Skip to content

8 August, 2026

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board expertise
      • Finance
      • Technology
    • leadership crisis

      How to fix the leadership crisis

      Unpopular opinion? It’s time for organisations to shift away from feelings to focus on competency...

      AI behaviour

      How do you measure AI adoption?

      It’s easy to produce metrics on AI software deployment, but these are pointless without tracking...

      prestigious board

      The hidden risk of prestigious boards

      High-profile directors bring experience, influence and credibility—but may lead to challenge being reduced and governance...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • leadership crisis

      How to fix the leadership crisis

      Unpopular opinion? It’s time for organisations to shift away from feelings to focus on competency...

      AI behaviour

      How do you measure AI adoption?

      It’s easy to produce metrics on AI software deployment, but these are pointless without tracking...

      risk management

      Why risk management requires good judgement

      Relying on probability models and mitigation plans is not enough—boards need to focus on making...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • governance

      How better governance helps private companies grow

      If governance is to become mature, management decision-making has no place on the board’s agenda,...

      future-ready

      Is your board ‘future-ready’?

      The survival of a business in uncertain times depends on its ability to pivot as...

      investor confidence

      Lack of audit reform ‘will hit investor confidence’

      Government's failure to push ahead with audit reform is a risk to UK investments, the...

  • Board Careers
      • View All
    • female ceos

      FTSE 100 CEO appointments rise

      The number of CEO appointments has doubled in six months, although the global picture suggests...

      board role

      How to engage with outreach

      When board opportunities knock, should you answer the door? Here are tips from a new...

      growth

      Governance Guide: How boards drive growth

      The strategic role of the board is changing rapidly, in line with a shifting world....

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • FRC Annual Review of Audit Quality 2026

      This Financial Reporting Council report uses findings from its supervisory activities to assess audit quality...

      Governance Guide: How Boards Drive Growth

      This Board Agenda Governance Guide investigates how directors can evolve to drive performance and growth...

      Organizational Transformation in the Age of AI

      This World Economic Forum paper looks at how organisations must re-architect their workflows and operating...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

FRC holds fund managers to account under Stewardship Code

by Katherine Blackler on November 14, 2016

Financial regulator catagorises signatories to the Stewardship Code, as it praises much improved reporting against the Code and greater transparency in the UK market.

Stephen Haddrill, FRC

CEO Stephen Haddrill. Photo: FRC

Favorite
Stephen Haddrill, FRC
Stephen Haddrill. Photo: FRC

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has categorised signatories to the Stewardship Code into tiers based on the quality of their Code statements.

According to the FRC, the assessment demonstrates much improved reporting against the Code and greater transparency in the UK market.

There are nearly 300 signatories to the Code, with 120 in Tier 1, an increase from approximately 40 at the beginning of the exercise. This represents nearly 90% of assets under management of members of the Investment Association.

The assessments focused on the quality of descriptions of signatories’ approach to stewardship and their explanations in accordance with the “comply or explain” basis of the Code. More than 200 signatories approached the FRC to discuss improving their reporting against the Code.

Asset managers who have not achieved at least Tier 2 status after six months will be removed from the list of signatories, as their reporting does not demonstrate commitment to the objectives of the Code. The FRC welcomes contact from signatories, particularly those in Tier 3, to discuss improvements to reporting.

Signatories to the Code have been tiered according to the quality of the reporting in their statements based on the seven principles of the Code and the supporting guidance. Asset managers have been categorised in three tiers, and other signatories in two tiers.

Tier 1
Signatories provide a good quality and transparent description of their approach to stewardship and explanations of an alternative approach where necessary.

Tier 2
Signatories meet many of the reporting expectations but report less transparently on their approach to stewardship, or do not provide explanations where they depart from provisions of the Code.

Tier 3
Significant reporting improvements need to be made to ensure the approach is more transparent. Signatories have not engaged with the process of improving their statements and their statements continue to be generic and provide no, or poor, explanations where they depart from provisions of the Code.

Stephen Haddrill, CEO of the FRC said: “Constructive engagement between investors and companies is vital for the long-term success of our economy. Investors play a crucial role in encouraging companies to think more about their long-term strategy. Reporting against the Stewardship Code is not a box-ticking exercise and signatories were encouraged to provide a clear description of their approach to stewardship, with explanations for non-compliance where appropriate. We will be looking for continuous improvement from Code signatories, but we are pleased with the response to this exercise and many signatories have reaffirmed their commitment to quality, transparent reporting and to stewardship”.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    July 7, 2022
    climate reporting proposals response

    Tax transparency; huge response to climate reporting proposals; corporate influence on regulations; EU human rights due diligence directive.

  • FRC publishes 2022 review of stewardship reporting
    September 8, 2022
    risk resilience

    The review reveals that signatories have doubled since 2021 and the quality of reporting has improved in many areas, including engagement.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    September 2, 2022
    Piles of coins with plants in ascending order

    Watchdogs offer guidance on better ESG information; Biblical investor renounces ESG; activist investors close London office.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    January 12, 2024
    ESG fund launches

    ESG fund launches tail off drastically in 2023; Financial Reporting Council fines firms £33.2m; CEOs should be the 'voice of reason'.

Search


Follow Us

Most Popular

Featured Resources

The Future of FTSE 350 Chairs: Pathways, Pipelines & Barriers 2026

This report is a collaboration between the FTSE Women Leaders Review and Professor...

Agentic AI from principles to practice 

‘A C-suite guide to capturing value without losing control’, this Forvis Mazars...

Route to the Top: Europe 2026 

This survey report from Heidrick & Struggles finds that companies are tending...
board's role in a rewired world fgs 2026 cover

A hard job getting harder: The board's role in a rewired world

The role of a corporate director is demanding intellectually, ethically and strategically—and...

Boardroom resilience: Practical governance for risk, readiness and rapid response

Boards are operating in a world defined by uncertainty. Geopolitical tensions, climate...

Board Value Index Summer 2026

Board Intelligence found 86% of directors say rigid processes and inconsistent frameworks...

Governance Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Governance Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Stay current with a wide-ranging source of governance news and intelligence and apply the latest thinking to your boardroom challenges. Subscribe


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies

Copyright © 2026 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy