Skip to content

29 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • stakeholder governance

      Threat to stakeholder governance from Twitter sale ‘overstated’

      Academics and experts argue stakeholder governance will always come second while the law puts the...

    • Davos resilience News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

    • audit reform UK Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’

      The Financial Reporting Council still awaits the proposed new statutory powers that would allow it...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Crime in the making

by Simon Airey and Joshua Domb

In May David Cameron announced his intention to introduce a new corporate offence: failing to prevent an economic crime. Simon Airey and Joshua Domb discuss what it means for boards.

Photo: Alan Cleaver, Flickr

Photo: Alan Cleaver, Flickr
Photo: Alan Cleaver, Flickr

David Cameron recently announced plans to consult in relation to a proposed new corporate offence of “failure to prevent economic crime”.

“Economic crime” is likely to include offences such as fraud, theft, false accounting, forgery, destroying company documents, money laundering, handling the proceeds of crime and a range of offences under the Financial Services & Markets Act 2000.

If enacted, the new law would represent a significant expansion of corporate criminal liability in the UK.

At present, a company can only be found liable for fraud and other economic crimes if it can be proved that persons at executive or board level were complicit in the criminality.

Key points

The new offence is likely to resemble section 7 of the UK Bribery Act 2010 by making companies criminally liable for acts of an “associated person”, likely to be defined as anyone who provides services for or on behalf of the company, anywhere in the world.

  • It is expected that the legislation will have broad extra-territorial effect.
  • If the legislation mirrors the Bribery Act, the only defence will be for a company to show that, at the time of the crime, it had in place “adequate procedures” that were designed to prevent such conduct.
  • Companies will need to undertake a detailed risk assessment, design comprehensive policies and procedures and implement a tailored compliance programme. Such a programme will inevitably need to include demonstrable board-level engagement, bespoke training for key management staff and third parties, plus appropriate due diligence and monitoring. The compliance burden will be high and early preparation and planning will be essential.

Establishing such involvement is usually difficult, particularly in large corporations where the chain of knowledge may break long before it reaches senior management or where proof of complicity is hard to establish.

As a result, regulators have frequently struggled to attribute criminal liability to corporate entities.

The proposed offence will likely apply to all companies that conduct business, or part of a business, in the UK (e.g. via a subsidiary, sales operation, a representative office or even as a result of a listing on the London Stock Exchange).

In other words, the law will apply to foreign companies as well as those incorporated in the UK.

David Cameron. Photo: European Union
David Cameron. Photo: European Union

In one way, expanding the law in this way would be a convenient and logical step in the process of making companies more accountable for the criminal acts of those associated with them, and in advancing the compliance agenda generally.

It also chimes with a number of anti-corruption and transparency initiatives being promoted by David Cameron globally, which are undoubtedly intended as legacy achievements for his premiership.

However, an expansion of the law in this way is unlikely to be welcomed by many companies who will view it either as an unnecessary imposition or an unduly, onerous burden, or both—hence the consultation.

What might be seen as a laudable proposal to ensure high standards of business globally, level the playing field internationally and brand the UK as a “go to” destination for compliant companies, needs to be weighed against the downside: substantial costs, notably increased administration and a significant sap upon management at a time when many companies are still struggling with their obligations under the Bribery Act and a raft of regulation generally.

For large companies, liability for the acts of associated persons is likely to include considerable numbers of subsidiaries, employees and agents in numerous jurisdictions, some of whom may be difficult to oversee.

Companies found guilty of an offence are likely to be at risk of unlimited fines, disgorgement and a range of other legal and regulatory sanctions.

Non-executive action 

In light of the current global mood and various associated initiatives in relation to matters such as bribery and corruption, tax evasion, money laundering, transparency, etc, it would not be rash to assume that the proposed new offence will be enacted into law in one form or another.

However, there is no doubt that it will have a profound impact if enacted in the way envisaged.

It may be possible to influence the form and content of the law so that the impact is not disproportionately onerous; companies should therefore respond to the consultation directly or via industry bodies or their professional advisers.

Start planning and asking questions now. Conduct an impact assessment. Is your company equipped to deal with the likely compliance burden?

Seek to identify the risk of economic crime being committed by your “associated persons” by looking at how you do business, where and with whom.

On the assumption that the law will be enacted, your company will need to undertake a detailed risk assessment, design comprehensive policies and procedures and implement a tailored compliance programme which includes appropriate training, due diligence, monitoring and review.

A preliminary review of these issues now is unlikely to be wasted time.

Demonstrate and document board-level engagement. There will be serious legal and reputational consequences for companies (and their boards) where they fall short of the required standards.

Many companies are still struggling to achieve compliance with the Bribery Act. Undertake a gap analysis. If there is still work to be done, take action to review the proper implementation of associated policies and procedures, refresh training and demonstrate board-level engagement and appropriate due diligence.

Take note of the new corporate offence of failing to prevent the facilitation of tax evasion by associated persons, likely to be introduced later this year.

Simon Airey is partner at DLA Piper, where Joshua Domb is an associate.
[email protected]

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • CEOs under fire: the psychology of leaders in a warzone
    March 11, 2022
    Bullet hole in glass in front of Ukrainian flag

    The business world expects bosses to perform under pressure, not under fire. How are corporate leaders in Ukraine dealing with the crisis?

  • Board effectiveness in the new world of work
    April 21, 2022
    Boardroom at sunrise

    Boards should use this post-pandemic period to reflect and reinvent themselves and their working practices.

  • Companies must put equality at the heart of the race to zero
    November 10, 2021
    Trees reflected in buildings

    Singular pursuit of net-zero by 2050 could exacerbate inequality and derail our chances of a climate-resilient future.

  • Ethics in the technology sector remains a headline issue
    January 26, 2022
    Businessman has biometric data scanned

    For a second year running technology is the sector that garnered the most news stories about ethical lapses—with data privacy a key concern.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

economic crime

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’
  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
  • Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis
  • Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|