Skip to content

29 March, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • net zero plans

      Investors seek commitment to net zero planning

      Climate change campaigning investors have written to 107 companies, asking for prompt proof of net...

    • Mars ESG News round-up: this week in governance

      Mars CEO defends ESG and purpose; US president vetoes anti-ESG bill; trust can negatively affect...

    • ChatGPT technology Could ChatGPT technology join the board?

      Although governance may stop artificial intelligence replacing anyone on the board today, AI may soon...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • non-compete clause

      When employees become the competition

      How might you be affected by a global move towards the banning of employment contract...

    • data decision

      How to boost decision making

      Innovative digital tools can help boards to deliver against strategic objectives, but it is the...

    • remote working

      Navigating the new world of work

      Firms need to focus on building an inclusive environment and a culture of trust to...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uncertainty in 2023

      Being a CEO in 2023: how to navigate uncertainty

      Agility, planning in the shorter term and bravery will all stand chief executives in good...

    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • female ceo Less than a third of FTSE 100 executives are women

      In Europe as a whole, only 7.7% of top companies’ chief executives are female, gender...

    • board size Performance declines as boards grow in size

      Researchers found that investment dropped by 2-3 percentage points as companies passed from 12 to...

    • Silicon Valley governance Silicon Valley improves its governance

      Big technology companies are stealing a march over other top corporates when it comes to...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Diligent report

      Forrester: The Total Economic Impact Of Diligent Board & Leadership Collaboration

      Diligent Board Leadership & Collaboration reduced the risk of confidential material loss, supported decision-making, and...

    • Gender diversity barometer

      Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe

      The 2023 Barometer of Gender Diversity in Governing Bodies in Europe looks at the 16...

    • geopolitical risk airmic

      Navigating geopolitical risk

      Today, the future feels less secure, and optimism is more restrained. Taking decisions in an...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

The guardianship circle: praxis of governance and audit committees

by Niamh Brennan and Collette Kirwan

Why is the practice of corporate governance so different from best practice standards? Effective corporate governance “in practice” is fluid, context-specific and depends on practitioners’ skills, initiative and adaptation.

boardroom, best practice standards, corporate governance

Photo: Shutterstock

As anyone who has served on a board knows, what happens in practice in company boardrooms can be far different from best practice corporate governance standards, such as those promulgated in the Financial Reporting Council’s (FRC) UK Corporate Governance Code. Why is the practice of corporate governance so different from best practice standards?

The practice of corporate governance

We use the umbrella term, “the practice of corporate governance”, to refer to: (i) corporate governance best practices (i.e., social norms and rules, best practice); (ii) practitioners (e.g., chairmen, executive directors, non-executive directors, internal auditors, external auditors); and (iii) praxis (i.e., activities).

Once the human element (practitioners) is introduced, best practice becomes praxis. Regulators are aware of the disconnect between best practice and corporate governance in practice (i.e., praxis).

Regulators now emphasise the importance of disclosing praxis and not simply reporting compliance with practice.

For example, in its 2016 report, Corporate Culture and the Role of Boards, the FRC states: “The combination of legislation, regulation and codes provides a flexible framework for companies and their stakeholders to pursue their objectives and achieve long-term success. Success depends, however, on the spirit with which companies and investors apply the principles and use the flexibility they have.” (FRC, 2016, p4).

Regulators now emphasise the importance of disclosing praxis and not simply reporting compliance with practice (i.e., rules, best practice).

For example, the FRC’s Lab Project Report (2013) on reporting by audit committees emphasises the importance of audit committees “say[ing] what you did” (i.e., praxis) “not just what you do” (i.e., best practice).

The examples of audit committee reports cited in the FRC Lab Project Report highlight the importance of: (i) language (e.g., using “examined” instead of “reviewed”); (ii) instilling “soft” confidence/assurance (e.g., we reviewed and we are comfortable); (iii) adding “colour” to the description of audit committee work and avoiding boilerplate explanations; and (iv) personalising audit committee reports, perhaps creating a sense of familiarity and trust.

Thus, regulators seek better evidence that audit committees fulfil their oversight role including examples of the praxis (i.e., activities) they undertake in fulfilling their role.

Practices, practitioners and praxis

We illustrate best practice/practioners/praxis in Figure 1 (below) which shows how these three elements of the practice of corporate governance (our umbrella term) are connected.

The distinction between practices and what happens “in practice” depends on practitioners and their skills and initiative to convert practices into activities or “praxis”.

This distinction is captured by the FRC’s statement that “while legislation, regulation and codes influence individual and corporate behaviour, they do not ultimately control it”.

Practices inform praxis (A in Figure 1). Practitioners draw upon practices when they perform an activity. The conversion process from practices to praxis does not involve mindless reproduction of ascribed practices. Praxis represents activities that do not stand by themselves. Human actions create activities, and practitioners can change and improve those activities (or not).

The conversion process from practices to praxis does not involve mindless reproduction of ascribed practices.

Practitioners combine, coordinate and adapt practices to their needs and context (B in Figure 1). Without practitioners, practices (i.e., norms, rules, best practice) cannot be converted into praxis (i.e., activities).

Practitioners perceive, interpret and adapt practices to convert them into activities. They can shape activities through who they are, how they act and what practices they draw upon in their action.

Through this adaptation process, and in a recursive relationship, praxis can shape practices (C in Figure 1), i.e., in a feedback loop, corporate governance activities in practice (i.e., praxis) influence societal shared understandings of rules and norms of corporate governance that are shaped by practitioners’ interpretation and adaption of practices (B in Figure 1).

Thus, part of the resources of practice include corporate governance legislation, rules and norms, which practitioners both draw upon and change.

Illustrating the practice of corporate governance in audit committees

Figure 1 may appear quite abstract to readers. By applying Figure 1 to the work of audit committees in Figure 2 (below), we illustrate how our abstract model applies in a specific governance context—the work of audit committees.

Guardianship circle

The practice of corporate governance relies on practitioners interpreting and converting corporate governance practice into praxis.

However, audit committee members cannot operate the practice of corporate governance in isolation. In Figure 3, we show how the practice of corporate governance comes together in a guardianship circle, reflecting the higher-level duty of boards of directors to look after the best interests of the firm. Figure 3 illustrates the reciprocal evaluation processes between audit committees, external and internal auditors and managers, highlighted by the FRC (2013).

The guardianship circle implies that everyone is a guardian of everyone else. If audit committees exist in a guardianship circle, it is necessary to consider their role by reference to the role of others in the guardianship circle.

Thus, (i) audit committee members oversee the conduct of internal and external audits, (ii) internal and external auditors oversee the conduct of management and (iii) management has opportunities to express their views on the performance of external auditors and audit committee members.

Researchers and practitioners recognise the importance of board dynamics, and the social interactions necessary for effective boards and audit committees. There is always an element of healthy tension in the relationship between executives and audit committees.

Where executives perceive audit committees positively, they can be powerful supports to executives in achieving corporate compliance across their organisation. Executives can use audit committees in a manner which would potentially assist them in achieving higher levels of compliance.

Concluding comment

A better understanding of the practice of corporate governance (i.e., (i) corporate governance best practices, (ii) practitioners, and (iii) praxis) is necessary for effective corporate governance.

We argue that a holistic view of the practice of corporate governance is required, incorporating the status quo practices that underpin the practice of corporate governance, while recognising that effective corporate governance “in practice” is fluid, context-specific and depends on practitioners’ skills, initiative and adaptation.

We agree with Sir Winfried Bischoff when he suggested that the next review of the current UK Corporate Governance Code should retain its current flexibility…

Thus, we agree with Sir Winfried Bischoff, chairman of the FRC, when he suggested that the next review of the current UK Corporate Governance Code should retain its current flexibility and not involve throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Best practice (e.g., the UK Corporate Governance Code) serves as a reference point for “the practice of corporate governance” which concerns what practitioners do (i.e., the praxis). Thus, as suggested by the FRC, “actual behaviour … is far more significant than a hundred statements” about what practitioners should do.

Further reading

Brennan, N.M. and Kirwan, C.E. (2017): “Implementing Corporate Governance: Practices, Practitioners, Praxis”, Accountancy Ireland, 49 (2): 76–77.

Financial Reporting Council (2016): Corporate Culture and the Role of Boards: Report of Observations.

Financial Reporting Council (2013): Lab Project Report: Reporting of Audit Committees.

Figures, 1, 2 and 3 are taken from Brennan, N.M. and Kirwan, C.E. (2015): “Audit Committees: Practices, Practitioners and Praxis of Governance”, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28 (4): 466–493.

Sir Winfried Bischoff, chairman of the FRC, speech on The Future of Governance, 16 February 2017.

Professor Niamh Brennan is the Michael MacCormac professor of management at University College Dublin.

Dr Collette Kirwan is a lecturer in accounting at Waterford Institute of Technology.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Audit committee chairs 'are confusing quality of audit and quality of service'
    February 2, 2022
    Calculator on top of business report

    FRC report also warns that audit committee chairs have a "negative perception of joint audits", despite this being a key reform proposal.

  • Battle of the boards: risk, ESG and two-tier board structures
    April 22, 2022
    Board risk meeting

    There is an inherent conflict of interest between main and executive boards, with two different time horizons and two different risk impacts.

  • Top stories of 2021: purpose and transformation amid the pandemic
    December 22, 2021
    Coloured lines unite to form red arrow

    Philosophical questions about corporate purpose and transformation joined ESG, diversity and AI as the thought-provoking themes of 2021.

  • Jan du Plessis gives first insights into FRC governance and audit reform
    January 27, 2022
    BT chair Jan du Plessis

    The prospective FRC chair acknowledged that the watchdog's own governance needs reform, and that audit scandals have damaged its reputation.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

audit, Audit committees, corporate governance, Financial Reporting Council, praxis, Sir Win Bischoff, UK Corporate Governance Code

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Could ChatGPT technology join the board?
  • Larry Fink puts focus on finance and inflation
  • Call for FTSE 100 companies to give guidance on ethics
  • ESG resilience requires leaders to manage without certainty
  • News round-up: this week in governance

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|