Skip to content

31 January, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • stakeholder governance

      Threat to stakeholder governance from Twitter sale ‘overstated’

      Academics and experts argue stakeholder governance will always come second while the law puts the...

    • Davos resilience News round-up: this week in governance

      Lessons from Davos; companies risk sliding back on ethical practices; economics affects everyone; Sir John...

    • audit reform UK Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’

      The Financial Reporting Council still awaits the proposed new statutory powers that would allow it...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • climate litigation

      Climate litigation: how 2022 will shape 2023

      This past year saw a rise in climate litigation, with a focus on the commercial...

    • value whistleblowing

      Why we need to value whistleblowing

      Encouraging staff to speak up and stop harm can reduce legal and reputational risk—both for...

    • HR corporate trust

      HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • A week of business moving to the centre of human rights

      A week of events signals the initiatives underway to have companies play a central role...

    • audit reform IIA Why we need audit reform right now

      There is an "urgent need" for reform to the audit landscape as well as internal...

    • climate change energy crisis Sustainability and climate change: the other energy crisis

      The world is addicted to cheap energy. We need to admit this and have the...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • Board priorities 2023 Board priorities 2023: tact, trust and transparency

      We asked key figures what would help boards this year. The answers ranged from 'smarter...

    • Group of investors/shareholders in glass building Climate issues likely to figure prominently at next year’s AGMs

      A recent webinar heard that say-on-climate voting is expected to rise, while ESG remains a...

    • NEDs role NEDs ‘needed more than ever’ in times of uncertainty

      The non-executive director’s role is to both challenge and listen to management, agreed the panel...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • NED recruitment News round-up: this week in governance

      Your country needs NEDs; governance does not compute; financial firms get more women on board;...

    • HR corporate trust HR: How to build employee trust in corporate culture

      The right HR director is essential to lead on a culture that gets the best...

    • powerful CEOs Boards want powerful CEOs in tough times

      Single-minded chief executives have greater staying ability when business conditions are uncertain, research finds

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • Edelman Trust Barometer 2023

      2023 Edelman Trust Barometer

      The report is the result of the Edelman Trust Institute's research, which sampled more than...

    • Sophos 2023 Threat Report

      Barriers to entry for would-be cybercriminals are lower, with tools and tactics becoming available to...

    • The C-Suite Outlook 2023: On the Edge

      The Conference Board 2023 C-Suite Outlook survey reveals the events that C-suite executives see as...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Spring brings shareholder pay revolt

by Gavin Hinks on May 17, 2016

Pay proposals have seen a raft of companies receive admonishment from shareholders through non-binding votes. But will companies act?

no change there thenThe shareholders are revolting. That phrase may sound somewhat flippant but a quick survey of shareholder votes this spring reveals they are, indeed, up in arms over executive pay.

And though the votes may leave many weary with boredom—after all, we’ve been here before—this year’s rash of shareholder uprisings has a consistency and urgency about it that we may not have seen before.

Writing for The Telegraph, Ashley Hamilton Claxton, corporate governance manager for Royal London Asset Management, says: “Don’t get me wrong, we are not afraid to pay well for exceptional performance.

“But one cannot make decisions about executive pay in a social vacuum and it is hard to ignore or discount the growing concerns about pay inequality, particularly in light of recent lacklustre results.”

A string of big-name companies have been hit by shareholders objecting to boardroom pay packages.

Perhaps the most high-profile among these non-binding polls was the 59% against the pay of Bob Dudley, CEO of oil giant BP.

Bob Dudley. Photo: BP, Flickr
Bob Dudley. Photo: BP, Flickr

But there have been many others. A vote on remuneration at Smith & Nephew saw 53% against, Anglo American 42%, Shire 49% and, perhaps the biggest of them all, Weir Group, where shareholders pulled together a vote of 72% objecting to executive compensation proposals.

Hamilton Claxton says she has noted a number of  trends. The first is that higher pay has been sought even though company performance in 2015 was less than stellar. The reason: pay rises have been modest since the recession and executives are seen as “underpaid relative to peers”.

The second trend is “increasing scepticism” among City investors about pay models and whether they are “fit for purpose”.

Thirdly, there is “growing unease” at the rate at which boardroom pay is climbing compared with the average worker. She complains companies have used consultants to compose their remunerations policies which, while limiting salaries, has hefty cash top-ups for pensions.

Lastly, Hamilton Claxton notes that next year, unlike 2016, will see binding votes on remuneration packages. If 50% of shareholders votes against, remuneration committees will have to go back and start again.

She warns that while a 20% vote against pay was once viewed as shocking, polls of 30% or 40% are becoming the norm and the rhetoric of directors is starting to express this as a success.

Elsewhere, Patrick Jenkins in the Financial Times notes that the “madness’ of executive pay seemed to reach its peak with the package of Martin Winterkorn, the ousted boss of Volkswagen. It included a €5.9m “performance-related” award for 2015, the year in which VW’s value was severely damaged by the emissions scandal. Jenkins notes that investors are now starting to pay serious attention to the issue.

“If mainstream investors … press the issue, it will be unquestionably positive—for investor returns, of course, but also for society at large. It could help curb brewing scandals and fend off a nagging unease with the unfairness of capitalism.”

Clearly, the answer is greater involvement of shareholders, but this may be difficult given that their resources are spread over highly fragmented investment portfolios.

In April, boardrooms received a broadside from the Executive Remuneration Working Group, a collection of high-flying executives keen to see pay overhauled. The report called for reform of long-term bonus schemes and more transparency.

Legal & General’s chief executive, Nigel Wilson, worked on the report. He told the BBC: “The current approach to executive pay in UK listed companies is not fit for purpose, and has resulted in a poor alignment of interests between executives, shareholders and the company.

“Greater transparency, clearer alignment of shareholder, company and executive interests, more accountability on the part of remuneration committees and greater engagement with and control by shareholders, working through company boards, are vital to restore confidence in a system widely seen as broken.”

Clearly, the answer is greater involvement of shareholders, but this may be difficult given that their resources are spread over highly fragmented investment portfolios.

It’s worth bearing in mind the High Pay Centre report, published in April, which revealed that top pay was indeed still rising. Disclosures by 71 of the FTSE 100 showed that 40 reported higher single figures for 2015 than the sum for the previous year.

The centre’s director, Stefan Stern, said the UK’s disclosure rules meant that pay changes could be seen, “but the latent power possessed by investors to call a halt to these excessive rewards remains unexercised”.

However, 2017 will see a new element to question pay when the US introduces a mandatory requirement for most public companies to publish the ratio of CEO pay to that of employees.

On The Conversation website, Tobore Okah-Avae of Lancaster University writes that the publication of pay ratios will “likely help reduce pay inequality”.

He adds: “A mandatory rule requiring the publication of top-to-bottom pay ratios could … have two potential effects.

“It may force corporate boards to rethink excessive CEO pay and would hopefully force an increase in the pay offered to lower-level employees as well.”

 

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Predictable pay-outs expose the charade of performance-related pay
    November 16, 2021
    CEOs chasing money

    Incentive plans, share awards and bonus payments have become almost a guaranteed part of a chief executive’s pay package.

  • Executive pay, sustainability KPIs and the climate crisis
    December 1, 2021
    CSO with green tie and leaf in his top pocket

    Linking KPIs to sustainability targets results in complexity. A focus on corporate purpose is a better way to tackle climate change.

  • UK shareholder pay revolts increase by 56% in 2021
    February 23, 2022
    executive pay

    Last year saw the highest number of notifiable shareholder revolts on pay for five years—and investors seem willing to maintain the pressure.

  • CEO Covid pay cuts merely ‘symbolic’
    July 19, 2022
    pandemic pay

    Top-level pay was boosted to pre-pandemic levels by incentives schemes in many cases, leaving investors ‘outraged’, researchers found.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

Ashley Hamilton Claxton, Bob Dudley, corporate governance, Executive pay, finance, Martin Winterkorn, pay reform, shareholder pay

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • Audit reform in the UK risks ‘losing momentum’
  • Elon Musk weighs in against ISS and Glass Lewis
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • Activist investor campaigns rise back up to pre-Covid levels
  • How to ensure stakeholders trust your sustainability reporting
 

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

2022 AGM Season Forecast: An Eye on The Horizon

To help prepare for AGMs in 2022, Equiniti (EQ) hi...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...
Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

Creativity in a Crisis: a Boardroom Map for Innovation

In the uncertain times at the height of any crisis...
Board Directors Guide to D&O Liability Insurance - November 2020 - AIG & Board Agenda

Board Directors' Guide to D&O Liability Insurance

Directors face liability over a range of new threa...
Leadership-in-Risk-Management-Board-Report

Leadership in Risk Management: Board Report

Board Agenda, in association with Mazars and INSEA...
Director's Guide to Internal Investigations

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...

 


 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|