actually becomes more resilient.

When soft evidence has consequences built in, gathering data takes much longer. For example, “We have to get your opinion if we do this on what the consequences will be.” One opinion will differ slightly from another, then this information has to be aggregated. The result is that soft evidence collection becomes an expensive and time-consuming exercise.

The resulting challenge is that the organisation is left feeling slow and lacking in resilience. In fact the opposite is true. By taking time to gather evidence that involves consequences and digesting information carefully, the organisation actually becomes more resilient.

This is because fundamentally people say to themselves, “If circumstances dictate that I have no clever strategy for getting a bonus at John Lewis in the months immediately following 9/11, then at least I can understand and accept the situation.”

Quick evidence, on the other hand, focuses only on the transactions an organisation is committed to and the consequences are singularly based on this detail. This results in a “We want to do this, and if this is the case then these people will have to go because otherwise it blocks our plans.” The bigger, long-term plans and effects are lost for simplicity’s sake.

The ‘régler’

Academic literature refers to the “régler”—French parlance for someone who constantly adjusts. So if there is a problem we adjust the budgets, or target, or anything else that will eventually lead to success, rather than look at the bigger picture or problem.

The day after the UK referendum and decision to leave Europe, the public were told by the European Union that their budget and economic plans were finished. By law the UK would be entitled to complete its budget allocations for Europe until the day it exited the EU, but after this, officials and naysayers said all bets were off. This meant that anybody whose work depended on close links with Brussels would be cut out of their existing networks and there would no way for them to connect further.

“Resilience is the ability to recover from fumbles or outright mistakes and bounce back. But flexibility alone is not enough. You have to learn from your errors.”

–Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Harvard Business School

Would the UK government really accept this state of affairs? No, of course not. Instead they will continue to give the exact same amount of funding they currently contribute, so organisations and individuals will continue to network and complete projects as usual.

The régler response of “fix it for today” works on the assumption that such an arrangement will continue into the future indefinitely, without considering any long-term cultural damage caused to values and practices that are taking place. This outcome occurs when organisations avoid dealing in evidence and pretend to have firm values which simply don’t reflect everyday practice. When it comes to resilience and the régler, they will tell you that everything is fine, but actually nothing has changed.

As Rosabeth Moss Kanter, professor of business at Harvard Business School, explains: “Resilience is the ability to recover from fumbles or outright mistakes and bounce back. But flexibility alone is not enough. You have to learn from your errors.

“Those with resilience build on the cornerstones of confidence—accountability (taking responsibility and showing remorse); collaboration (supporting others in reaching a common goal); and initiative (focusing on positive steps and improvements). These factors underpin the resilience of people, teams, and organisations that can stumble but resume winning.”

Andrew Kakabadse is professor of governance and leadership at Henley Business School.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Deanna Mulligan: how smart companies can close the skills gap
    February 25, 2021
    Deana Mulligan

    We talk to Deanna Mulligan, former CEO and chair of Guardian Life Insurance Company of America, about solving the looming skills crisis.

  • Remote possibilities: can you really learn leadership online?
    April 21, 2020
    Woman working remotely on laptop

    While remote learning may be effective for certain skills and tasks, true leadership capabilities cannot be developed through a bundle of online modules.

  • How information overload can threaten board effectiveness
    February 14, 2019
    documents, business papers, board packs, board papers

    An increased focus on risk and compliance for financial services firms has led to a rise in committees, reporting and key performance indicators. But boards must ensure that short-term targets do not hamper long-term strategic vision.

  • How accountants can help build a culture of sustainability
    March 7, 2019
    green, growth, sustainability

    Accountants can embed lasting change in corporate culture by helping businesses to assess and communicate their non-financial information (NFI) and make the right decisions to ensure a more sustainable economy.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Andrew Kakabadse, board skills, CEOs, chairmen, effective board leadership, leadership, resilience

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Twitter drops due diligence bombshell
  • Ben & Jerry’s governance tested in court
  • ESG is not a ‘distraction’
  • The ESG debate needs to be more nuanced
  • How to beat short selling activism

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|