Skip to content

28 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • stakeholder governance

      Threat to stakeholder governance from Twitter sale ‘overstated’

      Academics and experts argue stakeholder governance will always come second while the law puts the...

    • Davos resilience News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

    • audit reform UK Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’

      The Financial Reporting Council still awaits the proposed new statutory powers that would allow it...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

How conflict makes for effective boards

by Eelke Heemskerk

Harmonious boards may not be the most effective. Eelke Heemskerk explores why the right kind of conflict can improve your board performance.

Right kind of bust-up. Photo: Shutterstock

What makes a board effective? A growing body of academic literature now agrees that it is only in part about the rules or regulations, and mostly about how board members work together.

In this growing literature of behavioural corporate governance, many assume the importance of social cohesion and harmony for board performance. While this sounds valid, recent research I conducted with my co-authors shows that avoiding conflict paradoxically hinders good governance.

We must take caution and not overstate the importance of social cohesion for board performance.

Constructive conflict

Conflict is typically considered to have a negative influence on group performance: it decreases the satisfaction of group members; it decreases group productivity; and it hinders the exchange of information needed for effective decision-making.

However, there is a growing awareness that under certain conditions, conflict can also be constructive.

Conflict comes in different guises. We are most familiar with relationship conflict. This arises through interpersonal incompatibilities between group members and is expressed in tension, animosity and annoyance. This type of conflict is detrimental to effective group performance.

But there is also task conflict, which arises from disagreement between group members about the content of the tasks to be performed due to differences in viewpoints, ideas and opinions.

Task conflicts are positively correlated with effective decision-making, especially in the context of boards that are involved in non-routine decision-making…

Task conflicts are positively correlated with effective decision-making, especially in the context of boards that are involved in non-routine decision-making at the apex of organisational hierarchy.

We were interested in the role of conflict in boardroom dynamics and therefore engaged in a comparative participatory study of boards in action. We came up with some counterintuitive results.

Harmony or apathy?

Board members are typically well aware that relationship conflict is not good for board performance. As a consequence, they strive for social cohesion and try to steer clear of conflict.

But striving for low levels of conflict paradoxically hinders board task performance, because not only does it reduce malign relational conflict, but constructive task conflict as well.

While relationship conflicts are harmful, avoiding conflict at all may be even worse. Conflict avoidance inhibits the decision-making performance of a board because it encourages the suppression of differences and either fast, unreflective decisions or indecisiveness.

It can also lead to procrastination when directors keep searching for information to assess alternatives under consideration. In short, the absence of conflict is not harmony—it’s apathy.

Dissent and suspicion

What are the conditions that help to foster constructive task conflict but reduce relational conflict? Our research suggests that a common framework—that is, a shared understanding among board members of their role—is a crucial ingredient.

Boards differ in how engaged they are in influencing management decisions and their companies’ directions. In the absence of an established common framework, considerable differences may exist between board members about what the board’s tasks actually are.

Ambiguity or even disagreement can lead to relational conflict. A common framework, however, allows for task conflict and at the same time reduces relationship conflict.

From previous research we know that personality traits such as opinion conformity and a tendency to use flattery are “beneficial” to individual board members…

While a common framework can lead to benefits by promoting task conflict, our research also shows that effective chairperson leadership is a prerequisite for such benefits.

A common framework requires leadership from the chair to get the board to debate about, and agree on, their desired role. Board leadership by the chairperson is a driving force in enabling open and critical debate within a board.

Of course, the personalities of board members are likely to influence conflict avoidance as well.

Some people are simply more conflict-avoiding than others. And from previous research we know that personality traits such as opinion conformity and a tendency to use flattery are “beneficial” to individual board members, because it increases the chances of board appointments.

The tendency to appoint and retain conforming, non-critical board members with similar views—even when they are demographically different—can be seen as an important driver for conflict avoidance.

The absence of conflict reflects blind trust rather than a good professional relationship. Likewise, professional tensions between the executives and non-executives are signs of a well-performing board. We should habitually become suspicious when we observe boards where dissent is absent.

Eelke M. Heemskerk is associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam, and boardroom consultant at the Galan Group. He publishes on corporate governance, executive decision-making, and global networks of corporate control.

Reference
Heemskerk, E.M., M. Wats and K.Th. Heemskerk (2016; Early Access). “Conflict in the Boardroom: A Participant Observation Study of Non-Executive Board Dynamics” in Journal of Management and Governance. doi:10.1007/s10997-015-9339-8.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Rethinking boards: what does the future hold for directors?
    February 28, 2022
    A futuristic boardroom

    As companies increase in complexity, directors may struggle to add impact and value. Here are five potential areas for board reform.

  • The storm before the calm: how boards can make better decisions
    October 18, 2021
    Businessman looking at stormy sky

    Behind every apparently calm surface lies a mass of board member interests, beliefs and emotions. How these conflicts can be managed?

  • Amazon shareholders call for tax transparency
    March 7, 2022
    Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon

    Investors want Amazon to use the Global Reporting Initiative’s Tax Standard to disclose its tax arrangements.

  • How to be an effective chair during volatile times
    July 18, 2022

    Now, more than ever, boards need to be on top of their game to make the right decisions and drive growth—effective chairing is the key.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

board expertise, boardroom behaviour, conflict, effective boards, Spring 2017

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’
  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
  • Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis
  • Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|