Skip to content

2 June, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • Succession planning

      News round-up: this week in governance

      UK 'less optimistic' on ESG than European boards; holding stock; ethics codes; governance in Japan;...

    • C-suite barometer Leaders are positive about growth despite economic uncertainty

      Sustainability and technology are strategic priorities for boards in 2023, Mazars’ annual barometer of the...

    • EU CSDDD Pressure builds on EU to amend due diligence rules

      More companies have added their voices to the call to make the EU Corporate Sustainability...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • Climate finance

      How climate change alters the financial landscape

      To achieve sustainability, companies and boards will need to look not only to their operations,...

    • generative AI

      Five AI issues to consider right now

      We may not know what AI will mean for us all in the long term,...

    • sexual misconduct

      How to prevent sexual misconduct in your organisation

      Revelations about the CBI may be shocking, but there is no place for complacency and...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • hybrid AGM

      Hybrid AGMs maximise shareholder participation

      Avoid virtual-only annual general meetings: although pragmatic in an emergency, they water down shareholders’ rights.

    • ESG break up ESG: Should E and S break up with G?

      In the world of investing, maturity has revealed significant practical shortcomings in combining environmental, social...

    • controlling shareholders The politics and geopolitics of controlling shareholders

      Shareholders with a controlling interest influence not only financial matters but can also wield great...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • board survey 2023 Board appointments fell sharply in 2022

      Companies appear to be sticking with experienced leaders—to the detriment of progress—suggests FTSE 350 boardroom...

    • diversity statistics Diversity statistics challenged by new scorecard

      Companies can ‘hit the target, but miss the point’, say academics researching a more ‘holistic’...

    • CEO turnover CEO turnover rises steeply

      The researchers say political changes and business difficulties may have accelerated turnover, which has risen...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Mazars c-suite 2023

      Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

      The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses from more than 800 C-suite executives from...

    • CFO Career Survey Report

      Our survey, in December 2022, of almost 200 CFOs across the public, private and non-profit...

    • The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

      The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement highlights the need for greater engagement between companies and...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

How conflict makes for effective boards

by Eelke Heemskerk

Harmonious boards may not be the most effective. Eelke Heemskerk explores why the right kind of conflict can improve your board performance.

Right kind of bust-up. Photo: Shutterstock

What makes a board effective? A growing body of academic literature now agrees that it is only in part about the rules or regulations, and mostly about how board members work together.

In this growing literature of behavioural corporate governance, many assume the importance of social cohesion and harmony for board performance. While this sounds valid, recent research I conducted with my co-authors shows that avoiding conflict paradoxically hinders good governance.

We must take caution and not overstate the importance of social cohesion for board performance.

Constructive conflict

Conflict is typically considered to have a negative influence on group performance: it decreases the satisfaction of group members; it decreases group productivity; and it hinders the exchange of information needed for effective decision-making.

However, there is a growing awareness that under certain conditions, conflict can also be constructive.

Conflict comes in different guises. We are most familiar with relationship conflict. This arises through interpersonal incompatibilities between group members and is expressed in tension, animosity and annoyance. This type of conflict is detrimental to effective group performance.

But there is also task conflict, which arises from disagreement between group members about the content of the tasks to be performed due to differences in viewpoints, ideas and opinions.

Task conflicts are positively correlated with effective decision-making, especially in the context of boards that are involved in non-routine decision-making…

Task conflicts are positively correlated with effective decision-making, especially in the context of boards that are involved in non-routine decision-making at the apex of organisational hierarchy.

We were interested in the role of conflict in boardroom dynamics and therefore engaged in a comparative participatory study of boards in action. We came up with some counterintuitive results.

Harmony or apathy?

Board members are typically well aware that relationship conflict is not good for board performance. As a consequence, they strive for social cohesion and try to steer clear of conflict.

But striving for low levels of conflict paradoxically hinders board task performance, because not only does it reduce malign relational conflict, but constructive task conflict as well.

While relationship conflicts are harmful, avoiding conflict at all may be even worse. Conflict avoidance inhibits the decision-making performance of a board because it encourages the suppression of differences and either fast, unreflective decisions or indecisiveness.

It can also lead to procrastination when directors keep searching for information to assess alternatives under consideration. In short, the absence of conflict is not harmony—it’s apathy.

Dissent and suspicion

What are the conditions that help to foster constructive task conflict but reduce relational conflict? Our research suggests that a common framework—that is, a shared understanding among board members of their role—is a crucial ingredient.

Boards differ in how engaged they are in influencing management decisions and their companies’ directions. In the absence of an established common framework, considerable differences may exist between board members about what the board’s tasks actually are.

Ambiguity or even disagreement can lead to relational conflict. A common framework, however, allows for task conflict and at the same time reduces relationship conflict.

From previous research we know that personality traits such as opinion conformity and a tendency to use flattery are “beneficial” to individual board members…

While a common framework can lead to benefits by promoting task conflict, our research also shows that effective chairperson leadership is a prerequisite for such benefits.

A common framework requires leadership from the chair to get the board to debate about, and agree on, their desired role. Board leadership by the chairperson is a driving force in enabling open and critical debate within a board.

Of course, the personalities of board members are likely to influence conflict avoidance as well.

Some people are simply more conflict-avoiding than others. And from previous research we know that personality traits such as opinion conformity and a tendency to use flattery are “beneficial” to individual board members, because it increases the chances of board appointments.

The tendency to appoint and retain conforming, non-critical board members with similar views—even when they are demographically different—can be seen as an important driver for conflict avoidance.

The absence of conflict reflects blind trust rather than a good professional relationship. Likewise, professional tensions between the executives and non-executives are signs of a well-performing board. We should habitually become suspicious when we observe boards where dissent is absent.

Eelke M. Heemskerk is associate professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Amsterdam, and boardroom consultant at the Galan Group. He publishes on corporate governance, executive decision-making, and global networks of corporate control.

Reference
Heemskerk, E.M., M. Wats and K.Th. Heemskerk (2016; Early Access). “Conflict in the Boardroom: A Participant Observation Study of Non-Executive Board Dynamics” in Journal of Management and Governance. doi:10.1007/s10997-015-9339-8.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Rethinking boards: what does the future hold for directors?
    February 28, 2022
    A futuristic boardroom

    As companies increase in complexity, directors may struggle to add impact and value. Here are five potential areas for board reform.

  • The storm before the calm: how boards can make better decisions
    October 18, 2021
    Businessman looking at stormy sky

    Behind every apparently calm surface lies a mass of board member interests, beliefs and emotions. How these conflicts can be managed?

  • Amazon shareholders call for tax transparency
    March 7, 2022
    Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon

    Investors want Amazon to use the Global Reporting Initiative’s Tax Standard to disclose its tax arrangements.

  • How to be an effective chair during volatile times
    July 18, 2022

    Now, more than ever, boards need to be on top of their game to make the right decisions and drive growth—effective chairing is the key.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

board expertise, boardroom behaviour, conflict, effective boards, Spring 2017

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Corporate governance code review boosts internal controls
  • ESG: Should E and S break up with G?
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Pressure builds on EU to amend due diligence rules
  • Five AI issues to consider right now

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|