Skip to content

12 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Taking the initiative

by Gavin Hinks on May 20, 2016

Shareholder interests are not taken seriously and audit committees need to be more proactive in probing company strategy, says the head of the Dutch shareholders’ association.

Paul Koster

Paul Koster
Paul Koster

Paul Koster’s view may be a little discomforting for audit committee members.

Far from the view that audit committees are doing alright, Koster, head of the VEB—the Dutch shareholders’ association—has demanded more from them, setting an agenda for a significantly different kind of audit body.

Koster’s view, in fact, is that audit committees across Europe could be doing more to support and protect shareholder investments.

He hammered his point home earlier this year at the International Corporate Governance Network conference in London, where he declared that audit committees should become a new line of defence for shareholders; they should be able to offer binding advice to boards; and they should be “aggressive” in proactively launching their own internal investigations.

Cultural shift

Speaking more recently to Board Agenda, Koster points out that underlying his belief about audit committees is a view that a cultural shift has taken place in European corporates, in which the shareholder interests are no longer considered as important as they were.

His proposals for audit committees are driven by an urgent need to shore up those interests against what he described as the sometimes “whimsical” approach of corporate management.

Though it was unravelled after he appeared in London, he cites the VW scandal as a case to illustrate his point that managers often aim for the “improbable, the impossible”, and that someone needs to be on hand to challenge it. The error of VW’s management, he says, was to aim for being the number one motor manufacturer in the world with a strategy that involved convincing the US market that diesel engines were much better than they thought—a strategy that left competitors bewildered.

Image: Shutterstock
Image: Shutterstock

Koster’s point is that problematic information to challenge wayward strategies is often already known, and finding it should be a role for the audit committee.

“You need to put your ear to the floor, you need to be aware of things being discussed by people who really deal in making the cars the quality that they are. You may hear things you are not aware of when you stay at a distance. I think the audit committee can play a role by being more prominently and more physically present,” says Koster.

He says audit committee chairmen should also be carefully publishing details of what they will be pro-actively investigating and what they want management to examine.

“I’m not saying the audit committee should be in an executive role, but they should be more focused on taking initiatives on their own to challenge management on their assumptions,” says Koster.

“Why should shareholders not be aware of something that the audit committee is concerned about?”

–Paul Koster, VEB

He adds: “Management clearly has an agenda that might not align with what the shareholders want: management is seeking power, management is seeking respect. But why is it that management should be free of critical comments when shareholders pay the price when things go wrong?” He adds a further rhetorical question: “Why should shareholders not be aware of something that the audit committee is concerned about?”

Much of this thinking is underpinned by two further proposals Koster has. Audit committees should be staffed by properly qualified people. And non-executives should change as an organisation’s strategy shifts to target new markets, new technology or a changing business environment.

He says audit committees are the logical place to add more checks and balances. “How should they do that?” he asks. “By bringing in people who are truly and genuinely qualified to look at aspects that come into play—risk, compliance, audit-related matters and financial reporting.”

He adds: “Audit committees should be recognised and respected for their specific knowledge. It puts a burden on them and they will be more liable if things go wrong, and that’s not an easy thing to accept. But the audit committee chairman should be in the critical place of initiating, directing, suggesting what he or she considers relevant for the benefit for the company…”

And when strategic direction changes, so should the non-executives to suit new objectives. It may not involve all non-executives, but boards should move to bring people in with relevant expertise quickly. This challenges the ideas that non-executives should be just allowed to see out their terms.

“I cannot talk strategically longer than three years down the road,” says Koster. “We know that disruptive technologies can wipe you out overnight.” Changes in the marketplace make it an imperative that younger people make their way into non-executive positions on boards.

But make no mistake, Koster’s demands are not reserved for board and audit committees alone. Shareholders have a responsibility to bear too.

“Beyond any doubt, shareholders should be blamed for not asking more of audit committees,” says Koster. “It really requires shareholders to speak up far more about the issues that they are concerned about.”

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Katie Murray to become chair of Phoenix board audit committee
    July 12, 2022
    retirement

    The pensions savings and life insurance group appointed Murray, who had been serving as a NED, to assume the role in September.

  • New audit committee standards finalised
    May 22, 2023
    Audit ESG reporting

    Role of challenger audit firms and the opinion of investors underlined by new minimum standards.

  • Audit committees 'lose independence' the longer they serve
    September 1, 2021
    notebook on boardroom table

    Study finds committees in troubled firms have fewer female members, more outside directorships, greater shareholdings and longer tenures.

  • Audit committee chairs 'are confusing quality of audit and quality of service'
    February 2, 2022
    Calculator on top of business report

    FRC report also warns that audit committee chairs have a "negative perception of joint audits", despite this being a key reform proposal.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap