Skip to content

27 June, 2022

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categoriess

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Man presses plus sign

      News round-up: this week in governance

      Row over pay for non-execs; JD Sports governance overhaul; EU agrees on CSRD; and do...

    • Board members discussing ESG Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG

      Experts say pressure to act on ESG is coming from regulators, investors and a new...

    • A group of diverse job candidates Diversity business case arguments may deter job candidates

      Performance-based and fairness-based arguments confirm that social identities "are a lens through which contributions will...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Whistleblower in a crowd

      5 reasons for boards to implement a whistleblowing solution

      The right policy and reporting channel for whistleblowing increases awareness and offers protection. But the...

    • White-collar criminal in jail

      Into the mind of white-collar criminals

      It is estimated that high-level fraud costs the global economy over US$5trn every year. What...

    • notebook on boardroom table

      5 topics to improve the effectiveness of your board

      How many board meetings result in real progress for your company? Make sure these discussion...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • Why risk perception is vital

      It is easy to see the tragic situation unfolding in Ukraine in terms of a...

    • Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer Why emotional intelligence is essential for successful leadership

      Cold logic is not a vote winner for politicians or board members. Sir Keir Starmer...

    • Businessman in thinker pose What’s a company for? Milton Friedman responds

      The ongoing lively debate about corporate purpose has caused me to reflect further on the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Empty boardroom Many executives ‘fail to understand the role and value of boards’

      A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from...

    • Businessman looking at stormy sky Disaster or disruption? Crisis management requires clear definitions

      Identifying and categorising crises, and developing a methodology to deal with them, can help boards...

    • Sir Donald Brydon Sir Donald Brydon on audit reform, career NEDs and board relationships

      While bemoaning the "glacial" pace of audit reform, he hails the pandemic's transformation of communication...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • A group of diverse job candidates Diversity business case arguments may deter job candidates

      Performance-based and fairness-based arguments confirm that social identities "are a lens through which contributions will...

    • Directors waiting for an interview Gender diversity warning for FTSE All-Share Index

      Report from Women on Boards and Protiviti reveals half of FTSE All Share companies outside...

    • A group of directors in a boardroom Women take 54% of FTSE 350 board roles but fail to win ‘top jobs’

      Just 19% of chair, chief executive, chief financial officer or senior independent director roles went...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

      This guide aims to provide directors and their colleagues with advice on how to ensure...

    • Board Duties in Ensuring Company Engagement with Affected Stakeholders

      This guidance note gives a brief overview of the role of corporate boards of directors...

    • C-Suite Barometer 2021

      At the end of 2021, Mazars surveyed over 1,000 executives around the world for its...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology
  • Magazine
      • View All
      • Sustainability Works
      • Tomorrow's Leaders
      • Renumeration Tightrope
      • Governance Ascendance
      • Sense In Sustainability
      • Invisible Enemies

Weighing up the new standard on anti-bribery

by Mazars Mazars SPONSORED

The new ISO anti-bribery tool is well timed, says Howard Shaw, Mazars’ head of anti-corruption and whistleblowing in the UK.

Bribery

Image: Shutterstock

Bribery
Image: Shutterstock

Global free trade may still have its critics in 2016 but one of its undeniable benefits has been the viral spread of action to combat bribery around the world. In particular, the growing threat of legal sanctions for bribery has had a ripple effect throughout global supply chains, forcing companies with a higher bribery risk to tighten their controls.

Against this backdrop, the new international anti-bribery standard, ISO 37001, is certainly well timed and supporters argue that it fulfils a need.

“While there is a plethora of guidance on how to manage bribery risk, of varying qualities, there has been no single benchmarking standard that is internationally recognised,” says Howard Shaw, head of anti-corruption and whistleblowing services at Mazars in the UK.

On the other hand, critics are unconvinced that the new standard will drive improvements in anti-bribery risk management, given the potential for variations in its implementation and certification.

One thing is certain, however—board directors have a crucial role to play in ensuring that bribery risk is monitored and minimised. Companies that regard the new standard as a box-ticking exercise leave themselves exposed to the increasing risk of criminal sanctions.

The case for a standard

After a three-year process of international consultation and drafting meetings, IS0 37001 was published by the International Standards Organisation (ISO) on 15 October 2016.

“The point of a standard is that it should be able to be used by any company, anywhere, irrespective of local legal requirement,” says Shaw, who was involved in shaping the standard as head of the UK delegation to the ISO. “That can lead to a race to the bottom but the surprise outcome in the case of ISO 37001 is that the benchmark has been raised above many of the existing guidance documents.”

The final version was voted on by representatives from 37 participating countries, and had many supporters in countries that have traditionally had a higher incidence of corruption.

Sign of quality

If there was one factor that convinced the ISO of the need for a new anti-bribery standard it was the widespread take-up of the British Standard,BS 10500, after its introduction in 2011.

UK companies increasingly saw the benefit of the British Standard as a source of evidence for the quality of their anti-bribery procedures—a key defence in the event of a UK Bribery Act prosecution. They were not alone. With anti-bribery legislation in the pipeline in other countries, many non-UK companies also adopted BS 10500.

“There is an expectation and almost a de facto requirement for companies involved in multinational trade to specifically manage bribery risk.”

–Howard Shaw, Mazars

“For example, the OECD Anti-Corruption Convention is one of the prime instruments aimed at criminalising bribery, and captures 41 signatory countries that represent more than 60% of global trade”, says Shaw.

Many of the signatory countries to the OECD Convention are adopting similar legislation to the UK’s Bribery Act 2010. “As a result, there is an expectation and almost a de facto requirement for companies involved in multinational trade to specifically manage bribery risk,” says Shaw.

What’s new?

ISO 37001 has much in common with the British Standard but goes a step further by adding more specific detail about requirements as well as more guidance. For example, it sets out in detail what an anti-bribery training programme should look like and what’s required of an internal audit. These aspects are not explored in detail in the British Standard. “Its strength is that it draws together good practice from a wide range of international sources and codifies it within a single document,” says Shaw.

Reaching agreement on some aspects was legally challenging, according to Shaw. One complex area concerned whistleblowing and the right for people to raise concerns and be protected. This was challenging because of the various data-protection regimes around the world—for example, in many countries, anonymous reporting is either not encouraged or is illegal.

Certification

One of the complaints about ISO 37001 is that there is no quality control when it comes to third-party certification. With no governing body or standardisation of certifying regimes, variations in quality are inevitable. Despite these weaknesses, Shaw rejects the argument that ISO 37001 is just a mechanism for third parties to earn money through certification. “It is a genuine attempt to codify global best practice and raise the bar in international business for the right reasons,” he says.

As an alternative to using a third party, companies can also opt for self-certification or peer certification, which can take place across divisions within a multinational. “If the model is robust then self-certification is as good as independent certification,” says Shaw. However, it is worth remembering that no model is fail-safe. “Certification is just a snapshot of a company’s anti-bribery programme at any given time. It’s like a car MOT: it doesn’t provide any guarantees,” says Shaw.

What boards need to do

The first step is for boards to ensure that they assess bribery risk within the broader context of the organisation’s strategic goals and its enterprise risk management (ERM) model. How might bribery risk affect the achievement of its goals?

Often when companies start to ask these questions they find they have to improve the way the ERM model functions, says Shaw. The weak link is often the quality of a company’s overall risk-assessment processes. “The whole anti-bribery programme hangs off the risk-assessment process, and should be an integral part of ERM. If bribery risk is not assessed properly then the anti-bribery programme will not be comprehensive,” he says.

Over the longer term, anti-bribery measures will become a standardised element of corporate risk management and a cornerstone of international trade.

Many companies are also spending a lot of time designing ways to proactively manage organisational culture. This helps to reduce the risk of people acting dishonestly within the organisation and can support a statutory defence in the event of a bribery prosecution.

Although ISO 37001 does not set up requirements to manage culture, it is clearly a critical risk-management issue. “We all know that people can act outside of a company’s policies but within the culture of the organisation,” says Shaw.

In the short-term, boards need to familiarise themselves with the growing requirements to manage bribery risk. Over the longer term, anti-bribery measures will become a standardised element of corporate risk management and a cornerstone of international trade.

This article has been prepared in collaboration with Mazars, a supporter of Board Agenda.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • ISO publishes new anti-bribery tool
    October 15, 2016
    Bribery

    International standard-setting body publishes a new business tool designed to fight bribery.

  • The Exeter appoints new NED
    November 9, 2016
    The Exeter

    Helen McEwan has joined the insurer as a non-executive director.

  • New Zealand announces new anti-money laundering initiatives
    July 7, 2017
    The Beehive Building – Parliament of NZ, Wellington

    New Zealand's government is cracking down on anti-money laundering, with the aim of shutting down the financing of terrorism across Asia and targeting dodgy bank boards.

  • Activism on the rise
    September 7, 2015

    Statistics reveal hedge fund shareholders are more active outside the US.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

anti-bribery, anti-corruption, Bribery, British Standards, corporate governance, ISO 37001, mazars, whistleblowing

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us


 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Stakeholder pressure increases urgency on ESG
  • IoD calls for voluntary code of conduct for board directors
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • 5 reasons for boards to implement a whistleblowing solution
  • Why risk perception is vital

 


 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Board Transformation 2021: Leadership in Transition

There can be little doubt that the global Covid-19...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
EQ 2021 AGM Season report

2021 AGM Season: Successful AGMs in the Pandemic and Beyond

With the impacts of Covid-19 hitting just as the s...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI 2021

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

Global Business Complexity Index 2021

The Global Business Complexity Index 2021 provides...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|