Skip to content

27 March, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Mars ESG

      News round-up: this week in governance

      Mars CEO defends ESG and purpose; US president vetoes anti-ESG bill; trust can negatively affect...

    • ChatGPT technology Could ChatGPT technology join the board?

      Although governance may stop artificial intelligence replacing anyone on the board today, AI may soon...

    • ethical decision-making Call for FTSE 100 companies to give guidance on ethics

      Most top firms have a published code of ethics, but many lack the framework to...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • data decision

      How to boost decision making

      Innovative digital tools can help boards to deliver against strategic objectives, but it is the...

    • remote working

      Navigating the new world of work

      Firms need to focus on building an inclusive environment and a culture of trust to...

    • digital transformation

      Digital transformation: Get the basics right

      Board involvement at the get-go will boost the chances of a successful digital transformation for...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uncertainty in 2023

      Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty

      Agility, planning in the shorter term and bravery will all stand chief executives in good...

    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • female ceo Less than a third of FTSE 100 executives are women

      In Europe as a whole, only 7.7% of top companies’ chief executives are female, gender...

    • board size Performance declines as boards grow in size

      Researchers found that investment dropped by 2-3 percentage points as companies passed from 12 to...

    • Silicon Valley governance Silicon Valley improves its governance

      Big technology companies are stealing a march over other top corporates when it comes to...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Diligent report

      Forrester: The Total Economic Impact Of Diligent Board & Leadership Collaboration

      Diligent Board Leadership & Collaboration reduced the risk of confidential material loss, supported decision-making, and...

    • Gender diversity barometer

      Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe

      The 2023 Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe looks at the 16...

    • geopolitical risk airmic

      Navigating geopolitical risk

      Today, the future feels less secure, and optimism is more restrained. Taking decisions in an...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

PwC heavily criticised for ‘failed’ audit of BHS

by Gavin Hinks on August 15, 2018

A report from the Financial Reporting Council delivers scathing criticism of PwC’s audit of collapsed retail chain BHS and the partner who headed the work.

PwC

Photo: Shutterstock

PwC’s audit of collapsed high-street department store BHS included failings in ethical standards, according to a stinging report from regulators.

The report also revealed that Steven Denison, the engagement partner for BHS, had spent just two hours on the audit of financial statements for the company and parent Taveta Group.

According to a report from the Financial Reporting Council, (FRC) the audit work also failed across planning and considerations of going concern, impairment and the company’s income statement.

The FRC said there were also breaches of International Standards of Auditing.

In June the FRC announced that PwC had been fined £10m (reduced to £6.5m) and severely reprimanded for audit work on BHS financial statements for the year ending August 2014.

“We are sorry that our work fell well below the professional standards expected of us and that we demand of ourselves.”

–PwC

Steven Denison, PwC’s engagement partner on the audit and the head of UK assurance for the firm at the time, was fined £500,000 (reduced to £325,000) and banned from “any audit work” for 15 years. He was forced to remove his name from the list of statutory auditors.

Both Denison and PwC admitted misconduct.

BHS was bought by Sir Phillip Green for £200m in 2000. The store became part of the Taveta Group in 2009 and was then sold in 2015 to Retail Acquisitions, owned by Dominic Chappell. In April 2019 BHS went into administration.

“The admitted miconduct will tend to undermine confidence in the standards of conduct of auditors and audit firms and in the profession generally,” the FRC said.

The FRC concluded that Denison “was in large part responsible for the misconduct.”

“In the case of Mr Denison, the misconduct involved a failure to conduct business with integrity in relation to the circumstances surrounding the signing off of the audit for BHS for the year ending 30 August, 2014.”

The FRC report said PwC and Denison failed to “guard against the self-interest threat created by the substantial fees they generated in providing non-audit services to the Taveta Group.” Audit fees for 2014 were £335,000 while non-audit fees amounted to £2.85m, though the FRC said papers suggest the figure could have been as high as £3.3m. According to the report, Denison was the “single point of contact” for Sir Phillip Green.

The FRC said PwC and Denison had “not obtained a going concern assessment from management,” and in particular how BHS would remain a going concern without financial support from Taveta Group as it had done in previous years.

The report said PwC failed to consider several indicators that BHS was not a going concern.

“The Respondents gave no consideration to how these matters may have impacted BHS’s ability to continue as a going concern,” the report said. “They failed to gather any audit evidence on which to conclude that the going concern assumption was appropriate. Based on the audit evidence obtained, they should have concluded that a material uncertainty existed about BHS Group and BHS’s ability to continue as going concerns.”

According to the report, BHS had significant net liabilities as turnover fell, and had made provision for loss-making stores and deficits in the company’s defined benefits pension scheme. Taveta had submitted an application to restructure the pension. “This was an indicator of potential insolvency…” the FRC said.

PwC said: “We are sorry that our work fell well below the professional standards expected of us and that we demand of ourselves. This is unacceptable and we agreed the settlement recognising that it is important to learn the necessary lessons . . . Whilst the failings did not contribute to the collapse of BHS over one year later, they were serious.”

According to the Financial Times, Denison has accepted the FRC ruling and regretted the “mistakes’ that led to it.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Audit committee chairs 'are confusing quality of audit and quality of service'
    February 2, 2022
    Calculator on top of business report

    FRC report also warns that audit committee chairs have a "negative perception of joint audits", despite this being a key reform proposal.

  • A remixed roadmap for the future of board leadership
    October 18, 2021
    Team climbing a mountain using collaborative leadership

    A recent report identifies the need for a new governance model that reflects the changing responsibilities of boards and their leaders.

  • Katie Murray to become chair of Phoenix board audit committee
    July 12, 2022
    retirement

    The pensions savings and life insurance group appointed Murray, who had been serving as a NED, to assume the role in September.

  • FRC unveils new audit committee standards
    November 10, 2022
    audit committee standards

    Watchdog’s guidance to audit committees aims at expanding choice and addressing competition within the audit market.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

audit, BHS, corporate governance, Financial Reporting Council, PwC, Sir Phillip Green, Steve Denison, Taveta

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Could ChatGPT technology join the board?
  • Larry Fink puts focus on finance and inflation
  • ESG resilience requires leaders to manage without certainty
  • Call for FTSE 100 companies to give guidance on ethics
  • Into the mind of white-collar criminals

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|