Skip to content

12 July, 2025

  • Saved Articles
  • My Account
  • Subscribe
  • Log In
  • Log Out

Board Agenda

  • Governance
  • Strategy
  • Risk
  • Ethics
  • News
  • Insight
    • Categories

      • View all
      • Governance
      • Strategy
      • Risk
      • Ethics
      • Board Expertise
      • finance
      • Technology
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay

      Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • executive pay

      Executive pay trends in 2025

      Opposition to remuneration reports has grown sharply, according to Georgeson’s analysis of voting outcomes in...

  • Comment
      • View all
    • EU sustainability

      Omnibus package must not undermine EU sustainability

      Now is the time for Europe to speed up green transition, rather than slow it...

    • high pay Pay gap transparency needs to be better

      It’s not unknown for a CEO to earn 500 times as much the median employee,...

    • future-proof governance levers How to future-proof your business

      For boards to bolster resilience and create value in a polycrisis, a combination of hard...

  • Interviews
      • View All Interviews
      • Podcasts
      • Webinars
    • UK Corporate Governance Code Board meetings ‘are not up to scratch’

      Nearly three-quarters of board members believe the board’s performance in meetings needs improvement, an expert...

    • financial sanctions Tariffs chaos drives boardroom focus on resilience

      Business leaders will prioritise the resilience of their organisations in the face of economic upheaval...

    • supply chain oversight Act now on supply chain oversight, boards warned

      Board directors need to critically engage with the business’s supply chain activity, a panel of...

  • Board Careers
  • Resource Centre
      • White Paper Downloads
      • Book Reviews
      • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
    • C-suite barometer: outlook 2025 – UK insights

      Forvis Mazars draws UK insights from its global study and looks at UK executives’ strategic...

    • Talent Management 2025 Mind Gym

      Talent Management in 2025

      From rethinking leadership to wrestling with AI, MindGym's report reveals the trends shaping talent strategies...

    • Korn Ferry CHRO 2025 (Copy)

      On The Highwire: Being a CHRO in 2025

      Korn Ferry surveyed 750 senior HR leaders (including 450 CHROs) to understand their key priorities...

  • Events
  • Search by topic
    • Governance
    • Strategy
    • Risk
    • Ethics
    • Regulation
    • ESG
    • Investor Relations
    • Careers
    • Board Expertise
    • finance
    • Technology

It’s all about attitude

by Mala Shah-Coulon

Listed companies in the UK are required under the country’s governance code to undergo a board evaluation. But they need to be set up and implemented in the right way to have the desired effects.

male boards

Image: Shutterstock

Image: Shutterstock
Image: Shutterstock

Board effectiveness is often viewed as a nebulous area for which there is no blueprint for implementation. Yet on exploring the issue when writing our report Board effectiveness – Continuing the Journey with The Investment Association, we identified two clear business imperatives:

  • The importance of boards as a whole keeping up in a constantly evolving environment.
  • The responsibility of individual board members to share their ideas, experiences—and often forgotten—ask for support and guidance to help them improve and develop.

While there are several ways in which to achieve these imperatives, a key aspect is the board’s understanding of its current performance and insights on where it might improve.

Boards of listed companies in the UK subject to the Corporate Governance Code have for some time been required to undertake a formal and rigorous annual evaluation of their own performance, of committees and of individual directors.  These reviews have become the norm, but are they having the desired impact? After all, boardroom and corporate scandals continue apace.

Scope, execution and follow-through

Performance reviews for employees are used across many businesses and sectors. They are designed to make individuals stop and think about their achievements and development areas for the future.

Board evaluations too should help boards reflect and set goals for the future. However, they need to be set up and executed in the right way to ensure that they have the desired impact.

Boards have a key role to play in setting strategy and for the stewardship of the company. The scope of an evaluation therefore needs to be aligned to these. For example, in terms of strategy, an evaluation should cover the following points:

  • The board’s role in setting the strategy;
  • The board’s role in assessing progress made in achieving the strategy and the interventions and actions it has committed (or should commit to) to keep on track;
  • A forward looking view on whether the board has the right skills and experience for the future to set and achieve the strategy (and if not the plans in place to fill the gaps);
  • Whether the board agendas and information packs duly reflect the board’s role in strategy and its achievement;
  • The impact of culture on achieving the strategy.

While it is important to have a framework to perform an evaluation, there needs to be some flexibility to allow all involved to be open and balanced in the way they feel most comfortable. Box ticking through an evaluation will not give the right results, and  may often lead to “hearing only the music you want to”.

In order to get the most from a board evaluation, gathering views from those who are not on the board but have access to it can be useful.

In order to get the most from a board evaluation, gathering views from those who are not on the board but have access to it can be useful. It can provide an outside-in perspective on issues like board dynamic and chemistry, which are at the heart of board effectiveness.

But bringing together high-achieving, successful individuals does not guarantee that they operate as a functional, cohesive team. As boards become more diverse in their make-up, inclusive leadership is key and something that should be tested as part of the evaluation.

An aspect that should also be tested in the process is how well individuals understand each other’s distinctive personal attributes (as opposed to their generic skill set) such that these attributes are actively called upon when deliberating an issue and making a decision.

If they aren’t well understood, then board members are almost relying on chance that an individual will bring to bear a particular attribute when it is needed.

Adequate time and resource also need to be set aside both to perform the evaluation but also to deal with the findings.

We have heard anecdotally that while boards often budget every three years for an externally facilitated evaluation, sometimes there is no budget set aside to implement the actions in the intervening years, some of which may take more than a year to implement fully.

A robust evaluation strategy in a (three-year) cycle is therefore key: how is progress from an externally facilitated review in year one followed through in years two and three?

The process to discuss the findings of any board review needs to be a democratic one. The full report should be circulated to the board and members given time to absorb the findings.

While there is no panacea to prevent corporate scandals, the heart of the matter often lies with the culture of an organisation, driven by the board.

Some points may ultimately end up being dismissed, but this needs to be a collective role, following debate and discussion. This is key to ensuring that any thorny issues are dealt with head-on, for example comments relating to the chairman’s leadership style.

While there is no panacea to prevent corporate scandals, the heart of the matter often lies with the culture of an organisation, driven by the board. This is why it is essential for boards to make sure they are as effective as possible and deal with any problems at the earliest possible point.

Like most things in life, it’s the attitude that matters. Board evaluations can be compliance-focused, resource-intensive and self-congratulatory, or they can be creative and insightful.

The leadership of the chairman is essential to ensure the latter, but he or she must have the backing and commitment of the entire board to change, to improve, to embed any actions—within the boardroom or throughout the organisation.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Mail

Related Posts

  • Diligent launches its third Modern Governance 100 awards
    July 1, 2021
    Diligent Modern Governance 100

    This year's awards feature six new categories, including ESG & Diversity Trailblazer, Outstanding Community Ally and Cyber Risk Leader.

  • 5 topics to improve the effectiveness of your board
    May 31, 2022
    notebook on boardroom table

    How many board meetings result in real progress for your company? Make sure these discussion points have a regular spot on the agenda.

  • Performance declines as boards grow in size
    March 7, 2023
    board size

    Researchers found that investment dropped by 2-3 percentage points as companies passed from 12 to 16 board members.

  • Many executives 'fail to understand the role and value of boards'
    May 31, 2022
    Empty boardroom

    A recent webinar on board effectiveness discussed the mix of competence and courage required from non-executive directors.

Search


Follow Us

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts – Sign up here

 

Most Popular

Featured Resources

wef global risks 2025

The Global Risks Report 2025

The 20th edition of the Global Risks Report reveals an increasingly fractured global...
Supply chain management cover

Strategic Oversight in Supply Chain Management: A Guide for Corporate Boards 2025

Supply chains have become complex, interdependent and opaque and—according to research...
OB-Cyber-Security

Cyber Security: What Boards Need to Know

Maintaining firewalls, protecting servers and filtering malicious emails rarely make...

The IA’S Principles Of Remuneration 2024 2025

This guidance from the Investment Association is aimed at assisting remuneration...
Diligent 2024 leadership tech cover

Leadership, decision-making & the role of technology: Business survey 2024

This research report by Board Agenda and Diligent sheds light on how board directors...

Director Reference Guide: Navigating Conflict in the Boardroom

The 'Director Reference Guide' on navigating conflict in the boardroom provides practical...
Nasdaq 2024 governance report cover

Nasdaq 2024 Global Governance Pulse

This Nasdaq survey gathered data from more than 870 board members, executives, and...

Becoming a non-executive director (4th edition)

Board composition is the subject of much debate, while the role of the non-executive...
art & science brainloop new cover

The Art & Science of Creating an Effective Board

Boards are coming under more scrutiny and pressure than ever before from regulators,...
SAA First time NED guide

First Time Guide for Non-Executive Directors

The role of the non-executive director has never been more vital: to advise, support,...

Register Free

Stay in the know! Register to access the latest governance news; plus receive updates about our events and podcasts. Register


  • Editors & Contributors
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • Board Advisory & Corporate Services
  • Media Marketing Solutions
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Board Director Network
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
|

Copyright © 2025 Questor Media Group Ltd.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap