Skip to content

24 March, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ChatGPT technology

      Could ChatGPT technology join the board?

      Although governance may stop artificial intelligence replacing anyone on the board today, AI may soon...

    • ethical decision-making Call for FTSE 100 companies to give guidance on ethics

      Most top firms have a published code of ethics, but many lack the framework to...

    • BlackRock Larry Fink Larry Fink puts focus on finance and inflation

      Although BlackRock’s CEO does not mention the term ‘ESG’ in his annual letter, he highlights...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • data decision

      How to boost decision making

      Innovative digital tools can help boards to deliver against strategic objectives, but it is the...

    • remote working

      Navigating the new world of work

      Firms need to focus on building an inclusive environment and a culture of trust to...

    • digital transformation

      Digital transformation: Get the basics right

      Board involvement at the get-go will boost the chances of a successful digital transformation for...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uncertainty in 2023

      Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty

      Agility, planning in the shorter term and bravery will all stand chief executives in good...

    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • female ceo Less than a third of FTSE 100 executives are women

      In Europe as a whole, only 7.7% of top companies’ chief executives are female, gender...

    • board size Performance declines as boards grow in size

      Researchers found that investment dropped by 2-3 percentage points as companies passed from 12 to...

    • Silicon Valley governance Silicon Valley improves its governance

      Big technology companies are stealing a march over other top corporates when it comes to...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Diligent report

      Forrester: The Total Economic Impact Of Diligent Board & Leadership Collaboration

      Diligent Board Leadership & Collaboration reduced the risk of confidential material loss, supported decision-making, and...

    • Gender diversity barometer

      Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe

      The 2023 Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe looks at the 16...

    • geopolitical risk airmic

      Navigating geopolitical risk

      Today, the future feels less secure, and optimism is more restrained. Taking decisions in an...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Why it is time to take stock of governance in banking

by Aktis Aktis SPONSORED

In the decade since the collapse of Lehman Brothers triggered the global financial crisis, governance and leadership roles in banking have been transformed for the better. But is it now time for banks to assess progress, and question whether it is necessary to reduce the regulatory burden and the increasingly one-size-fits-all approach taken by supervisory bodies?

banking regulation, Atkis

Image: Shutterstock

The previous “light-touch” model of bank regulation that preceded and created the conditions for the global financial crisis has been replaced by a far stricter supervisory regime, following the introduction of a welter of new regulations—both across the European Union and on a local level—as well as greater scrutiny from shareholders angered by the destruction of value that ensued.

As a result, banks are now safer from a capital perspective and its executives are more accountable than ever before. Change has been rapid, startling and undeniable. Bank boards are now smaller, work harder and more efficiently and have a higher level of expertise than a decade ago, while gender diversity has improved.

Fresh leadership has emerged on a tide of greater accountability. In the past decade, on average 86% of board membership has been refreshed at Europe’s top banks, according to Aktis, a global consultancy which provides bank governance data.

The Aktis data, which draws on an extensive analysis of corporate governance at the biggest 25 banks in Europe by market capitalisation since the financial crisis, shows that in total 32% of top European banks have changed their board completely since 2008.

“Previously bank governance was a black box for regulators and supervisors,” says Stilpon Nestor, founder and CEO of governance advisory firm Nestor Advisors. “In the previous era of light-touch regulation there was an assumption from the regulator that it was the business of the firm to do what it liked when it came to governance. The change from that position has been significant and most welcome.”

Atkis, board chair profile

While some banks are still trying to find the right business model, governance has been transformed both through a raft of new regulations and increased supervision as the introduction of legislation such as the Capital Requirements Directive IV (CRD IV) on a Europe-wide level, as well as local initiatives, have transformed the governance landscape for the better.

“Supervisors have also developed quite detailed expectations as to what they want to see from governance, and in their supervisory on-sites they are more focused than ever on governance issues,” says Nestor.

Banks are more robust with stronger capital buffers, and executives are more accountable, with new rules on compensation providing boards with the power to claw back bonuses where they see evidence of misconduct. Some local supervisors have gone even further, such as in the UK, where the introduction of the Senior Managers Regime by the Financial Conduct Authority has made top executives accountable and personally liable for strategic and operational shortcomings. Monitoring is stronger than ever.

As a condition of CRD IV, all top European banks must conduct regular assessments of the effectiveness, composition and functioning of the board and just under half disclose that they retain an external adviser to facilitate this evaluation. Aktis has a key role to play in this dialogue.

Checks and balances

The central role of the board is to provide checks and balances on senior management and to ensure the company is working in the long-term interests of its shareholders. Regulation has ironed out the inherent weaknesses that previously existed on the boards of big banks.

In the run-up to the crisis, bank boards became dominated by individuals with little or no financial experience, and therefore little understanding of the increasingly complex financial instruments that exacerbated the global contagion which, in turn, accelerated the crisis.

The Aktis report shows that each of the top 25 European banks now have at least one non-executive director on the board with recent senior management experience in the financial industry, and 44% now include at least one non-executive on the board who has held a senior risk management position.

The influx of new board members has brought greater independence and have been specifically selected where they have relevant industry experience, while there is also an improved gender balance at board level. The role of non-executive directors has also evolved, with boards of financial institutions demanding a greater time commitment. On average, the workload per director has increased by a third compared with pre-crisis levels, and pay has doubled, Aktis says.

The proliferation of more non-executives on bank boards is the result of shareholder pressure, while regulators have also moved to stamp out some of the worst excess. The introduction of CRD IV in 2014 heralded the end of the joint CEO/chairman role at European banks. This had grown out of the role of the old-style executive chairman, who gradually took on more and more responsibility before becoming an all-conquering force that was difficult to control.

The eradication of that role means that the profile of the chair of the board has undergone a radical shift, with 80% of banks having appointed a new chairman since 2008. Fifty-two percent of chairmen are now independent non-executives, compared with 29% a decade ago, according to Aktis. At the same time, the splitting of the role means that new-style bank chair people are taking on more executive responsibility amid greater levels of delegation from the CEO.

Aktis board numbers

Risk management sits at the centre of banking and it is no coincidence that those firms which escaped the crisis relatively unscathed were those with a strong risk culture. Conversely, those banks that were bailed out by taxpayers either had inadequate risk management or neutered the function as it was regarded as an unhelpful brake on runaway growth, rather than an essential means of preserving shareholder value.

Banks have strengthened their risk function, and the chief risk officer is now a member of the management committee of all banks, compared with only 55% in 2007. Heads of compliance and legal functions are increasingly members of management committees, as the Aktis data shows.

Board sizes have shrunk, enabling greater control and more debate. Smaller boards are generally considered to be more effective and cohesive while they have segmented their work into more specialist committees.

Indeed, the number of committees supporting the board has grown consistently since 2008, driven in part by the mandatory separation of the audit and risk committee into two distinct entities. The increased focus on the role of the board has prompted a growing number of banks to establish more and more committees focusing on regulatory and compliance matters, as well as culture, conduct and reputation as they emerge from numerous crisis-era scandals that have cost the industry billions of dollars in fines.

Aktis

Force for good

The significant progress in governance and supervision has undoubtedly been a force for good, but the seemingly constant tide of new regulation has also given rise to unintended consequences and there are fears that excessive regulation and the shifting structure of boards risks undermining banks’ systems of governance.

“We should be now entering an era where we take stock of what has been done and possibly adjust it, not with more but with less,” says Nestor. “While it’s right to say it’s been a force for good overall, it is not 100% good. For example, there is micromanagement from the supervisor in certain cases.”

In some cases, the guidance has become too rigid, such as the requirement from the European Banking Authority preventing the chairperson of the board from occupying a similar position on the governance committee. This could undermine the ability of the board to hold management to account, replicating the situation pre-crisis where management committees enjoyed unrivalled power.

“There is a misconception that you have to distribute power and create a structure where every committee competes and challenges one another,” explains Nestor. “That’s not how boards work. Boards are there to challenge management, and to do that there needs to be somewhere on the board where there is power—and that should rest with the chairperson.”

The rise of the non-executive

The rise in the number of non-executive directors to challenge senior management and take a view on strategy is welcome, but in some cases, this has been accompanied by a reduction in the number of executives who sit on bank boards.

“A bank’s executives are the people who run the bank and are directly accountable to the shareholders and members of the board,” explains Nestor. “The more executives who sit on a board, the more other members can gain a clear picture of the bench strength of the executive team.”

At the same time, having too many non-executives means that decision-making power is concentrated in the hands of people who are not full-time employees of the bank and are not present at the coal-face, and therefore not aware of the many challenges a bank faces daily.

Aktis NED workload

The raft of new regulation was designed to solve the last crisis and fix the mistakes of the past, but there is a danger that this could mean the seeds of the next crisis are overlooked.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is looking to implement the next phase of regulatory reform—known as Basel IV—which, among other things, could result in the imposition of standardised measures for operational risk.

“The evolution of regulation means banks have moved from ‘light-touch’ to the other end of the spectrum, where they can no longer build their own machines when it comes to risk,” says Nestor. “It’s important to have a common denominator of transparency, but banks should have the ability to use internal models to mitigate and understand risk.”

Bank governance has been transformed over the past decade, leading to more rigour and boards that work harder, have more expertise and are more diverse. But banks should now assess how far they have come and monitor whether they have the right composition of talent on their boards, to ensure they are best-placed to deal with the next crisis when it comes.


Ten years on: Bank governance in numbers

Key findings from Aktis:

• The average board size has shrunk to 14 from 16 in 2007

• 80% of banks have appointed a new chair since 2008

• 34% of women are on bank boards, up from 15% in 2007

• 66% of NEDs have financial expertise, compared with 38% a decade ago

• Total remuneration for NEDs has increased by 60% but so has time commitment

• 86% of banks disclose that the board has set a process to review culture and risk culture

• 70% of banks have joint meetings between audit and risk committees, up from 35% in 2007

This article has been prepared in collaboration with Aktis, a supporter of Board Agenda.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Companies must put equality at the heart of the race to zero
    November 10, 2021
    Trees reflected in buildings

    Singular pursuit of net-zero by 2050 could exacerbate inequality and derail our chances of a climate-resilient future.

  • 'The most important topic we discuss is the safety of our people'
    March 4, 2022
    Ukraine energy company DTEK logo

    Ukrainian firms are facing huge operational challenges, as well as responsibilities to their employees and the economy of their country.

  • CEOs under fire: the psychology of leaders in a warzone
    March 11, 2022
    Bullet hole in glass in front of Ukrainian flag

    The business world expects bosses to perform under pressure, not under fire. How are corporate leaders in Ukraine dealing with the crisis?

  • Board effectiveness in the new world of work
    April 21, 2022
    Boardroom at sunrise

    Boards should use this post-pandemic period to reflect and reinvent themselves and their working practices.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Aktis, banking regulation, Board composition, corporate accountability, corporate governance, financial crisis, Nestor Advisors, non-executive directors, risk management, Spring 2018

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ESG resilience requires leaders to manage without certainty
  • Into the mind of white-collar criminals
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Top stories of 2022: corporate governance gets political
  • Larry Fink puts focus on finance and inflation

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|