Skip to content

26 September, 2023

Subscribe Advertise About Us
  • My Account
  • Register
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
    • Categories

      • View All
      • Board Moves
    • board control

      Are boards losing control?

      We need to ensure that regulations do not inappropriately reduce a board’s ability to take...

    • audit reform Labour commits to audit reform legislation

      Shadow minister for business, Jonathan Reynolds, says Labour will push through audit reform when in...

    • News round-up: this week in governance

      Lonely leadership; how governance helps in a crisis; Kerrie Waring to depart ICGN; ESG and...

  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • sustainability into finance

      How to integrate sustainability into financial decision-making

      Proactive leadership and board commitment are essential to transform notions of sustainability into fiscally viable...

    • reporting requirements

      Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • policy on human rights

      Why you need a policy on human rights

      As well as being the right thing to do, this element of a sustainable business...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • board control

      Are boards losing control?

      We need to ensure that regulations do not inappropriately reduce a board’s ability to take...

    • reporting requirements Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

      We must balance the need for disclosure of non-financial information so that it is sufficient,...

    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • helle bank jorgensen Helle Bank Jørgensen on governance, ESG and how board directors can become stewards of the future

      In spite of ESG toxicity in the US, she remains optimistic that companies are working...

    • information resilience IT transformation sees boards moving to ‘continuous’ management

      Data analytics available on demand requires a resilient—and selective—approach to sharing information, a webinar panel...

    • life sciences podcast Reform of NHS levy ‘harms UK competitiveness’

      Boards in the pharmaceutical and life sciences sector face increasingly difficult decisions, according to a...

  • Careers
      • View all
      • Selection
      • Board Moves
    • CEO talent Can high CEO turnover boost gender equality?

      The trend for boards favouring internal pipelines for CEO succession creates an opportunity to nurture...

    • Starbucks sign outside shop in Warsaw, Poland DEI policies are targets for litigation, warns US lawyer

      Right-wing activists will continue to sue corporates over diversity, equity and inclusion policies they perceive...

    • CEO churn CEO churn is highest since 2019

      Chief executive appointments in the FTSE 100 are also up—but only 27% of incoming CEOs...

  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Corporate & Advisory Services
    • ciia risk in focus

      Risk in Focus 2024: Hot topics for internal auditors

      Risk in Focus 2024 surveyed chief audit executives on their key challenges: geopolitical uncertainty and cybersecurity...

    • G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023 cover

      G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance 2023

      The G20/OECD principles help policy makers improve the regulatory and institutional framework for corporate governance.

    • stakeholder engagement

      Director Reference Guide: Stakeholder engagement

      Board Agenda's 'Director Reference Guide' for boards on building an honest and trust-based relationship with...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Selection
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

Fostering the principle

by Lars-Erik Forsgårdh on January 6, 2016

High-quality explanations for deviation from corporate governance codes are needed if the “comply or explain” principle is to take root across the EU.

European flag

European Flag. Photo: © European Parliament - Audiovisual Unit

European flagThe European Confederation of Directors Associations (ecoDa) recognises the importance of the “comply or explain” principle as a method for improving the effectiveness of corporate governance. EcoDa accordingly supports the European Commission’s recommendation of April 2014, which provides guidance to improve the overall quality of corporate governance statements and the application of the “comply or explain” concept.

To this end, ecoDa in close cooperation with Mazars and the European Corporate Governance Codes Network (ECGCN) has taken the initiative to conduct a survey of the corporate governance codes in force,* the monitoring systems developed in the different member states as well as the status of compliance reporting.

Governance and monitoring systems across the EU

Member states usually have one corporate governance (CG) code for listed companies. CG codes are mostly a combined effort between the private and the public sector (with emphasis on private self-regulation). The UK took the lead in developing a code for listed companies based on the concept of “comply or explain” in 1992. The influence of the UK code and the OECD guidelines were important for the other countries when they developed their national CG codes. With the new EU recommendation, all member states now are moving into a more aligned European direction.

The new ecoDa survey shows that in a European context, it is difficult to compare the outcome of compliance with the codes.

The new ecoDa survey shows that in a European context, it is difficult to compare the outcome of compliance with the codes.

Degrees of market capitalization across Europe and shareholders’ structures vary a lot among the member states. The classical example of a stock exchange with widely dispersed shareholding and a high degree of free float is found in the UK. On the other hand, listed companies in continental European countries and, most extremely in Eastern European countries, have a much more stable and concentrated shareholding structure; consequently, they have a free float that is much more limited.

There are also large differences in the legal status of CG codes: they vary considerably in approach with quite different degrees of detail. Codes with detailed provisions should allow for more deviations while codes with high-level principles should make it difficult for companies  to explain why they don’t comply with certain principles.

Legal and social cultures differ a lot between the member states too, and this fact has a huge impact on how codes are applied in practice. The initiative to develop a corporate governance code for listed companies has mostly been a combined effort between the private sector and governments/regulators. However, the degree of involvement of governments/regulators is quite different across the states in the survey.

The monitoring approach is also different. The monitoring bodies are different as well as the scope of the monitoring studies (analysis of all parts of the compliance/governance statement or focus on a number of issues; analysis of publicly available information and/or interviews with boards); and the number of companies monitored (covering all listed companies or only a sample and/or a certain category).

The differences  in monitoring among the EU member states poses a problem in the sense that it may create a risk of losing the legitimacy of the “comply or explain” approach.

As in five other countries, the body responsible for the administering and the development of the CG code in Sweden differs from the body responsible for its implementation and monitoring.

Sweden has clearly defined the cooperation between the two main monitoring bodies by allocating and formalising their specific roles: the Swedish Corporate Governance Board assesses the functioning of the code as such on a macro level, while the stock exchange assesses the individual company’s compliance. An interesting approach has been developed by the Stockholm Stock Exchange; they target the whole set of listed companies but on a rotation basis.

The differences in monitoring among the EU member states poses a problem in the sense that it may create a risk of losing the legitimacy of the “comply or explain” approach. Since codes are not a mandatory regulation in all member countries, it is important to encourage a level playing field in terms of monitoring practices through private initiatives.

As regards “comply or explain”, the overall trend is that compliance is increasing considerably. However, more effort is needed to improve the quality of explanations.

There is still not a uniform approach but there is a clear trend to improve them and to develop additional guidelines in accordance with the recommendations of the EU.

In Sweden, the Corporate Governance Board is wary of such guidelines for fear that they might lead to “boiler-plate” explanations of little information value in each particular case. The governance board considers the actual compliance statistics disquietingly high, fearing that too high a degree of compliance may lead to the code, in reality, becoming a mandatory regulation. In this case, it would risk losing its function as an instrument of continually improving the quality of corporate governance through always being ahead of general practice.

The way forward

The awareness of “comply or explain” should be higher in the capital markets. It is important to show that alternatives to code provisions can serve the same purposes.

A  great deal of persuasive powers are needed to convince the investment society of the advantages of the comply or explain principle.

Although the “comply or explain” principle allows listed companies the flexibility to deviate from the code provisions, institutional investors, asset managers and proxy advisors often tend to dislike such governance deviations and consider them inferior in quality.

A  great deal of persuasive powers are needed to convince the investment society of the advantages of “comply or explain”. Therefore it is important to encourage high-quality explanations when there are deviations from code provisions.

To promote more focus on decision-making on governance matters, and to foster best practices and effective support for governance recommendations for codes, ecoDa will now as a next step in the project conduct a survey of the board’s role in designing an effective framework of corporate governance.

Lars-Erik Forsgårdh is a former chairman of ecoDa and current chairman of the Swedish Academy of Board Directors.

*ecoDa/Mazars study: “Corporate Governance Compliance and Monitoring Systems across the EU”, October 2015.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • CEOs under fire: the psychology of leaders in a warzone
    March 11, 2022
    Bullet hole in glass in front of Ukrainian flag

    The business world expects bosses to perform under pressure, not under fire. How are corporate leaders in Ukraine dealing with the crisis?

  • Battle of the boards: risk, ESG and two-tier board structures
    April 22, 2022
    Board risk meeting

    There is an inherent conflict of interest between main and executive boards, with two different time horizons and two different risk impacts.

  • Board effectiveness in the new world of work
    April 21, 2022
    Boardroom at sunrise

    Boards should use this post-pandemic period to reflect and reinvent themselves and their working practices.

  • Paul Manduca takes the wheel as chair of Eurowag
    September 16, 2021
    Paul Manduca, Eurowag

    The former chair of Prudential and Aon UK has joined the board of the commercial road transport services provider.

For thoughtful journalism, expert insights on corporate governance and an extensive library of reports, guides and tools to help boards and directors navigate the complexities of their roles, subscribe to Board Agenda

comply or explain, ecoDa, European Union, Sweden

Search


Sign up to our Newsletter

Receive independent news, thoughtful journalism & expert insights about leadership, corporate governance & key boardroom issues straight to your inbox every week.

SIGN UP

Follow Us

 

 

 

 

Most Popular

  • ‘Fast-moving threats’ will soon challenge boards, warns CIIA
  • Meta faces US lawsuit over its corporate governance
  • News round-up: this week in governance
  • How to integrate sustainability into financial decision-making
  • Don’t let reporting requirements lead to boilerplate disclosures

Featured Partner Profile

Diligent

Diligent

Diligent Corporation, which was founded in 2001, is headquartered in New York, NY with a European HQ in London. Diligent’s modern governance platform empowers leaders and teams at every level of the organisation to digitally transform and create ...

Featured Partner Resources

Leadership ESG

Leadership in ESG Integration: a study into UK board oversight, implementation and disclosure

This research report is based on detailed response...
The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

The Engagement Appeal: The Path to Inclusive Investor Engagement

This is the inaugural white paper from The Engagem...
Mazars c-suite 2023

Mazars C-suite barometer 2023

The Mazars C-suite barometer is based on responses...

Stakeholder Engagement: A Roadmap for UK Plc Boards

This guide aims to provide directors and their col...

Digital Boards: How Technology Adoption is Driving Culture Change and Resiliency

Digital tools proved their worth to boards during ...
Leadership in AI report

Leadership in AI

This report from Board Agenda and Mazars, in assoc...

A Director's Guide to Conducting Internal Investigations

An internal investigation must be handled meticulo...
 

ADVERTISE – FREE CORPORATE LISTING

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
ADD

ADVERTISE – PROMOTE YOUR REPORTS & WHITEPAPERS

FREE - Add your company profile to our Corporate & Advisory Directory.
Add Resource

Register Free

Register to receive free article views, selected resource downloads, and all the latest news alerts straight to your inbox. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Corporate & Advisory Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Sitemap
|