Skip to content

1 December, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Proxy adviser warns LSE

      Proxy adviser warns LSE over governance

      Abolishing the public register of shareholder revolts ‘won’t stop capital providers exercising their democratic rights’,...

    • sustainability governance Sustainability governance is on the rise

      But despite greater corporate attention being paid to ESG, directors’ engagement with it is losing...

    • Sam Altman News round-up: this week in governance

      OpenAI fires and rehires Sam Altman; is it OK for the Big Four to remain...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • purpose statement

      On purpose: crafting an authentic statement

      Purpose statements define how organisations align purpose and people. Here’s how to make a statement...

    • first-time CFO

      How to succeed as a first-time CFO

      The remit and responsibilities of the chief financial officer have changed, which can seem daunting...

    • ethical culture

      How to embed an ethical culture

      Business success depends on purpose—and therefore ethics—being the top item on any organisation’s board agenda.

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uk corporate governance

      Why UK corporate governance needs tightening up

      The LSE’s response to the government’s panicky U-turn on governance regulation is not helpful to...

    • faith in the UK Audit reform is essential to restore faith in the UK

      When it comes to understanding what attracts investors to a capital market, the London Stock...

    • U-turn on audit reform An uncomfortable U-turn on audit reform

      The government’s bonfire of the regulations expected for audit reform creates a source of uncertainty...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • reporting elements Boards urged to retain ‘beneficial’ reporting elements

      Although the government cancelled the requirement, resilience disclosures ‘cannot be wasted effort’, says senior auditco...

    • energy transition Collaboration is key to UK energy transition

      Communication, innovation and engagement are needed for the move to net zero, an expert panel...

    • helle bank jorgensen Helle Bank Jørgensen on governance, ESG and how board directors can become stewards of the future

      In spite of ESG toxicity in the US, she remains optimistic that companies are working...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • gender diversity study Academics criticise BlackRock gender diversity research

      Its methodology came under fire, with some critics also pointing out it was wrong to...

    • diversity of thought How to boost diversity of thought

      Companies benefit from diverse workforces, but also from having the input of different opinions and...

    • minority NED Number of minority NEDs drops

      Although there is some progress in diversity in other board roles, research suggests that boards...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Risk Map: Top Risks 2024

      Control Risks' Top Risks for 2024 cut across the geopolitical, security, operational, regulatory, and cyber/digital...

    • A Director’s Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations 2023

      An internal investigation must be handled meticulously to avoid legal exposure, regulatory or criminal prosecution...

    • Spencer Stuart UK Board Index Highlights 2023 cover

      Spencer Stuart UK Board Index Highlights 2023

      The 2023 UK Spencer Stuart Board Index is a review of board composition and governance...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

New world order for global banking

by Aktis & Nestor Aktis & Nestor SPONSORED

Since the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the ensuing crisis, the global financial system is safer and more robust, with stronger governance and regulation. But there remain striking differences between the structure and governance of US and European banks, which only the next crisis will truly put to the test.

Aktis, banking

Image: Shutterstock

 

 

Ten years on from the collapse of Lehman Brothers, and the financial system is safer, more robust and governance has improved. The previous “light-touch” approach to regulation has been replaced by a much stricter supervisory regime, but while the world’s biggest financial institutions have adapted, striking differences still exist between US and European banks—and only the next crisis will tell which is most effective.

At the end of 2017, there were 30 financial institutions defined by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision as globally systemically important banks (G-SIBs). These are defined as the banks that pose the greatest threat to the global financial system. Of these, eight were in the US and 13 in Europe. The boards of G-SIBs in both US and European jurisdictions have adopted some common features since the global financial crisis, and there is much to admire. They have become smaller in size, more independent and more experienced in terms of financial industry experience and risk management expertise.

Research from Aktis, a leading provider of bank governance data, shows some striking similarities in the adoption of governance good practice. In both the US and Europe, the average board size of G-SIBs has shrunk to 13 members from 15 in 2007. Smaller boards are considered more effective when it comes to communication, co-ordination of tasks and decision-making effectiveness.

board independence, banking, Aktis

Segmented boards

G-SIBs on both sides of the Atlantic have segmented their boards into more specialist committees. According to Aktis, the average number of board sub-committees at US banks increased to 5.9 in 2016, compared with 4.1 a decade ago. In Europe, G-SIBs had an average of 5.2 board committees in 2016, compared with 3.8 in 2007. Banks have radically improved their risk management processes, with all G-SIBs in both the US and Europe establishing specialist committees.  This stands in stark contrast to a decade ago, when only JP Morgan had a standalone risk committee, according to Aktis.

There has been a sharp rise in the number of banks establishing conduct and value committees following the billions of dollars paid out by big banks in legal fines as a result of industry-wide malpractice: from PPI insurance in the UK, to the rigging of foreign exchange benchmarks across the globe. The improvement in corporate governance has come about as a result of the introduction of new regulations, such as the Capital Requirements Directive IV (CRD IV), which called for an increase in independent non-executive directors on bank boards.   

“In the US, the board is king and as the CEO is usually chairman of the board, that places ultimate power and accountability in the hands of an individual.”

–Stilpon Nestor, Nestor Advisors

For the large part, G-SIBs in both the US and Europe have adopted international best practice but they still have striking differences, not least in their fundamental approach to leadership; US banks still believe in the joint CEO/chairman role, while European banks have embraced a dual-board structure.

“In the US, the board is king and as the CEO is usually chairman of the board, that places ultimate power and accountability in the hands of an individual,” says Stilpon Nestor, founder and CEO of governance advisory firm Nestor Advisors. “In Europe it is the complete opposite. The board is not king and shareholders are still very powerful.”

According to Aktis, 88% of  G-SIBs are still led by a single executive serving as both chairman and CEO. Only two US G-SIBs have split the role. One is Citigroup, which was the biggest casualty of the financial crisis; and the second is Wells Fargo, which split the role in the wake of a retail banking scandal in 2016. As for the rest, the CEO holds both roles, effectively controlling the board. This stands in stark contrast to European G-SIBS, where no bank has a combined CEO and chair, and in most cases, the chairman holds a non-executive role. 

This divergent approach to leadership at the very top of the institution has some obvious consequences. In the US, the joint CEO/chairman holds the power, and governance is centred more on individual than on collective leadership.

Game-changer

There have been some changes since the crisis, and some of the primacy of the US chairman/CEO has eroded. “The game-changer was the introduction of the Dodd-Frank Act, which introduced a sweeping set of rules such as the obligation to appoint a senior independent director, as well as proxy access,” Nestor explains. “The chairman is no longer driving the nominations process. There is proxy access and shareholder activism, but the concept remains the same that the CEO is where the power lies.”

In European banks, there is a duality of approach, where the supervisory board is intimately involved in setting strategy for the management board, and hiring and firing the CEO. “The dual board structure brings complexity, but it is less risky, because the management committee is held accountable by the board,” Nestor adds. Moreover, non-executive chairs are almost universally preferred among European G-SIBs, with only HSBC and Santander having an executive chair.

Aktis, average CEO tenure

Bank bosses in the US typically enjoy a longer tenure than their EU counterparts. JP Morgan’s current CEO Jamie Dimon was appointed 13 years ago, while this year Lloyd Blankfein stepped down as CEO and chairman of Goldman Sachs after 12 years at the helm. Between 2006 and 2015, US bank CEOs enjoyed an average tenure of a decade, compared with four years for EU banks, according to Aktis. That has started to change but discrepancies continue to exist more at board level. Lisa Andersson, head of research at Aktis, says: “In the decade since the collapse of Lehman, our data shows European banks have refreshed 94% of their non-executive directors. By contrast, US bank boards are more stale, with a refreshment rate of 70%.”

Among US G-SIBS, the average tenure of board members stood at 7.7 years in 2016, compared with 8.1 years a decade previously, according to Aktis. This differs significantly with European G-SIBs, where average tenure has fallen to 5.3 years, from 5.6 in 2006.

By contrast, European banks such as Credit Agricole, Barclays and Standard Chartered have renewed their entire board in the past decade, representing almost a quarter of the region’s G-SIBs. In the US, only Wells Fargo has conducted a complete overhaul of its board since 2008.

NEDs, Aktis

Regular board refreshment

Regular refreshment of the board is important because it can promote diversity, strengthen expertise and bring fresh perspectives that challenge the status quo. This is a crucial step in avoiding groupthink—an ingrained philosophy that can prevent management and boards from anticipating risks. A more powerful board has led to a higher level of CEO churn in European banks. Since the crisis of 2007, all European G-SIBs have replaced their chief executive, with a number having been ousted by the board.

However, there is a balance to strike. Aktis found that better-performing European G-SIBS during the financial crisis in terms of pre-tax profits tended to have more mature boards. For example, Santander and Nordea, which largely avoided the crisis, had an average board tenure of 9.7 and 6.5 years respectively in 2016, according to Aktis. “In banking, stability comes at a premium,” says Nestor.

In terms of performance, the US G-SIBS have emerged stronger from the financial crisis. They have posted bigger profits, and are trading at higher multiples than their European rivals—particularly those with big investment banking arms, which triggered the crisis. Firms like Barclays and Deutsche Bank have been through several strategy iterations since 2010. Barclays is on to its third CEO, and Deutsche Bank has had five CEOs in the same period.

Regulation

But many of the gains made by US banks have to do with regulation rather than governance. US supervisory bodies formulated a rapid and robust response to the crisis, recapitalising the banking sector through its Tapered Asset Relief Programme (TARP). In crude terms, the US banks took their medicine early and that enabled them to rebound much more quickly. The US followed TARP with tough stress tests and, as a result, its banks hold more tier-two capital than their European counterparts. 

“By and large, US supervisory authorities such as the SEC, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve have paid more attention to prudential supervision than governance,” says Nestor. With the exception of the UK, European supervisory bodies did not force a broad re-capitalisation of the banking sector, but instead turned their focus to governance reform. The idea of a joint CEO/chairman has been banished and with it the previously common practice of bank bosses moving to become chair when they step down as CEO. 

Aktis, board expertise, banking

European banks have embraced global reforms, such as the Basel Committee’s corporate governance principles and the Financial Stability Board’s adoption of the G20 proposals. Some jurisdictions have gone further. UK banks have ring-fenced their investment banks to protect depositors in the event of a fresh liquidity crisis, while it has also introduced the Senior Managers Regime, which holds individuals to account for missteps and governance failures.

While US banks can point to strong performance under their combined CEO/chairman structures, it’s hard to know how much of their success can be attributed to governance.

US supervisory authorities have dragged their heels in adopting some aspects of global standards, but there are signs that is changing. Last year, the Federal Reserve published a consultation paper on a corporate governance proposal to enhance the effectiveness of boards of directors. The Fed’s proposal aims to refocus supervisory expectations for the largest firms’ boards of directors on their core responsibilities, which will promote the safety and soundness of the firms.

The corporate governance proposal is made up of three parts. First, it identifies the attributes of effective boards of directors, such as setting a clear and consistent strategic direction for the firm as a whole, supporting independent risk management, and holding the management of the firm accountable. For the largest institutions, Federal Reserve supervisors would use these attributes to inform their evaluation of a firm’s governance and controls.

Second, it clarifies that for all supervised firms, most supervisory findings should be communicated to senior management for corrective action, rather than to its board of directors.

And third, the proposal identifies existing supervisory expectations for boards of directors that could be eliminated or revised. If implemented, these proposals would bring US bank boards more in line with their European rivals, although the Fed’s consultation phase comes at a time when the Trump administration is considering loosening some of the Dodd-Frank reforms.

Aktis, banking, women on boards

Both US and European banks have adopted more robust governance in their overseas operations. European G-SIBs have been forced to create US holding companies with their own capital and liquidity thresholds, and have appointed separate boards of directors. US banks have also appointed independent boards for their overseas operations. 

While US banks can point to strong performance under their combined CEO/chairman structures, it’s hard to know how much of their success can be attributed to governance. Meanwhile, it should be remembered that Lehman Brothers was brought to its knees by an all-powerful management team, led by a joint chairman/CEO who wielded excessive power. The same can be said of Bear Stearns, whose chairman and chief executive Jimmy Cayne was at bridge tournaments while the bank he was responsible for teetered on the brink of collapse before a Fed-enforced takeover by JP Morgan.

For all of its complexity, duality makes for a safer control environment, while the introduction of measures that hold individuals accountable for failures constitutes good governance. At the same time, European supervisory bodies have micro-managed governance, while the Basel Committee is pushing ahead with new rules that force banks to adopt standardised risk models, a move that could potentially undermine their proprietary controls.

The past decade has been remarkable for a relative lack of volatility, and an extended bull market supported by central bank largesse. With volatility returning amid an uncertain geopolitical environment, the robustness of banks’ new governance structures in the face of a future downturn will be a true test of how far G-SIBs have come on both sides of the Atlantic.

This article was produced in association with Aktis and Nestor Advisors, which are supporters of Board Agenda.

Aktis, Nestor Advisors

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • A remixed roadmap for the future of board leadership
    October 18, 2021
    Team climbing a mountain using collaborative leadership

    A recent report identifies the need for a new governance model that reflects the changing responsibilities of boards and their leaders.

  • The war for talent: creating competitive advantage through diversity
    December 7, 2021
    Magnet attracting diverse talent

    Companies that strategically invest in diversity and building an inclusive culture will become talent magnets in today's challenging market.

  • The diversity narrative: a strategy for improved performance
    April 11, 2022
    Diverse group of colleagues celebrating

    Research has shown a clear correlation between diversity and performance. How can organisations create their own diversity narrative?

  • New CEO appointments reflect 'multi-dimensional role' amid the pandemic
    November 18, 2021
    Directors waiting for an interview

    Boards have appointed a greater number of women, non-nationals and candidates with an advanced degree or MBA during the past year.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Aktis, banking, banking governance, banking regulation, Basel Committee, Dodd Frank Act, Europe, G-SIBs, Stilpon Nestor, US

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us





Most Popular

  • Why UK corporate governance needs tightening up
  • How to succeed as a first-time CFO
  • How to embed an ethical culture
  • Director Reference Guide: board governance and leadership on data
  • On purpose: crafting an authentic statement

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations 2023

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|

Copyright © 2023 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap