Skip to content

7 December, 2023

Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • workers on boards

      ‘Workers on boards’ idea is back on the table

      European-style two-tier board system may help to end stagnation in the UK, reports the Resolution...

    • AI catastrophe Avoiding AI catastrophe is ‘beyond corporate governance’

      It is ‘inevitable’ that the risks from artificial intelligence require public governance, according to a...

    • sustainability Where next for sustainability?

      An expert panel discussed their view of global trends for the business world in Board...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • AI priorities

      AI priorities for the board

      To reap the benefits of artificial intelligence, boards will need to work on their organisational...

    • purpose statement

      On purpose: crafting an authentic statement

      Purpose statements define how organisations align purpose and people. Here’s how to make a statement...

    • first-time CFO

      How to succeed as a first-time CFO

      The remit and responsibilities of the chief financial officer have changed, which can seem daunting...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • uk corporate governance

      Why UK corporate governance needs tightening up

      The LSE’s response to the government’s panicky U-turn on governance regulation is not helpful to...

    • faith in the UK Audit reform is essential to restore faith in the UK

      When it comes to understanding what attracts investors to a capital market, the London Stock...

    • U-turn on audit reform An uncomfortable U-turn on audit reform

      The government’s bonfire of the regulations expected for audit reform creates a source of uncertainty...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • sustainability Where next for sustainability?

      An expert panel discussed their view of global trends for the business world in Board...

    • reporting elements Boards urged to retain ‘beneficial’ reporting elements

      Although the government cancelled the requirement, resilience disclosures ‘cannot be wasted effort’, says senior auditco...

    • energy transition Collaboration is key to UK energy transition

      Communication, innovation and engagement are needed for the move to net zero, an expert panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • gender diversity study Academics criticise BlackRock gender diversity research

      Its methodology came under fire, with some critics also pointing out it was wrong to...

    • diversity of thought How to boost diversity of thought

      Companies benefit from diverse workforces, but also from having the input of different opinions and...

    • minority NED Number of minority NEDs drops

      Although there is some progress in diversity in other board roles, research suggests that boards...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Risk Map: Top Risks 2024

      Control Risks' Top Risks for 2024 cut across the geopolitical, security, operational, regulatory, and cyber/digital...

    • A Director’s Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations 2023

      An internal investigation must be handled meticulously to avoid legal exposure, regulatory or criminal prosecution...

    • Spencer Stuart UK Board Index Highlights 2023 cover

      Spencer Stuart UK Board Index Highlights 2023

      The 2023 UK Spencer Stuart Board Index is a review of board composition and governance...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

How conflict makes for effective boards

by Eelke Heemskerk

Harmonious boards may not be the most effective. Eelke Heemskerk explores why the right kind of conflict can improve your board performance.

Right kind of bust-up. Photo: Shutterstock

What makes a board effective? A growing body of academic literature now agrees that it is only in part about the rules or regulations, and mostly about how board members work together.

In this growing literature of behavioural corporate governance, many assume the importance of social cohesion and harmony for board performance. While this sounds valid, recent research I conducted with my co-authors shows that avoiding conflict paradoxically hinders good governance.

We must take caution and not overstate the importance of social cohesion for board performance.

Constructive conflict

Conflict is typically considered to have a negative influence on group performance: it decreases the satisfaction of group members; it decreases group productivity; and it hinders the exchange of information needed for effective decision-making.

However, there is a growing awareness that under certain conditions, conflict can also be constructive.

Conflict comes in different guises. We are most familiar with relationship conflict. This arises through interpersonal incompatibilities between group members and is expressed in tension, animosity and annoyance. This type of conflict is detrimental to effective group performance.

But there is also task conflict, which arises from disagreement between group members about the content of the tasks to be performed due to differences in viewpoints, ideas and opinions.

Task conflicts are positively correlated with effective decision-making, especially in the context of boards that are involved in non-routine decision-making…

Task conflicts are positively correlated with effective decision-making, especially in the context of boards that are involved in non-routine decision-making at the apex of organisational hierarchy.

We were interested in the role of conflict in boardroom dynamics and therefore engaged in a comparative participatory study of boards in action. We came up with some counterintuitive results.

Harmony or apathy?

Board members are typically well aware that relationship conflict is not good for board performance. As a consequence, they strive for social cohesion and try to steer clear of conflict.

But striving for low levels of conflict paradoxically hinders board task performance, because not only does it reduce malign relational conflict, but constructive task conflict as well.

While relationship conflicts are harmful, avoiding conflict at all may be even worse. Conflict avoidance inhibits the decision-making performance of a board because it encourages the suppression of differences and either fast, unreflective decisions or indecisiveness.

It can also lead to procrastination when directors keep searching for information to assess alternatives under consideration. In short, the absence of conflict is not harmony—it’s apathy.

Dissent and suspicion

What are the conditions that help to foster constructive task conflict but reduce relational conflict? Our research suggests that a common framework—that is, a shared understanding among board members of their role—is a crucial ingredient.

Boards differ in how engaged they are in influencing management decisions and their companies’ directions. In the absence of an established common framework, considerable differences may exist between board members about what the board’s tasks actually are.

Ambiguity or even disagreement can lead to relational conflict. A common framework, however, allows for task conflict and at the same time reduces relationship conflict.

From previous research we know that personality traits such as opinion conformity and a tendency to use flattery are “beneficial” to individual board members…

While a common framework can lead to benefits by promoting task conflict, our research also shows that effective chairperson leadership is a prerequisite for such benefits.

A common framework requires leadership from the chair to get the board to debate about, and agree on, their desired role. Board leadership by the chairperson is a driving force in enabling open and critical debate within a board.

Of course, the personalities of board members are likely to influence conflict avoidance as well.

Some people are simply more conflict-avoiding than others. And from previous research we know that personality traits such as opinion conformity and a tendency to use flattery are “beneficial” to individual board members, because it increases the chances of board appointments.

The tendency to appoint and retain conforming, non-critical board members with similar views—even when they are demographically different—can be seen as an important driver for conflict avoidance.

The absence of conflict reflects blind trust rather than a good professional relationship. Likewise, professional tensions between the executives and non-executives are signs of a well-performing board. We should habitually become suspicious when we observe boards where dissent is absent.

Eelke M. Heemskerk is associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam, and boardroom consultant at the Galan Group. He publishes on corporate governance, executive decision-making, and global networks of corporate control.

Reference
Heemskerk, E.M., M. Wats and K.Th. Heemskerk (2016; Early Access). “Conflict in the Boardroom: A Participant Observation Study of Non-Executive Board Dynamics” in Journal of Management and Governance. doi:10.1007/s10997-015-9339-8.

Related Posts

  • Amazon shareholders call for tax transparency
    March 7, 2022
    Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon

    Investors want Amazon to use the Global Reporting Initiative’s Tax Standard to disclose its tax arrangements.

  • How to be an effective chair during volatile times
    July 18, 2022

    Now, more than ever, boards need to be on top of their game to make the right decisions and drive growth—effective chairing is the key.

  • Rethinking boards: what does the future hold for directors?
    February 28, 2022
    A futuristic boardroom

    As companies increase in complexity, directors may struggle to add impact and value. Here are five potential areas for board reform.

  • The storm before the calm: how boards can make better decisions
    October 18, 2021
    Businessman looking at stormy sky

    Behind every apparently calm surface lies a mass of board member interests, beliefs and emotions. How these conflicts can be managed?

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

board expertise, boardroom behaviour, conflict, effective boards, Spring 2017

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us





Most Popular

  • Sustainability governance is on the rise
  • Why UK corporate governance needs tightening up
  • Proxy adviser warns LSE over governance
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • How to future-proof your board

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations 2023

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|

Copyright © 2023 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap