Skip to content

30 May, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • ESG battle

      ‘Change fiduciary laws’ to end ESG battle in US

      Academics suggest a truce between left and right, based on separating political issues from investment...

    • McDonald's antibiotics News round-up: this week in governance

      Investors challenge McDonald’s over antibiotic use; Norges Bank’s ESG push criticised; diversity box-ticking; revolt at...

    • boost audit Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls

      UK watchdog’s proposals include giving audit committees greater reporting responsibilities and addressing ‘overboarding’.

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

US watchdog raises hurdle for shareholder votes

by Gavin Hinks on November 3, 2017

Guidance from the US financial watchdog widens the use of a rule which allows companies to exclude shareholder proposals, potentially making it easier for companies to resist votes on social or ethical grounds.

SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission

Image: Shutterstock

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the US financial watchdog, has beefed up the guidance for shareholder proposals, potentially making it easier for companies to resist votes on social or ethical grounds.

In a legal bulletin posted this week, the regulator revealed guidance saying shareholder proposals could be excluded if they relate to “less than 5% total assets, net earnings and gross sales”.

The bulletin said: “Under this framework, proposals that raise issues of social or ethical significance may be included or excluded, notwithstanding their importance in the abstract…”

The bulletin comes from the corporation finance division of the SEC and relates to “14a-8(i)(5)”, which contains provisions for the grounds on which a company may exclude shareholder proposals—a so-called “no action request”. The SEC’s conclusion is that the rule has been narrowly applied until this time.

Reuters reported comments from the SEC, saying the guidance, published this week, “was not meant to tilt the scales”.

It added: “Accordingly, going forward, we would expect a company’s no-action request to include a discussion that reflects the board’s analysis of the particular policy issue raised and its significance. That explanation would be most helpful if it detailed the specific processes employed by the board to ensure that its conclusions are well informed and well reasoned.”

As part of its discussion the SEC writes in the bulletin that “determining whether a proposal is ‘otherwise significantly related to the company’s business’ can raise difficult judgment calls.

“Similarly, we believe that the board of directors is generally in a better position to determine these matters in the first instance.”

Reuters reported one asset manager saying that the guidance placed “new burdens of proof on investor proponents.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Shawn Purvis named as president and CEO of QinetiQ US
    January 31, 2022
    QinetiQ logo and website

    Purvis is currently corporate vice president at Northrop Grumman Corporation, where she leads the firm's enterprise services sector.

  • Shell faces shareholder litigation over climate risk
    March 15, 2022
    Shell logo

    Campaign group ClientEarth claims board members have breached their directors’ duties by failing to “properly prepare” for climate change.

  • Amazon shareholders call for tax transparency
    March 7, 2022
    Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon

    Investors want Amazon to use the Global Reporting Initiative’s Tax Standard to disclose its tax arrangements.

  • Ericsson faces shareholder ire over Iraq investigation
    March 29, 2022
    Ericsson building in Stockholm, Sweden

    Reports say investors including Cevian and Norges Bank will vote against a resolution to discharge board liability over compliance breaches.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

ethics, SEC, shareholder votes, shareholders, US

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • New audit committee standards finalised
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • Five AI issues to consider right now

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|