Risk: Why boards need a collective mindset
Handling risk should not be viewed as the domain of a boardroom “expert” but as an area for collective decision-making, where everyone recognises there is no such thing as certainty.
Image: Shutterstock
Executive boards have a responsibility for good governance and responsible stewardship, yet persist in treating risk as a control function, not a decision-making process.
A board is required to take collective responsibility for the organisation’s risk appetite, yet in most board meetings risk is treated as the privileged domain of the head of risk, or chair of the risk and audit committee. Other directors defer to this person as a risk “expert”.
Consequently ri
For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda
Related Stories
-
Workers unwilling to blow the whistle
Worker are not willing to raise concerns about misconduct according to research from the Institute of Business Ethics (IBE).
-
Audit firm KPMG cleared over HBOS audit after 2007 financial crisis
Investigation into audit of HBOS by Big Four audit firm KPMG is closed after regulator finds KPMG's work "did not fall significantly short" of expected standards.
-
How the Google walkout was no ordinary employee protest
Google staff staged a walkout in their thousands over the handling of sexual misconduct cases, possibly one of the first such actions where highly paid workers protested over company values.
