Skip to content

11 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Crime in the making

by Simon Airey and Joshua Domb

In May David Cameron announced his intention to introduce a new corporate offence: failing to prevent an economic crime. Simon Airey and Joshua Domb discuss what it means for boards.

Photo: Alan Cleaver, Flickr

Photo: Alan Cleaver, Flickr
Photo: Alan Cleaver, Flickr

David Cameron recently announced plans to consult in relation to a proposed new corporate offence of “failure to prevent economic crime”.

“Economic crime” is likely to include offences such as fraud, theft, false accounting, forgery, destroying company documents, money laundering, handling the proceeds of crime and a range of offences under the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000.

If enacted, the new law would represent a significant expansion of corporate criminal liability in the UK.

At present, a company can only be found liable for fraud and other economic crimes if it can be proved that persons at executive or board level were complicit in the criminality.

Key points

The new offence is likely to resemble section 7 of the UK Bribery Act 2010 by making companies criminally liable for acts of an “associated person”, likely to be defined as anyone who provides services for or on behalf of the company, anywhere in the world.

  • It is expected that the legislation will have broad extra-territorial effect.
  • If the legislation mirrors the Bribery Act, the only defence will be for a company to show that, at the time of the crime, it had in place “adequate procedures” that were designed to prevent such conduct.
  • Companies will need to undertake a detailed risk assessment, design comprehensive policies and procedures and implement a tailored compliance programme. Such a programme will inevitably need to include demonstrable board-level engagement, bespoke training for key management staff and third parties, plus appropriate due diligence and monitoring. The compliance burden will be high and early preparation and planning will be essential.

Establishing such involvement is usually difficult, particularly in large corporations where the chain of knowledge may break long before it reaches senior management or where proof of complicity is hard to establish.

As a result, regulators have frequently struggled to attribute criminal liability to corporate entities.

The proposed offence will likely apply to all companies that conduct business, or part of a business, in the UK (e.g. via a subsidiary, sales operation, a representative office or even as a result of a listing on the London Stock Exchange).

In other words, the law will apply to foreign companies as well as those incorporated in the UK.

David Cameron. Photo: European Union
David Cameron. Photo: European Union

In one way, expanding the law in this way would be a convenient and logical step in the process of making companies more accountable for the criminal acts of those associated with them, and in advancing the compliance agenda generally.

It also chimes with a number of anti-corruption and transparency initiatives being promoted by David Cameron globally, which are undoubtedly intended as legacy achievements for his premiership.

However, an expansion of the law in this way is unlikely to be welcomed by many companies who will view it either as an unnecessary imposition or an unduly, onerous burden, or both—hence the consultation.

What might be seen as a laudable proposal to ensure high standards of business globally, level the playing field internationally and brand the UK as a “go to” destination for compliant companies, needs to be weighed against the downside: substantial costs, notably increased administration and a significant sap upon management at a time when many companies are still struggling with their obligations under the Bribery Act and a raft of regulation generally.

For large companies, liability for the acts of associated persons is likely to include considerable numbers of subsidiaries, employees and agents in numerous jurisdictions, some of whom may be difficult to oversee.

Companies found guilty of an offence are likely to be at risk of unlimited fines, disgorgement and a range of other legal and regulatory sanctions.

Non-executive action 

In light of the current global mood and various associated initiatives in relation to matters such as bribery and corruption, tax evasion, money laundering, transparency, etc, it would not be rash to assume that the proposed new offence will be enacted into law in one form or another.

However, there is no doubt that it will have a profound impact if enacted in the way envisaged.

It may be possible to influence the form and content of the law so that the impact is not disproportionately onerous; companies should therefore respond to the consultation directly or via industry bodies or their professional advisers.

Start planning and asking questions now. Conduct an impact assessment. Is your company equipped to deal with the likely compliance burden?

Seek to identify the risk of economic crime being committed by your “associated persons” by looking at how you do business, where and with whom.

On the assumption that the law will be enacted, your company will need to undertake a detailed risk assessment, design comprehensive policies and procedures and implement a tailored compliance programme which includes appropriate training, due diligence, monitoring and review.

A preliminary review of these issues now is unlikely to be wasted time.

Demonstrate and document board-level engagement. There will be serious legal and reputational consequences for companies (and their boards) where they fall short of the required standards.

Many companies are still struggling to achieve compliance with the Bribery Act. Undertake a gap analysis. If there is still work to be done, take action to review the proper implementation of associated policies and procedures, refresh training and demonstrate board-level engagement and appropriate due diligence.

Take note of the new corporate offence of failing to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion by associated persons, likely to be introduced later this year.

Simon Airey is partner at DLA Piper, where Joshua Domb is an associate.
[email protected]

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • MPs demand jail time for directors who fail to prevent fraud
    October 18, 2022
    directors fraud

    MPs are tabling an amendment to the economic crime and corporate transparency bill to address ‘outdated and ineffective’ liability laws.

  • How to operate during economic uncertainty
    August 2, 2023

    Leveraging internal audit can help boards not only to identify and assess risks but to highlight opportunities in volatile times.

  • FBI warns ransomware gangs are targeting M&A transactions
    November 18, 2021
    ransomware threat

    US crime agency says the hard deadlines involved in M&A transactions pressures victims to pay up for fear of affecting stock values.

  • World Economic Forum issues business guidance on human rights
    May 24, 2022
    World Economic Forum logo

    Launched this week at Davos, the WEF report contains five questions for boards to consider regarding their conduct towards stakeholders.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap