Skip to content

20 March, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • woke silicon valley bank

      News round-up: this week in governance

      GOP declares SVB ‘woke’; banks slow to sustainability; fund managers accused of dodging voting risks;...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • ESG resilience requires leaders to manage without certainty

      Boards lack the understanding needed to face environmental and social challenges, according to LBS professor.

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • data decision

      How to boost decision making

      Innovative digital tools can help boards to deliver against strategic objectives, but it is the...

    • remote working

      Navigating the new world of work

      Firms need to focus on building an inclusive environment and a culture of trust to...

    • digital transformation

      Digital transformation: Get the basics right

      Board involvement at the get-go will boost the chances of a successful digital transformation for...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uncertainty in 2023

      Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty

      Agility, planning in the shorter term and bravery will all stand chief executives in good...

    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • female ceo Less than a third of FTSE 100 executives are women

      In Europe as a whole, only 7.7% of top companies’ chief executives are female, gender...

    • board size Performance declines as boards grow in size

      Researchers found that investment dropped by 2-3 percentage points as companies passed from 12 to...

    • Silicon Valley governance Silicon Valley improves its governance

      Big technology companies are stealing a march over other top corporates when it comes to...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Gender diversity barometer

      Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe

      The 2023 Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe looks at the 16...

    • geopolitical risk airmic

      Navigating geopolitical risk

      Today, the future feels less secure, and optimism is more restrained. Taking decisions in an...

    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Origins of investor stewardship and the Japan code

by Kerrie Waring

Abenomics brought a host of changes to Japan, not least the introduction of a new stewardship code for investors. The code is now being updated with new guidance, explains Kerrie Waring of the ICGN.

Japan, stewardship code, Abenomics

Image: Shutterstock

Stewardship is not a new concept. The seminal 1992 Cadbury Report recommended that investors should disclose their policies on the use of their voting rights. This was drawn from the UK’s Institutional Shareholders’ Committee (ISC) Guidance, which encouraged company engagement and voting—cornerstone principles of stewardship codes today.

The 1998 Committee on Corporate Governance, chaired by Ronnie Hampel, recommended that “pension fund trustees should encourage fund managers to take a long view in managing their investments” and to make considered use of their votes.

This, together with the Cadbury recommendations, then served as the basis for a dedicated section on investor responsibilities in the 2003 Combined Code on Corporate Governance, which focused on dialogue with companies, governance disclosures and voting.

In the same year, the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN) published a first Statement on Institutional Investor Responsibilities, now recognised as the ICGN Global Stewardship Principles (2016). This covered issues such as accountability and reporting to beneficiaries, voting practices and conflicts of interests.

Public criticism

Five years later, the financial crisis led to public criticism of the effectiveness of investors in being able to hold boards to account. The UK Treasury commissioned the Walker Review of Corporate Governance in the UK Banking Industry, which recommended “…a stewardship duty on institutional shareholders to play a more active role as owners of businesses”.

Then in 2010, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) adopted the ISC Guidance as the UK Stewardship Code, and took responsibility to oversee a list of  signatories. Under rules from the Financial Conduct Authority, asset managers are now required to disclose the “nature of their commitment to the code or alternative investment strategy”.

The principles of the code have not changed since 2010, though revisions were made to the guidance in 2012. The FRC will undertake a new code review later this year, which the ICGN expects will synchronise with EU Shareholder Rights Directive amendments.

Stewardship code adoption in Japan

In the UK, when the Stewardship Code was introduced in 2010, there was almost immediate acceptance of it  by the investment community, because the concept of stewardship had really been socialised and understood over a long period of time. 

In Japan’s case, the Stewardship Code came about from efforts to revitalise the economy—otherwise known as Abenomics after prime minister Shinzo Abe. The Financial Services Authority (FSA) was instructed to encourage investors to discharge their stewardship responsibilities to promote the sustainable growth of companies through constructive dialogue.

Many foreign investors have also played a helpful role in enhancing the credibility of the code to encourage domestic investors to commit…

This led to public consultation and the introduction of the Principles for Responsible Institutional Investors in February 2014. The code is voluntary, although the Japan FSA expects signatories to disclose against the principles.

Today, there are 214 signatories to the Japan code, 46% (99) of which are foreign, 74% (159) are asset managers, 23% (48) are asset owners and 3% (7) are “other”.

There is still work to be done to encourage more corporate pension fund participation, but there is high adoption from the asset management side. The successful implementation is due to the efforts of the FSA and also the leadership shown by Japan’s largest asset owner, GPIF (Government Investment Pension Fund), to champion the benefits of stewardship.

Many foreign investors have also played a helpful role in enhancing the credibility of the code to encourage domestic investors to commit, and we are hopeful that more local pension funds will signify their commitment to the code in due course.

Changes to Japan guidance

The updated version of Japan’s Principles for Responsible Institutional Investors was published in May this year. The FSA did not change any of the actual principles but they did make some important amendments to the guidance.

Firstly, in terms of stewardship policies, Japan now requires asset owners to include reference to stewardship obligations in asset manager selection, appointment and contracts. This includes monitoring asset manager performance with self-evaluation.

For conflicts of interests, there was a call for more detailed policies to include how conflicts are mitigated, with an emphasis on the need for independent and unbiased oversight of voting decisions. This is particularly important in Japan given the high level of cross-shareholdings affecting many listed companies.

For monitoring, little has changed, but it should be noted that it can be quite difficult in Japan given the fragmented nature of governance-related reporting and, for global investors, a lack of English-language disclosure.

The clustering of AGMs in June also leads to a crunch on information-gathering, which can impact the ability of investors to qualitatively analyse investee company governance.

For engagement, there was a lot of focus on the role of index funds given their increasing influence over voting and engagement. Direct engagement with companies in Japan is important as it helps to offset the effects of cross-shareholdings, which can inhibit the influence of voting.

The FSA has encouraged banks and insurance companies to reduce their cross-shareholdings, which is having a positive effect, but will take some time and therefore engagement is important as an overlay.

Mutual understanding

More generally, Japan takes a fairly diplomatic approach to engagement compared with the UK, and the code calls for companies and investors to arrive at a mutual understanding in the event of disagreements. The UK’s approach deals more directly with the need for investors to specify how they might escalate engagement tactics in the event of failed dialogue.

With collaboration, Japan does not have a standalone principle like the UK but has included reference to collaboration in the guidance for Principle 4 on engagement. Prior to the Japan Code revision there was no mention of collaboration, so this is an important step forward in facilitating more global investor engagement. 

In terms of reporting, culturally in Japan, and more generally in Asia, there is a formal approach to stewardship code compliance which has led to a degree of boilerplate disclosure.

There is still some nervousness among investors concerning the potential to be perceived as colluding in a negative way (for example, staging a hostile takeover) when in fact they wish to collaborate to improve the governance and sustainability of investee companies.

There are calls for further clarity to confirm that, as long as investors do not collude to vote in the same way on items related to the control and direction of the company (such as board elections), they will not breach rules regarding collective holding thresholds above which would trigger onerous reporting requirements.

For voting, Japan now calls for disclosure of voting records for each company by agenda item as well as by aggregate, and to explain their voting rationale. GPIF now requests that their managers disclose in this way. More “against” votes were cast on controversial issues this year compared with last year, and this experience is echoed in the UK. 

Formal approach

In terms of reporting, culturally in Japan, and more generally in Asia, there is a formal approach to stewardship code compliance which has led to a degree of boilerplate disclosure. That said, regulators in both the UK and Japan have reported a tangible increase in the quality and quantity of stewardship disclosures.

In the UK’s case, the FRC delisted around 20 signatories who failed to improve their stewardship disclosures in July. This followed a new tiering process to show variation in the quality of reporting. More work however is needed on the assessment of actual company engagements, which are more difficult to evidence.

The Japan Code also has a standalone principle on the importance of human resource, which now includes reference to competence at the leadership level of investment firms to ensure that stewardship is fully integrated across the organisation.

Investors have until the end of November 2017 to revise and publish their terms of compliance.

Kerrie Waring is executive director of the International Corporate Governance Network (ICGN).

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Battle of the boards: risk, ESG and two-tier board structures
    April 22, 2022
    Board risk meeting

    There is an inherent conflict of interest between main and executive boards, with two different time horizons and two different risk impacts.

  • Top stories of 2021: purpose and transformation amid the pandemic
    December 22, 2021
    Coloured lines unite to form red arrow

    Philosophical questions about corporate purpose and transformation joined ESG, diversity and AI as the thought-provoking themes of 2021.

  • Paul Manduca takes the wheel as chair of Eurowag
    September 16, 2021
    Paul Manduca, Eurowag

    The former chair of Prudential and Aon UK has joined the board of the commercial road transport services provider.

  • Cutting quarterly reporting may undermine the value of companies
    November 2, 2021
    Quarterly results in cityscape

    Research suggests a decrease in quarterly reporting is linked to decreased company value—and impacts smaller firms more than larger firms.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

abenomics, Autumn 2017, corporate governance, corporate reporting, Financial Reporting Council, ICGN, ICGN Global Stewardship Principles, Japan, Japan Stewardship Code, Principles for Responsible Institutional Investors

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ESG resilience requires leaders to manage without certainty
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty
  • Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’
  • How to boost decision making
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|