Skip to content

23 April, 2026

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board expertise
      • Finance
      • Technology
    • AI agents

      The AI risk faced by every board right now

      Even if no one in the organisation planned their arrival, AI agents are already present...

      sustainability litigation

      Is your board at risk of sustainability litigation?

      ESG disclosures, until recently focused on reputational risk and stakeholder expectations, are now becoming legal...

      sustainability Asia

      Navigating sustainability in Asia

      Boards operating across regions need to leave aside assumptions and consider the impact of a...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • AI agents

      The AI risk faced by every board right now

      Even if no one in the organisation planned their arrival, AI agents are already present...

      sustainability litigation

      Is your board at risk of sustainability litigation?

      ESG disclosures, until recently focused on reputational risk and stakeholder expectations, are now becoming legal...

      investor confidence

      Lack of audit reform ‘will hit investor confidence’

      Government's failure to push ahead with audit reform is a risk to UK investments, the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • future-ready

      Is your board ‘future-ready’?

      The survival of a business in uncertain times depends on its ability to pivot as...

      investor confidence

      Lack of audit reform ‘will hit investor confidence’

      Government's failure to push ahead with audit reform is a risk to UK investments, the...

      stewarding AI

      AI is a ‘special case for governance’

      As AI use in the boardroom grows, it’s essential to focus on the ethical and...

  • Board Careers
      • View All
    • female CEO

      Number of women in leadership stays unchanged

      In 2021, there were only eight female CEOs in the FTSE 100—a figure that is...

      female NED

      UK female non-executives earn £73k less than male NEDs

      Although the UK’s average gender pay gap on boards is shrinking, it is still one...

      directors duties

      3 top tips on directors’ duties

      When directors fall short of their responsibilities, the consequences can be devastating. How can board...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • FRC audit approach cover march 2026

      An evolved audit supervision approach 2026

      The Financial Reporting Council outlines its revised approach to audit supervision, which focuses on firms’...

      Protiviti 2026 governance AI

      The Board’s AI Moment, 2026

      This report, from Protiviti’s 2026 Global Board Governance Survey results, focuses on artificial intelligence.

      HEIDRICK GOVERNANCE 2026

      Governing Under High Uncertainty: Opportunities for Emerging-Market Boards

      This report from Boston Consulting Group, Heidrick & Struggles and INSEAD examines how boards are...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

FRC holds fund managers to account under Stewardship Code

by Katherine Blackler on November 14, 2016

Financial regulator catagorises signatories to the Stewardship Code, as it praises much improved reporting against the Code and greater transparency in the UK market.

Stephen Haddrill, FRC

CEO Stephen Haddrill. Photo: FRC

Favorite
Stephen Haddrill, FRC
Stephen Haddrill. Photo: FRC

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) has categorised signatories to the Stewardship Code into tiers based on the quality of their Code statements.

According to the FRC, the assessment demonstrates much improved reporting against the Code and greater transparency in the UK market.

There are nearly 300 signatories to the Code, with 120 in Tier 1, an increase from approximately 40 at the beginning of the exercise. This represents nearly 90% of assets under management of members of the Investment Association.

The assessments focused on the quality of descriptions of signatories’ approach to stewardship and their explanations in accordance with the “comply or explain” basis of the Code. More than 200 signatories approached the FRC to discuss improving their reporting against the Code.

Asset managers who have not achieved at least Tier 2 status after six months will be removed from the list of signatories, as their reporting does not demonstrate commitment to the objectives of the Code. The FRC welcomes contact from signatories, particularly those in Tier 3, to discuss improvements to reporting.

Signatories to the Code have been tiered according to the quality of the reporting in their statements based on the seven principles of the Code and the supporting guidance. Asset managers have been categorised in three tiers, and other signatories in two tiers.

Tier 1
Signatories provide a good quality and transparent description of their approach to stewardship and explanations of an alternative approach where necessary.

Tier 2
Signatories meet many of the reporting expectations but report less transparently on their approach to stewardship, or do not provide explanations where they depart from provisions of the Code.

Tier 3
Significant reporting improvements need to be made to ensure the approach is more transparent. Signatories have not engaged with the process of improving their statements and their statements continue to be generic and provide no, or poor, explanations where they depart from provisions of the Code.

Stephen Haddrill, CEO of the FRC said: “Constructive engagement between investors and companies is vital for the long-term success of our economy. Investors play a crucial role in encouraging companies to think more about their long-term strategy. Reporting against the Stewardship Code is not a box-ticking exercise and signatories were encouraged to provide a clear description of their approach to stewardship, with explanations for non-compliance where appropriate. We will be looking for continuous improvement from Code signatories, but we are pleased with the response to this exercise and many signatories have reaffirmed their commitment to quality, transparent reporting and to stewardship”.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    July 7, 2022
    climate reporting proposals response

    Tax transparency; huge response to climate reporting proposals; corporate influence on regulations; EU human rights due diligence directive.

  • FRC publishes 2022 review of stewardship reporting
    September 8, 2022
    risk resilience

    The review reveals that signatories have doubled since 2021 and the quality of reporting has improved in many areas, including engagement.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    September 2, 2022
    Piles of coins with plants in ascending order

    Watchdogs offer guidance on better ESG information; Biblical investor renounces ESG; activist investors close London office.

  • News round-up: this week in governance
    January 12, 2024
    ESG fund launches

    ESG fund launches tail off drastically in 2023; Financial Reporting Council fines firms £33.2m; CEOs should be the 'voice of reason'.

Search


Follow Us

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 - UK insights

Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

SUBSCRIBE TODAY

Stay current with a wide-ranging source of governance news and intelligence and apply the latest thinking to your boardroom challenges. Subscribe


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies

Copyright © 2026 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy